Science Needs Animal Testing Essay

2122 words - 9 pages

Pharmaceutical and medical research benefits humans greatly. Much of these life-saving developments are being conducted via animal experimentation. It is often said that animal testing should not be implemented, for it is not morally ideal or necessary. Opponents of animal testing urgently demand for alternative methods, which aim to replace the practice of animal studies. However, first and foremost, animal research saves lives. It is undeniable that animal-based experimentation has played a vital part in finding drugs and live-saving treatments to improve health and medicine. Animal studies also contributed to numerous medical advances over the last decade; these include surgical ...view middle of the document...

Proper anesthetics are used for procedures that might cause pain, along with analgesics thereafter (par 4).
Supported by this, if animal medical experimentations are being conducted, they have to be governed, for which the conductors have to ensure that animals are being treated humanly and accordingly by the laws. Therefore, the concern that animals are being mistreated in laboratorial environment is not necessary.
Another argument opposing animal experimentation illustrates that animal testing can be very costly, for which billions of U.S taxpayer dollars are being spent annually on animal testing. According to a recent article by PETA, “Based on NIH’s 2010 budget, animal testing accounts for more than 16 billions in U.S. taxpayer money” (par 1). Despite this, it is an acceptable moral price to pay when millions of people around the world, whom are suffering from fatal and incurable disease, can be saved. It is understandably difficult for humans to, at the same time, conducting animal studies for medical purposes that aimed to cure destructive diseases, while having great empathy for the other species. After all, human lives are priceless. The sacrificing price can be significantly high and merciless, however the resulting benefit is immeasurable.
Furthermore, it is irrefutable that animal testing contributes greatly to the length and quality of human life. Animal experimentation is necessary for medical development and pharmaceutical trials, for it plays a vital part in finding drugs and live-saving treatments to improve health and medicines. Numerous cures and treatment for fatal diseases that save millions of people worldwide are being made possible with the aid of animal research, which includes cures for Parkinson’s disease, cancer, and many more.
Parkinson is a fatal debilitating brain disease that affects millions of people globally. It is famously known for suffocating its victims with endless shaking, rigidity, balance problems, and slowed movement. At the present time, only palliative treatments are available, so a long-lasting alternative treatment is urgently needed. Scientists have recently concluded that the use of monkeys in research experiments on Parkinson’s is critical to understand the nature of this progressive disorder, and essential to develop a life-changing treatment for this disease. Within the article titled “Using Monkeys to Understand and Cure Parkinson Disease”, D. Eugene Redmond claims that monkey experiments are “often essential for progress with neuropsychiatric and brain-related problems” (par. 2), because monkeys share many genetical similarities with human in higher brain functions. This then makes them an excellent model in research experiment for Parkinson’s disease. In other words, there is a high probability that the predictions resulted from monkey experiments will be strongly correct. Therefore, primate experimental research will maximize the probability of benefits, while minimizing the harms of...

Find Another Essay On Science Needs Animal Testing

The Rights of Testing on Animals

1190 words - 5 pages Animal testing can harm many different species of animals for our selfish needs of being safe and no harm coming to humans. Many animals are at risk when scientists test on them for products animals do not have the necessary need for them. Health problems, testing, alternatives and student surveys, and rebuttal make testing very wrong in every point of view. An animal’s daily life in a testing room is very stressful and life risking every

Animal Testing: Is it Right or Wrong?

1609 words - 7 pages scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon.org). Innocent creatures are taken advantage of, for the sake of human health. According to both secular and Jewish sources, animal testing is very unethical. The use of animal testing is wrong, cruel and inhumane towards animals and should be stopped. Humans have needs, and so do animals; we are all living things. Each day most drink and eat when they desire, and are free to move from place to place

The Differences in Human and Animal Genes

831 words - 4 pages failed to predict the monstrous effects on the human trial volunteers” because the medicine advances and the animals reactions follows and adapts while humans reactions differ (Source B). Animal testing for medicine not only hurts the animal by “exposure to drugs” but it fails to benefit the quality and humanity of our science(Source G). The better approach to medicine and human disease strays away from animals. In the magazine, Good Medicine, they

Animal Research Is Not Helping Humans

1753 words - 8 pages . 37. Many researchers today argue that it is necessary to continue with live animal testing and to continue with the same methods that they have been using for years. This is another example of why the need to look for new improved methods for testing without the need for animals. Jerry Vlasak, a trauma surgeon and animal-rights activist says, “it’s clear that if you look at the science we have much better ways of testing drugs to see whether

Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated

1255 words - 5 pages Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated.In the present era of science and technology, animals are used for experiments in various domains such as cosmetic testing, education, biomedical research and so on. Educational institutes from all over the world use animals in biomedical testing; cosmetic and genetic industries primarily use animals for different types of tests. Sarah Rose A. Miller, who wrote the prize-winning essay for the

Taking a Stand Against Animal Testing

1865 words - 7 pages “microbrain” (PETA, 2014, Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint). Scientists use it to study tumors, artificial skin, and bone marrow. With these alternative we can now test irritancy on protein membranes, produce and test vaccines using human tissues, and perform pregnancy tests without killing rabbits (PETA, 2014, Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint). Therefore, animal testing needs to be banned. There are other countries

Medicine: Animal Testing

1710 words - 7 pages . Contrary to primary belief, dogs, cats, and primates only account for .02% of overall testing. Primates, because they share 99% of human DNA, are used to study neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer's. Animal testing, although seen as inhumane, should remain a necessary form of experimentation for medical science. Majority of testing done on animals is done on small feeder mice, the kind people would purchase at a local pet store to feed to

What the Government Should do About Animal Testing

2125 words - 9 pages writing, I will argue that the state’s policy should be that researchers be given free reign as long as they advance science. This writing works to propose a policy on animal testing that should be employed by our state. The history and the current opinions will be discussed to give context to the argument. I will explain the policy of utilitarianism and how my personal view is similar to that of a utilitarian’s. I will address the rebuttals to my

Animal Testing

885 words - 4 pages . National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) too, used animal testing to learn more about moon and outer space by sending space monkeys. Animal testing is not only beneficial for human but to animals as well. Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) and Feline Leukemia virus (FeLV) infections are the major cause of deaths in cats. The disease was cured with the animal testing which led to the founding of vaccine. This is considered one of the revolutionary success in the veterinary science. Animal testing is not cruel, it helps the human race and animals survive and prosper.

Animal testing: Inevitability of animal testing

1161 words - 5 pages animals. Animal testing is inevitable for three reasons: provision of essential data, contribution to humanity and guarantee of animal rights. To begin with, animal testing deducts vital data that cannot be drawn from human testing.Scientific developments related to human ethics are accomplishedby animal testing.Ethics of human are so important that science has a limitation line drawn by them. For instance, cloning is banned due to human ethics

to kill or not to kill

1363 words - 6 pages Animal testing began many decades ago with the intent to advance the world of science. Today, we have come a long way, but, have the testing methods become less unethical? The U.S estimates that 18.5 million animals per year, which is 50,700 per day or one every 1.7 seconds are used for testing. (Biba). Animal testing is a cruel and unethical method for testing purposes because alternative methods have been proven more effective and accurate

Similar Essays

Animal Testing Needs To Be Stopped

831 words - 4 pages , there are people around you observing your pain. Life is miserable in your little empty cage. This is what life was for monkeys at the Institute of Behavioral Research in Silver Spring, Maryland. The monkeys at the institute had their nervous system incapacitated. The researchers would force the monkeys to move their limbs by withholding food from them (DeMello, Margo). This is a callous treatment of animals. Animal testing needs to be modulate

Animal Testing Needs To Stop Essay

1039 words - 4 pages Cosmetic and drug companies should stop animal testing. By animal testing, the companies not only violate the animals' rights (which is breaking the law), but their testing methods are hazardous which endanger the animal's life. Finally, the companies should stop animal testing because each year we lose hundreds of thousands of animals and could make a difference by stopping this cruelty. Stop the animal testing, and save a life

Use Of Animal In Scientific Research

1584 words - 6 pages turn out to be more harmful than beneficial in the final product. Death could occur in taking a certain type of medicine, yet the drug could pass through animal testing. Animal testing is unsafe. Genetically, animals are not the same as humans. “Animals In Science” declares, “Animal models of disease are an outdated and inadequate methodology for predicting what treatments are safe and effective for humans” (“Animals In Science”). Moreover

Animal Testing And People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals

1307 words - 5 pages computer technology when processing drug development and testing. The scientists believe the discovery process is more efficient with human tissue. “If you have more information on human genes, what’s the point of going back to animals?” (Pharmagene Cofounder Gordon Baxter) It is crazy how places like England can realize alternative methods are more beneficial that animal tests. This message from Pharmagene needs to spread around the world. The