This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Science Vs. Religion Essay

1417 words - 6 pages

Religion versus science, the debates and conflicts have been on for centuries. For both religious and scientific ideals, the faith people have drives them. In this paper, I will examine the story of “The Eye of Apollo” by G.K. Chesterton, and the episode “House vs. God” of House, M.D., in order to question this conflict. The main character—Father Brown—in “The Eye of Apollo” combines his reasoning with his religious ideals and beliefs, or we can say his faith in God leads him to the truth of the crime. However, if we try to have a deeper look at the both the rational and religious sides of Father Brown, his perspectives on the immortality and justice are similar to Dr House, who interprets his rationality based on science. Thus both the beliefs and faith in religion and science in some way reflect the faith and way of thinking of people, and the two different ideals don’t necessarily conflict with each other.
In The Eye of Apollo, Father Brown solves the mystery of Pauline Stacey’s death. Father Brown is a Catholic priest and serves and a detective. The story begins with a debut of a new religion of Apollo and the New Priest of Apollo, Kalon. The new religion claims “it can cure all the physical diseases”. Pauline Stacey was blind who was heiress of great wealth and power and believed in the New Religion. When Father Brown and Flambeau were in the building, the tragedy happened—Pauline Stacey fell down onto the elevator and died. After a short investigation of the sisters’ office and observation, Father Brown starts questioning Kalon with doubts. But Kalon gives a long speech in defense of his religion and his innocence of the murder. He believes that Miss Stacey died of her faith in the new religion, which is not strong enough to save her from the fall. Kalon thus argues that this case should be described as “suicide”. However, Father Brown keeps questioning Kalon until this priest of Apollo flees. Father Brown finally points out the truth that Kalon kills Pauline with his setup based on Miss Stacey being blind in order to get her money. Miss Pauline’s sister, Joan Pauline, is also part of the crime according to Father Brown, who has also taken advantage of her sister’s blindness and played trick on the will.
We can easily find Father Brown’s interpretation about “truths”. People apparently will recognize him as a rational and religious person who is a skeptic of pure “sciences”, however, not necessarily the scientific methodology. Upon learning the new religion mentioned by Flambeau, Father Brown holds his doubts about the religion of Apollo: he doubts seriously on whether “it can cure the one spiritual disease”. Father Brown actually has found Kalon is the murderer before he learns what is the tragedy. As he says: “there came a crash and a scream down the street, and the priest of Apollo did not start or look around… I know that he was expecting it” (The Eye of Apollo). This kind of distrust as presented by him conveys his...

Find Another Essay On Science vs. Religion

Inherit the Wind: Religion vs. Science

1214 words - 5 pages Inherit the Wind: Religion vs. Science   Stanley Kramer's film, Inherit the Wind, examines a trial based on the 1925 Scopes trial in Dayton, Tennessee. Often referred to as "The Trial of the Century" (Scopes Trial Web Page), the Scopes trial illuminated the controversy between the Christian theory of creation and the more scientific theory of evolution. John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was arrested for illegally

Knowledge: Science vs Religion Essay

1607 words - 6 pages There has already been some knowledge that people once believed in, but then someone discovered new information that contradicted the previous knowledge everyone thought was true. In this essay I will consider some knowledge issues considering the view of two different areas of knowledge, which I chose natural science and religion. The purpose of this essay is to distinguish between different accepted knowledge, and to investigate why some

Science vs Religion

1567 words - 6 pages Title of Assignment Is science just another form of religion, with people like physicist Stephen Hawking among its high priests? Are science and religions simply both similar social constructions? In your response to this question, specifically consider how irrational social factors influence everything, including science and religion. Introduction One of today's most disputable and warmed issues is whether the clash between science and

Science VS Religion

2196 words - 9 pages Science and Religion (By darongma@yahoo.com)Science and Religion have been long time enemies to each other as they may seem to the world. For centuries, they have remained noble but arrogant, both stood firm on their own grounds, neither wanted to give way. For many scientists, they are afraid that tortures the church once imposed on Galileo for speaking of scientific truth would again repeat; they fear that not only religion slows down

Science vs. Religion: How were we created?

1502 words - 6 pages      The idea of creation is one of the most controversial issues we have today. Your age, background, religion, and beliefs are the main characters that effect what you believe created the world. Science believes several theories on the creation but the most accepted is the Big Bang Theory. Religion has their own views on creation, Christians believe that God created the world, Islamic believe that Allah created man but

Religion and Faith vs. Reason and Science

1039 words - 4 pages The general assumption with people is that science and religion, or faith and reason, are stuck in an infinite war against each other. Someone must choose to be a person of thought, reason, and science, or choose to embrace religion, scripture, and faith alone. If this is true, then someone who is with the Roman Catholic Church rejects science with all of its theories, and if one embraces science, then one rejects the Church and all of her

`Why did Charlemagne accept the imperial title?' Science vs Religion

2483 words - 10 pages effect of science on religion during the course of the nineteenth century, have tended to employ two terms: `religious science' and `irreligious science' .To some, this distinction may appear unnecessary, since science as a process of discovery is not generally taken to overlap with theology. However, when a schism began to appear in society between those willing to defend their inherited faith, and those unwilling to do so (and in many cases

Science and Religion

1272 words - 5 pages vs. evolution is one of the only foundations between the relationship of religion and science. Contrarily, science and religion are not at a constant battle. They exist as two different, usually conflicting, beliefs of solving the same problem (A Brief Overview; Examples; Causes). Pumfrey explains this:"Although histories of science and religion produced in recent decadeshave tended to argue that complexification and contextualization

Argument Between Science and Religion

1961 words - 8 pages Why would educated, reasonable people believe in one side of an argument when the majority of the evidence points to the other? The argument between science and religion began with Charles Darwin publishing Origin of the Species, and since then, is still a conflict, because every individual questions: Where do people come from? Where does the earth come from? The universe? Not only Charles Darwin, but many scientist who followed Charles Darwin

Science and Religion. . . Sisters or Enemies?

1573 words - 6 pages . Zero: The Bibliography of a Dangerous Idea. New York: Viking Penguin, 2002.von Braun, Wernher. "Science as Religious Activity." All Believers are Brothers."Why We Are Not Muslims." The Science of Islam vs The Religion of Islam. IBIBLIO.ORG. http://www.ibiblio.org/nge/notmuslims.html. 13 May, 2003.

Science V. Religion: The Scopes Monkey Trial

1389 words - 6 pages overturns the conviction on a technicality. The judge, not the jury, set the fine. The law is not declared unconstitutional and it stayed on the law books until 1967. In closing, the Scopes trial represented the turbulence of the 1920s, but remains relevant today. It was a fierce battle of modern vs. traditional. It was the new science vs. the old religion. It was a battle that did not have a clear victory for either side, but did open the eyes of

Similar Essays

Religion Vs. Science Essay

1689 words - 7 pages Religion vs. Science This paper will examine the scientific view verse religion. I feel their support for the big picture is shallow and untenable. I believe in science but I also have faith. Scientific research has lead to dramatic and more humane treatments of persons suffering from mental disease, depression, and physical injury. The reputation of scientists has reached an all-time high. Majority of Americans have said

Science Vs. Religion Essay

2052 words - 8 pages Science vs. Religion Since the dawn of man, humans have striven to explain the many mysteries of the universe, and to justify our existence in it. Throughout this journey of self-understanding, numerous standpoints on human existence have evolved and merged into a complex, abstract manifestation called religion. However, as the human race has grown and advanced itself, many ideas expressed by religion seem less and less plausible

Religion Vs. Science Essay

1007 words - 4 pages Religion vs. Science The human mind is easily convinced on what the eyes tell the mind. If you see something in front of yourself, you might have an easier time believing, than if one was to tell a story. Religion is a story that has been told for thousands of years, and not till technology has ripened have scientists disproved many beliefs. It is now that mankind lets religion restrain the mind from portraying the truth about life

Science Vs. Religion Essay

2301 words - 10 pages One of the great public battlegrounds in modern time is science vs. religion. Is this the great unwinnable war, or is there a common ground? I suggest that the issue is not either side is absolutely right or wrong; the issue in our public discourse, in our public theology, is the misinformation both sides present and the failure to understand the complexity of information. As Donald Rumsfeld might say, it is "the unknown known" - a failure to