Sentencing Of Juveniles Essay

2558 words - 10 pages

The Sentencing of Juveniles

Today, we live in a society faced with many problems, including crime and the fear that it creates. In the modern era, juveniles have become a part of society to be feared, not rehabilitated. The basis of the early juvenile justice system was to rehabilitate and create safe havens for wayward youth. This is not the current philosophy, although the U.S. is one of the few remaining countries to execute juveniles. Presently, our nation is under a presidential administration that strongly advocates the death penalty, including the execution of juveniles. The media and supporters of capital punishment warn of the "superpredator," the juvenile with no fear, remorse, or conscience. Opponents of this view encourage the idea that another death is only revenge, not deterrence. We will examine the rights allotted to juvenile offenders, and the punishments inflicted upon them for violations of the law.

Juvenile Transfers and Waivers

For those juveniles deemed dangerous, or those that have committed a serious crime, a different process would follow their initial contact with the court. This involves the removal of the offender from the juvenile system, to be transferred to the adult criminal court. These offenders are adjudicated as an adult if certain factors are present. The waiver to the adult court is often a critical step in receiving a harsh sentence for juveniles. Two Supreme Court cases have addressed the issue of juvenile waivers and transfers, Kent v. United States and Breed v. Jones. The two cases resulted in specific requirements for transfer hearings, including a) a legitimate transfer hearing b) sufficient notice to family and defense attorney c) right to counsel d) a statement regarding reason for the transfer. However, the waiver of juveniles is often criticized by experts for various reasons. "Minors are likely to be looked upon as special persons by prosecutors, probation officers, and judges in the criminal courts. They are younger than the main population of defendants before the criminal courts…while a minor may be looked upon as a hardened criminal in the juvenile court, (s)he may be viewed as a mere innocent youngster in criminal court." (Abadinsky 72). Some research has shown that the transfer of juveniles is a waste of both time and money. Why? Because the offender often receives the same treatment or sentence as they would had they remained in the juvenile system. For example, New York's system has been criticized on the ground that seventy percent of juvenile offenders arraigned in adult court are waived to juvenile court. Of the remaining children who are tried in adult court, forty percent get probation; only three percent of juvenile offenders tried in adult court received longer sentences than they would have been given in juvenile court.(Allinson). There are options available when sentencing juveniles, before deciding on the ultimate sentence of death. Although, the alternatives discussed...

Find Another Essay On Sentencing of Juveniles

Juveniles Tried in Court Essay

1628 words - 7 pages more juveniles from committing serious crimes (Rubin 2 of 4). In the 1960’s young people got the same punishment as adults. As time went on people realized that a child’s brain doesn’t have the ability to see the consequences. (Landau 88). In some cases youth are eligible for a pretrial when a life sentence cannot be given. A better option would be jail or prison time and the putting the person on probation or parole (SENTENCING 1 0f 2). By

Juvenile Offenders Serving an Adult Sentence

1021 words - 5 pages still has many different answers. Some people say that juveniles should get life in prison, while others say it is too harsh of a punishment. There are also split answers as to whether they should be sent to an adult prison or not. Juveniles should be tried as adults, but depending on the severity of the case, should not be punished the same. When sentencing juveniles age is a fixed factor that determines what the punishment is. I surveyed

Juvenile Delinquency: Is there a solution?

926 words - 4 pages , but crimes. For instance, if a juvenile commits a crime, such as murder or grand theft, they are sent to county jail or state prison. As a result, incarceration is one of the possible sentencing categories that juveniles could be given. Then, the second sentencing category for juvenile delinquents is non-incarceration. Non-incarceration is a sentencing that involves no type of confinement and is given to juveniles who commit non-severe acts

Juvenile and Adult Courts: A Comparative Analysis

1833 words - 7 pages . (2002). The Sentencing Project: Prosecuting Juveniles in Adult Court.2. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. December (2003). Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved August 30, 2005, from University of Phoenix Web site: .3. Kalinich, D., Klofas, J

Transfer to Adult Criminal Court

1025 words - 5 pages There are times where a juvenile may be eligible for transfer to adult criminal court. There are certain criteria that must be met for this to happen, and there is a strong belief that juveniles who commit serious offenses would be more appropriately dealt with by criminal (or adult) courts (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). Juveniles are capable of committing the same serious offenses that adults do. Therefore, with the requirements of a transfer being met

A Critical Look in Current Events Facing Juveniles in the Juvenile Justice System

2369 words - 9 pages in these types of circumstances where the cognitive capacity of a minor is not being considered it's a no win situation for juveniles in the justices system. Like cognitive reasoning debate the strict mandatory sentencing for juvenile crimes is founded on the belief that juveniles will know how harshly the juvenile justice system is cracking down on certain crimes. The Main problem I have with this is that most juveniles aren't even

Mandatory Sentencing

1978 words - 8 pages . The evidence is clear the more exposure to the criminal justice system those juveniles receive the deeper they will penetrate into the system. It has been shown that incarceration of a juvenile has little positive effect. What happens in many cases is the detainees learn from their fellow inmates how to be a better criminal.It is clear that such sentencing does not act as a deterrent to crime. However if we can keep the juveniles off the prison

Can Age be a good excuse in a case of juvenile delinquency?

1015 words - 5 pages giving a right penalty for a juvenile delinquent count as an education? Purpose of sentencing criminals is to teach them the right thing and give them a time to think about their action. While criminals are imprisoned, they will have a chance to regret their action and reborn as a new person. But if people keep lessening juveniles’ sentence and excusing them from their action, juvenile delinquents won’t learn about responsibility and reiterate same

Juveniles Treated Like Adults

1776 words - 7 pages Everyday a vast number of brutal crimes occur somewhere in America. Teens as young as thirteen commit murder, rape, and burglary to an extent. What can be done about it? The best answer I can think of is to treat juveniles like adults. They have just as much responsibility and knowledge of their actions just as adults do, so they deserve the same punishment if they commit the same crime. Believe it or not, teens commit the same level of crimes

Juveniles and Adult Time

2313 words - 10 pages Jordan’s are some of the hardest and lengthiest processes that the court systems will have to endure. Like every argument there are always two opposing sides. With the topic of treating juveniles as adults there is a side that says that, yes; it should be considered as an option for sentencing juveniles for harsh crimes. The arguments of this side of the discussion say that in the end, the result of the crime committed is the same regardless if it

The Chastised Children of America

935 words - 4 pages stance towards juveniles. They “predicted a coming wave of violent juvenile crime: ‘superpredators,’ as young as 11, committing crimes in ‘wolf packs.’” (Garinger, 2012) Unfortunately politicians were none the wiser and were fearful of this upcoming wave and pushed for judicial support. Eventually the criminologists recanted their theory and changed their stance entirely; asking the court to lighten up on adolescent sentencing. Fortunately for

Similar Essays

Juvenile Justice Essay

869 words - 3 pages What Happened to Juvenile Justice?      There is a great deal of controversy over the trying and sentencing of juvenile offenders today. Many will argue that because the severity of Juvenile crimes has risen, the severity of its consequences should rise; however, no matter how serious the crime is, juvenile offenders tried as adults receive far worse than they deserve. The majority of Juveniles tried as adults are

Should Juveniles Be Tried In The Adult Criminal Justice System?

730 words - 3 pages Imagine sitting in a courtroom, hoping the the judge will not give a harsh sentence. Unfortunately, that’s the case for many juveniles, some as young as 13! A juvenile is subject to a more severe sentence with the limited sentencing available. It is estimated that 250,000 youth are prosecuted as adults, each year. This number should change, as juveniles are not adults, both mentally and physically. Juveniles need an environment surrounded

Juvenile Violence Essay

879 words - 4 pages . Juveniles Tried As Adults 3 Sentencing juveniles to adult prisons is not only immoral, but the impact of sentencing juveniles in adult courts falls unequally on the minority youth. For example, non-white youths in California are eight times more likely than white youths to be sentenced by an adult court to incarceration in a youth facility and three times more likely to be transferred to adult court for trial and sentencing (Young, L. 2004). This

Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults?

989 words - 4 pages under 18 are immature, irresponsible, susceptible to peer-pressure and often capable of change.” However, the justices have not yet applied this same logic when considering the sentencing and housing of juveniles in the adult system. If juveniles are “immature, irresponsible, susceptible to peer-pressure and often capable of change,” then why wouldn’t this logic be regarded for the juveniles who face prison in the adult system? Young