Should America Lauch An Attack On Iraq

1368 words - 5 pages

Should We Remove Saddam Hussein From Power?Introduction:I.Lack of support received from United Nations LeadersA.Bush's address towards the U.N. 9/11 was viewed as unsubstantial1.United Nations leaders voiced their belief that to an attack on Iraq would be against U.N. policy.2.Pew pole states American public 70% against unilateral assault without foreign backing.B.Domestically politicians voicing opposition for immediate attack1.Don Nickles, Oklahoma Senator 2nd Republican in seniority for the Senate, is against invasion.2.Tom Daschle, majority leader for the senate, is against preemptive strike.II.Lack of evidence to support immediate actionA.Republicans advocating preventive action towards Iraq unable to substantiate with evidence1.Don Nichols justification for entering Iraq based un unknown, not known.2.President Bush using good vs. evil propagandaIII.Flawless victory over Iraq complete impossibilityA.U.S. Military faces severe causalities of war1.Iraq will utilize urban warfare to place American soldiers at a disadvantageB.Removing Saddam Hussein from authority will cause inevitable power vacuum leading to increased terrorist activity1.History dictates that America will not stick around long enough to protect Iraqi innocent.2.American interference without due cause will lead to an expansion of derision towards U.S. resulting in amplified terrorist action.Conclusion:Not Simply the Lack of Tension but the Presence of Justice"Problems can not be solved at the same level of awareness that created them." (Albert Einstein, 1879-1955) The current question of whether or not the U.S. should invade Iraq unsubstantiated and without allies can easily be answered using the aforementioned axiom. President George W. Bush, alongside supplementary antagonists, is ignoring what common sense dictates and foolishly advocating assaulting Iraq, an impoverished nation, headed by a prior to defeated dictator. Bush's assault faces a triple threat in that it must be carried out with out the support of those whom have historically been American allies, in that it must be undertaken without the disposition of sufficient substantiating evidence against Iraq, and most condemningly in that any successes will be greatly tarnished by excess casualties.One year after a terrible attack on the American way of life, President Bush addressed United Nations leaders vowing to lead a second such assault. Bush stated that the U.N. needed to employ a unilateral approach towards reinstating weapons inspectors into Iraq with the purpose of tallying the number of chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons present in the Iraqi arsenal. Despite various admonishments provided by Bush, U. N. leaders seemed to retort the presidents comments with skepticism. Witness to said proceedings Michael Elliot, responded in his chronicle of the days events by stating that "by threatening unilateral action the Bush administration may have succeeded in rousing its allies to press more actively for an...

Find Another Essay On Should America lauch an attack on Iraq

Attack On America Essay

1262 words - 5 pages felt a low rumble which quickly got louder and started shaking the building. All of a sudden it felt like the whole building shook, and the first thing that went through my mind was "What the hell was that?". At first I thought it might've been an earthquake so I looked out my window and I noticed the sheets of paper falling from above, and I saw the black, billowy smoke filling the sky. I then told everyone on my floor to get to the stairs

Critique of Article Titled "An American Attack on Iraq is not Justified"

822 words - 3 pages "An American Attack on Iraq is Not Justified" was written by John E. Farley in 2002 when congress was considering a resolution to the 9-11 attacks. Farley is a professor of sociology at Southern Illinois University and still participates in war protests to this day. Farley's argument is exactly what the title states, a war in Iraq is not justifiable. The United States ultimately went to war against Iraq on March 19, 2003. Since then, the

Voltaire's Candide as an Attack on Optimism

1325 words - 5 pages Voltaire's Attack on Optimism in Candide      Leibnitz emphasized, in his Discours de Metaphysique (Discourse on Metaphysics) (1686) the role of a benevolent creator. He called the constituent components of the universe monads, and while the philosophy of monads is of little concern to readers of Candide, the conclusion which Leibnitz drew from these monads is crucial to an understanding of optimism.             Leibnitz argued

The annuncement of the attack on Iraq by President George Bush on January 16, 1991

639 words - 3 pages biological weapons program, the President of the United States clearly stated that the reason for going to war with Iraq was the move them out of Kuwait and bring back peace in both countries. However, in the speech given by President George Bush announcing the attack on Iraq, he stated certain things that lead people to believe that his motive for the war was otherwise.Prior to the Gulf War, it was well known amongst the world that the United States

A Single Eye As An Attack on Puritanism

2805 words - 11 pages A Single Eye As An Attack on Puritanism The seventeenth century was a tumultuous time in England; rife with revolution she saw her governmental system, religious affairs and legal code completely overhauled. All across Europe this type of change was common, but England's changes were brought about largely by the influences of and reactions to a variation of Calvinist Protestantism known as Puritanism. Its followers

Arthur Miller's The Crucible: An Attack on McCarthyism?

776 words - 4 pages -Communist views and accusations pushed the United States into a theatrical and sensitive anti-red state during the first edgy years of the Cold War. At the time of The Crucible ‘s first performance, 1953, many observed it as a direct attack on McCarthyism, the policy of sniffing out Communists similar to the way the “witches” of 1692 were discovered. The favorite targets on McCarthy’s radar were writers and entertainers. Through highly

America Should Spend More on Space Exploration

2333 words - 9 pages space program will be. The solar system holds many mysteries and an untold amount of untapped resources that if not explored and utilized by the United States will be utilized by other Nations. With finite resources on Earth any nation that is able to tap into new resources will be at a tremendous advantage both economically and politically. Space exploration also has positive international benefits as well as inspiring young people to enter

America Should Spend More on Space Exploration

1419 words - 6 pages elaborate on these advances and discoveries in this research paper. To understand and appreciate why space exploration should be continued, its achievements must be revealed. The science behind space exploration impacts so much more then one might have originally assumed. According to Kristen Kumar, “Important technology areas that have been impacted by space exploration research include; human health, space power and energy storage, life

Hollywood's Attack on Religion, from the book Hollywood vs. America by Michael Medved

1605 words - 6 pages The section that I have chosen to analyze from the book Hollywood vs. America is "The Attack on Religion." In this part of the book, Michael Medved discusses the shift in attitude Hollywood has made toward religion, from acceptable to contemptible. He takes a look at the messages being sent in films, music and television in the last 15 to 20 years and analyzes their effects. In general, Hollywood depicts religion in an unfavorable manner

The War on Terrorism is an Attack on American Civil Liberties

832 words - 3 pages The War on Terrorism is an Attack on American Civil Liberties After the attacks on 9/11 our country has been forced to confront the issue of terrorism.  The war on terrorism has ignited a war on our civil liberties.  Our civil liberties have been affected by the passing of the Patriot Act, the violation of privacy, and an increase in racial profiling. Civil liberties have been affected immensely by the Patriot Act.  A brief definition of

Review of American Policy regarding the War on Terror in Afghanistan and Iraq. Predominant sources were Bob Woodward's "Plan of Attack" and "Bush at War."

1955 words - 8 pages of slipstream into which reluctant nations and leaders can get behind."Critics allege that Woodward was 'easy' on President Bush in Bush at War and only slightly more critical of the administration in Plan of Attack. This may be due in part to the sway in public opinion as the nation gear up for war in Iraq. There is a sense in Woodward's account that the war in Afghanistan was somehow justified or more justified than the war in Iraq.The

Similar Essays

Should America Attack Iran Or Stick With Diplomacy?

1283 words - 5 pages There has been an on going dispute with Iran's ambition of building weapons of mass destruction. Many might agree that they too have the right to build the nuclear weapons like most other countries, while others believe it would be a big mistake. With that being said, the question that arises is how should we prevent Iran from building these weapons of mass destruction? There are two sides that have a different approach to this issue. The hard

America Should Not Withdraw Its Troops From The War In Iraq

822 words - 3 pages die. Nobody wants to turn on their TV on a daily basis and see havoc wrought by terrorists." Leaving Iraq would give terrorists what they want. They want to take advantage of the instability that would result from having no strong Iraqi government. That is why America the brave, should stand up for what she believes in! We need to finish what we start and help improve the country of Iraq, and give them the freedom they deserve! We can show other

An American Attack On Iraq Was Not Justified

1514 words - 6 pages "An American Attack on Iraq Was Not Justified" The 2003 Iraq War lasted less than three weeks. It began in the early morning hours of March 20, when American missiles struck Baghdad. By April 9, U.S. forces had advanced into Baghdad. By April 15 Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had vanished, and U.S. and allied officials pronounced the end of major combat operations. Although the war itself was short, arguments over whether it was justified had

The U.S. War In The Middle East: A Fight For Honor And Survival Why America Should Continue Fighting In Iraq

1173 words - 5 pages evil dictator Saddam Hussein from power, Americans unthinkingly demanded that the troops be removed from the Middle East. Although it is true that the Middle Eastern wars are deadly and costly, the United States of America must stay in order to protect America, spread freedom to the less fortunate, and demonstrate important, honorable ideals for the overall health of America.After the devastating attack on 9/11, the United States was left with