This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Should Doctors Practice Genetic Engineering? Essay

898 words - 4 pages

Image a life in which you will never get sick, a life in which you can take on dangers, knowing that whatever happens, you will get up again knowing that you are healthier than you started. Well then you must have been thinking of a life in which genetic engineering is available. Some people believe that by the use of genetic engineering, doctors can improve the living condition that people undergo every day. Other people believe that genetic engineering should not be practiced do to their belief of it being unethical and immoral. Although it is seen to be immoral and unethical to some, it would lead to unimaginable opportunities to people that cannot find a cure to heal themselves or ...view middle of the document...

First, doctors can make blood cells multiply and clot faster than before, thus reducing the possibilities of having any loss of blood. Second, doctors can cause damaged cells to repair themselves instead of having to be replacing through machines. For example, say that a person’s body had lost control of his or her blood flow due to being shot in the heart. A doctor then can support the heart in rebuilding itself and to regain the influence on the blood supply being sent through that person’s body. Finally, doctors can help the old in gaining and retaining capabilities that they have lost due to change in age. Say that an old man or woman had begun to lose their memory, doctors can undergo a procedure were they will be capable of replacing their damaged or destroyed brain cells with new ones. Through the process of cloning and regenerating, scientists have come up with a way were they can create a new organ or cell basically from any other cell in the body. (“Genetic Engineering” Current Issues: Macmillan Social Library. Detroit: Gate, 2010.)
Do to the ideals of being capable of creating new organs from basically nothing, but any cell of the body will enable doctors to lower the amount of deaths by more than a third. Doctors can start off by using a cell known as stem cell to treat areas such as skin. This process is done by taking a random cell from the body and having it undergo extreme conditions, such as acid baths. Next the cell is manipulated to transform into the cell that is needed. After that the cell is injected into or onto the specified location to either...

Find Another Essay On Should Doctors Practice Genetic Engineering?

Should Canada be allowed to ciontinue with genetic engineering without federal giudelines?

1262 words - 5 pages In the past ten years there has been a rise in a relatively new science, a science that raises alot of controversial questions with very few answers. This science is called Genetic Engineering. In it's simplest terms it is the reordering of a genetic DNA sequence. It is a very controversial science because it leads into moral and ethical issues, as to what can be done with it and what cannot.Canada is one of the few countries without nationwide

Genetic Engineering Essay

2142 words - 9 pages is letting scientists and doctors play god. These doctors are not trying to recreate human science; they are just trying to perfect its flaws. Doctors and scientists have already helped diabetics with their synthetic insulin, and unfertile parents are now able to have children. Those that oppose genetic engineering because doctors are trying to play god, do not realize what genetic engineering has already contributed to our world. Society should

Dangers and Benefits of Genetic Engineering in Humans

1747 words - 7 pages . There can be much benefit to gain from new techniques, such as the ability to alter the human genome. But even then, many question the morals of genetic experimentation, and some want to rid the world of it completely. Should questionable ethics be grounds to stop research in this particular field? Most definitely not. Modern scientific progress, such as genetic engineering could solve many of the problems that humans face daily. Genetic

Genetic Engineering

935 words - 4 pages cure diseases and disorders is beneficial to parents, children, and society. However, using genetic engineering to create super-children with superior intellects and perfect features is wrong. Science and technology has its place in helping the human race. It should be used to save lives and improve the quality of lives. Using scientific research to appease parent's vanity hurts us as a race. It will create divisions between the "master-race" and

The Potential of Human Genetic Engineering

1703 words - 7 pages . If doctors were able to locate the genes which cause genetic diseases in humans as many have already done, we could potentially, through genetic engineering, rid the human race of genetic disease and make sure that all humans get off to the same genetic start. This will insure that every baby born is not hindered in their ability to grow and develop by a genetic disease, giving every child an equal opportunity to experience life to the fullest

The Ethics of Genetic Engineering and "Designer Babies"

1496 words - 6 pages the practice of depriving unborn children from their genetic independence and destroying an original identity. This practice must be approached as a mean to ensure human health and welfare, not a means to turn natural endowments into socially controlled endowments. Legislation should reflect this mentality in regards to research into genetic engineering for cosmetic purposes and this practice should not be government funded and probably illegal

Perfect Society: The Effects of Human Genetic Engineering

1628 words - 7 pages engineering should not be pursued as it has the potential to cause an unwanted genetic divide in the society. Not only is human genetic engineering used for creating these perfect babies, but also for finding cures to disease. This is called genetic modification. If we were all to undergo genetic modification would this limit our genetic diversity? Could there be a danger that our gene pool diminishes and that as a population we become more susceptible

This essay depicts the morality of genetic engineering

1320 words - 5 pages to come. (Devine) When used ethically, its purpose should be solely for corrections to alterations in the DNA sequence or genetic diseases and illnesses. Though there is much controversial talk on the topic of genetic engineering; however, with all this talk a very intricate and important question arises: May genetic engineering have moral or ethical consequences? To efficiently approach this question one must fully grasp the knowledge and

Is Genetic Engineering Superior or Appalling?

1613 words - 6 pages do research on for trying to heal cancer. Mice are known to be able to develop a cancer jean much like human beings. Therefore, it makes mice the best animals to test on for cancer. Pigs and sheep are also being used in genetic engineering. Scientists and doctors believe it is possible to make organs in the pig’s and sheep’s body’s to fit human body’s. Scientists can use human blood and cross it with the animal’s blood to make the organ of the

Genetic Engineering is Unethical

1135 words - 5 pages (Epstein 5). Others argue that such inventions as human clones, which are genetically constructed humans, and other genetically created figures, are wrong and should be stopped (Epstein 5). Overwhelming textual evidence proves that genetic engineering is not beneficial to society. Accordingly, genetic engineering is unethical and therefore should be stopped. One reason why genetic engineering should cease is because genetic engineering disrupts

Genetic Engineering and Experimentation

1103 words - 5 pages how the gene(s) will react in a human unless they use humans to experiment on? This brings up some pretty rough ethnical issues. Some say genetic engineering is like “Playing God,” meanwhile others are focused on the benefits of it, like the already mentioned disease-riddance. Those that see it as “Playing God” go on the philosophy that God made you the way you are for a reason, so you should be happy with who your are. (I’ll get to my opinion

Similar Essays

Should Genetic Engineering Be Banned? Essay

1611 words - 6 pages should work in an open society, in full consultation with politicians and consumer/environmental groups?BibliographyPublished sources:Howard, T., and Rifkin, J., Who should play God? : The artificial creation of life and what it means for the future of the human race ( New York, Delacorte Press, 1977)Karp, L.E., Genetic engineering, threat or promise? (Chicago, Nelson-Hall, 1976).Lipkin, M., and Rowley, P.T., Eds., Genetic responsibility: on choosing

Genetic Engineering: Humans Should Not Play God

3484 words - 14 pages applications of genetic engineering that people fear are far-fetched.  Right now, only gender and a certain few genetic diseases can be identified.  When those applications do become feasible, they will eliminate inherited diseases and biological inheritance.   Genetic engineering has already raised many controversial issues with doctors, ethicists, religious groups and politicians.  Should parents screen for children who would be

The Fda Should Prohibit Genetic Engineering

2469 words - 10 pages system to which we should not have access.  Because scientists cross these "natural species boundaries" by genetic alteration, because the newly formed organisms "would never occur in nature," and because we lack sufficient testing or knowledge of repercussions, the process of genetic engineering is unethical and should be ceased.   It all began in the early 1970's, when microscopic bacteria were genetically manipulated to consume oil

Gene Therapy And Genetic Engineering: Should It Be Approved In The Us?

3126 words - 13 pages . In the future, this technique may allow doctors to treat a disorder by inserting a gene into a patient's cell instead of using drugs or surgery." The future of Genetic Engineering is predicted to save many lives if deemed safe and effective. However, consequences must be kept in mind if therapy fails, the body has an unpredicted reaction, or if there are side effects that are non-reversible. The social and economic gap would greatly increase