Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

783 words - 4 pages

Have you ever thought that you are a human clone? Think about someday you realize that you are human clone and you are designed for real person’s health care. You might shock with the truth and could not accept the truth. Following the research, VCU Life Sciences Surveys, in 2002, research into human cloning is just 23%. In 2010, research into human cloning is about 35%. If human cloning be allowed, these researches will happen more frequently. Although some scientists and ethicists agree with human cloning, there are more evidence that human cloning yields negative results.
Opponents of banned human cloning claim that human have the right to clone themselves. They insist that human cloning is problem of individual choice and individual choice should be guaranteed if individual choice do not damage to other people. (Kerry, 2006) Also, they claim that human have right to choose the ways of breeding like the right to choose the ways of cure of contraception and sterility. However, human cloning is not way of breeding. Human cloning is means of manufacture. Also, human cloning infringes on having own identity rights. This means that human cloning infringes a right to ask that there is only me in the world. So, people do not allow cloning themselves because there should be only they in the world.
Opponents also maintain that human cloning contribute to the advanced medical science. For example, in America, chemists sold medicine after animal testing but, it did not work well and after taking medicine, deformed children were born. Therefore, for numerous lives, some human cloning’s sacrifice is needed. However, human cloning could not be justified for selfish purposes. For instance, think about that one human clone is born to cure someone’s disease. After the cure, “he will be treated as a freak, set apart from others, the object of tiring scientific and public curiosity, and exposed to unending physical and psychological testing.” (Thomas) In addition, does the human clone’s goal of life disappeared? Who are born for someone in the world? Is there anything like this inhumane act except human cloning?
The final argument advanced by opponents of banned human cloning is that human cloning is the creation of an organism that is an exact genetic copy of another, so it will cure diseases as quickly as...

Find Another Essay On Should Human Cloning Be Banned?

Should Human Cloning Be Pursued? Essay

1209 words - 5 pages cell divide into a blastocyst (“What Is Cloning?”). There are two main controversial types of cloning that come from SCNT which are reproductive and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning involves the creation of another life and should be banned. “In therapeutic cloning … there [is no] implantation into the uterus to create a child” (Murnaghan). It is used to create stem cells for medical use and can save lives. The medical possibilities of

Human Cloning Should be Permitted Essay

1435 words - 6 pages Human Cloning Should be Permitted What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed

Human Cloning Should be Condemned

614 words - 2 pages Human Cloning Should be Condemned   On November 25, 2001, the news that a firm called Advanced Cell Technology had created human embryos by cloning added new urgency to Congress's and the nation's deliberations on this issue.   This past summer, by a 265-to-162 margin, the House of Representatives passed a carefully worded ban on human cloning (H.R. 2505) which President Bush has said he will sign into law. The leadership

Should Human Cloning be Permitted?

2064 words - 9 pages people oppose the practice of human cloning owing to different scientific, religious and ethical perspectives. People in favor of human cloning claim that it will not only facilitate biologists in medical field but it will also allow infertile couples to have children and let other people to bring back their loved ones. However, it should not be legalized because it is considered immoral and unethical in many religions; it diminishes the genetic

Human Cloning - Is it right? Is it wrong? This essay debates human cloning from a Christian perspective. The final answer is no; human cloning should be banned

706 words - 3 pages . God created us with our own qualities. We aren't perfect. We shouldn't expect to be. We shouldn't try to correct how God has made us. If we do, we are saying that He who created the Universe and its complexity has made a mistake. That isn't possible.Scientists have high hopes about cloning and what it might bring. They are talking about setting back the biological clocks and even giving immortality. Regenerating human parts is one of these

Human Cloning Should Not be Permitted

4387 words - 18 pages continuing cloning research and those who are staunchly opposed to it.  Meanwhile, despite public opinion, science trudges on behind closed doors working to clone the first human. This paper will first provide a thorough, but brief, introduction into the topic of cloning itself, including its history and its mechanisms; then, through a series of carefully thought out points, it will illustrate why human cloning should not be allowed to continue at

Should Human Reproductive Cloning Be Legal

1004 words - 5 pages . By allowing scientists to have their way with reproductive cloning, we would be treating everyone involved, such as: surrogate mothers, donors of DNA, and the clones themselves, all as a tool. Everyone included would be subjugated to the scientists’ way. By going against both chief views of Kantianism, this first option is for all intents and purposes, null. The second option is that human cloning should not be permissible and should be banned

Human Cloning Should Not Be Regulated

1084 words - 4 pages these breakthroughs in their sights, would be forced to take their experiments underground to avoid political repercussions.           The opposition insists on the regulation of cloning and is suggesting a permanent ban, arguing that cloning in any way is unethical.  Some take the position that scientists can not be trusted, ethically, to know when the experiments should stop, therefore, the scientific community would be unable to effectively

This is a retorical-persuasive speech i had to do on cloning- should it be banned? Should legal rights over turn moral rights? please note, this was not designed to show a 'christian' perspective

1139 words - 5 pages of God. We can not make life, or even take it away. We are here by the wishes of God and we shall return to him. The Book of Ecclesiastes, chapter 12, verse 7 says: And the spirit shall return unto God who gave it". God gave us life, we should not be tampering with human cloning. Trying to act, or even be on the same level as God is dangerous, not only for the individual human, but for human life itself.When the experiments for Dolly, the first

Should steroids be banned?

825 words - 4 pages The third argument presented is that even if steroids are banned, they should not be banned from sports because there are a multitude of other risks already associated with sports, and steroids increase competition. Just last year, a media car ran Johnny Hoogerland off the road during the Tour de France, sending him headlong into barbed wire. Redskins quarterback Joe Theismann famously had his leg broken and career ended mid-game, and the

Should Boxing Be Banned?

2165 words - 9 pages be a safe and fun sport as long as it is practiced and played properly. Boxing should not be banned because it can help relieve stress, and like running it is a good addition for getting in shape. It should also not be banned because boxers know the risks and they still choose to do it ; it is their choice not the community's. Another reason not to ban boxing would be because if boxing is banned it will be enforced by people who still like it

Similar Essays

Should Human Cloning Be Banned? Essay

937 words - 4 pages Physicians and scientists joined the chorus of “Thou Shalt Not Clone Humans!”(Pence 1). Since the creation of Dolly, there has been a long debate about the correct practice of biotechnology and inspiring the expectable imaginations of the public (MacKinnon 3). In the end, we always come back to one specific debate. Should human cloning be banned? Cloning is immoral and we would see clones as products for our use or as “test tube babies”. The

Human Reproductive Cloning Should Be Banned

1053 words - 4 pages Human Reproductive Cloning Should be Banned The issues concerning human reproductive cloning are shrouded in controversy, perhaps overshadowing the true advantages of cloning technology. Therapeutic cloning, which is often misunderstood as reproductive cloning, is less controversial than the latter as it does not involve the creating of an individual being. Instead, vital stem cells are extracted from human embryos, in order to generate

Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned

2939 words - 12 pages Proposition: Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned.The news of the successful cloning of an adult sheep, in which the sheeps DNA was inserted into an unfertilized sheep egg to produce a lamb with identical DNA, has generated an outpour of ethical concerns. These concerns are not about Dolly, the now famous sheep, nor even about the considerable impact cloning may have on the animal breeding industry, but rather about the possibility of cloning

Human Cloning Should Be Banned (Negative) Argumentative Speach

1763 words - 7 pages that there are still human and have the same rights as their siblings. Society has already accepted illegitimate son's, it will be a small matter of time after they start cloning people that society will indeed accept them as people aswell.The case that has indeed captured the hearts and mind of many sci-fi authors, what will happen if a powerful leader gets his hand on technology could bring down evil onto his country. Thing is that in our