Should Outdoor Smoking Be Banned Essay

1807 words - 7 pages

In the United States, twenty-five percent of U.S. citizens, over the age of fifteen, smoke cigarettes (Cohan and George 1). Citizens smoke cigarettes to experience the effects of nicotine, a drug that calms your brain, which is located in the tobacco smoke. The nicotine drug is awful for the human body; however, it is very addictive causing humans to crave the drug. The leading cause of diseases and premature death is tobacco, which results in 440,000 deaths per year in the United States; tobacco smoke is a huge problem causing health issues from asthma and lung cancer (Cohan and George 1). Even though many people do not smoke, they may still have these health issues due to the exposure to secondhand smoke (Sureda et. al. 766). The severe issue of secondhand smoking involves inhaling the tobacco smoke from surrounding smokers (Kozlowski 21). The process of smoking outside your home has limited and become much harder to accomplish due to certain restrictions (Kozlowski 21-22). The smoking restrictions, which are spreading around the world, are ranging from smoking in restaurants to even outside public beaches and parks (Bell 99; Kozlowski 21) Smokers across the U.S. are angered because they believe that there freedoms are being infringed upon, but secondhand smoking is destroying future lives to nonsmokers (Sureda et. al. 767).
There are many places around the world that have expanded the ban on smoking to outside public places such as Vancouver, Canada, which has slowly increased the ban throughout the city (Bell 105). In 2000, Vancouver banned smoking in all enclosed locations including restaurants, bars, and nightclub (Bell 105). Then seven years later the smoking ban continued as bus stops and café patios were now included (Bell 105). Furthermore, the following year the ban further expanded by adding that smokers must be 6 meters away from business entrances (Bell 105). Then, finally, the law passed that smokers are no longer able to smoke in outdoor places such as beaches and parks (Bell 105). The spread of the smoking ban is destroying people freedoms and liberty (Kozlowski 21). Arthur Gallagher, an agitated smoker, argues, “How far can the government go to stop the minority from engaging in the pleasures of liberty, to enjoy a nice cigarette? (Kozlowski 21)” The government is preventing smokers from smoking in most indoor places and now it is spreading to outdoor public places (Kozlowski 21). Therefore, to protect the rights and freedoms of smokers, there should be no ban for smoking outdoors (Sureda et. al. 767).
A big issue that arises as smoking bans expand to outdoors public places is the harassment of many smokers from nonsmokers (Bell 100). There have been several incidents in where this has happened. Kirsten Bell, who executed a study on smoking bans, physically saw multiple incident where mistreatment took place (Bell 100) One story begins as Kirsten approached a public bus and was greeted politely by the driver. They drove several...

Find Another Essay On Should Outdoor Smoking be Banned

Should Smoking Be Banned or Taxed?

1137 words - 5 pages - American Lung Association." American Lung Association. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Apr. 2014. "Should Cigarette Smoking Be Banned?" The Premier Online Debate Website. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Apr. 2014. "What Happens When You Quit Smoking?" Healthline. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.

Smoking in Public Spaces Should be Banned

2100 words - 8 pages Imagine you and your family are at a nice restaurant, waiting to enjoy a great meal, or so you think. As you lean in to take that first bite, a puff of smoke surrounds you, your family, and your food. How pleasant is this? A big topic being brought to attention these days is whether or not smoking should be banned from all restaurants and other public areas. Smoking in public areas should be taken into close consideration. There are

Should Smoking be banned? By Asif

1267 words - 5 pages inhales it.The cigarette paper influences how quickly the cigarette burns.A cigarette can be ventilated to reduce the effects of smoke, which reduces the delivery of tar.Cigarette smoke can be described as one of the world's most complex mixtures. Approximately 4,000 constituents burn when tobacco burns.Passive SmokingPassive smoking is when you inhale the smoke exhaled from a smoker's lungs. Second-hand smoke poses a threat to health and should

Why Smoking Should Not Be Banned

675 words - 3 pages Why Smoking Should Not Be BanSmoking is a source of great controversy, and most individuals either support it or oppose it. Almost no middle ground exists on the topic of tobacco smoking, and individuals against smoking have taken great strides to promote the cessation of smoking in public places. Unfortunately, this has led to the formation of numerous laws that forbid smoking in specific public places like restaurants, bars, parks, and in some

Ban on Smoking-Why Smoking should be Banned!

887 words - 4 pages treat. Cigarette smoking is also highly addictive, which makes it continuously prevalent in society. Addiction makes it very difficult for those who start smoking cigarettes to stop, and is a constant worry and annoyance to those around the smoker. Being exposed to cigarette smoke can cause many of the same illnesses that smokers suffer from, which can result in the death of those who don't smoke. Consequently, cigarettes should be banned because

Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places

1315 words - 5 pages Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet. Tobacco is the substance that is in these cigarettes. These tobacco products are promoted through tobacco ads that are found almost everywhere you turn. They

Smoking should be banned all over the United States

1667 words - 7 pages taken. I believe that the production of cigarettes should be banned across the U.S to prevent any diseases from occurring which would save thousands of lives. As mentioned before, numerous diseases have been associated with smoking. Diseases such as 'lung cancer, mouth cancer, and throat cancer'(Buzzle, 13) are just a few that have been mentioned. Other diseases include: Peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, coronary heart

Should Smoking be banned in public places in Ontario?

1182 words - 5 pages Imagine being at a nice restaurant, waiting to enjoy a great meal. Leaning in to takethat first bite, a puff of reeking cigarette smoke surrounds the food, and it is not verypleasant. A debatable topic that has brought on numerous attention is whether or notsmoking should be banned in public areas in Ontario, such as restaurants. Smoking inpublic areas should be taken into great consideration. There are three significant reasonswhy this is

The title is "Smoking: Why It Should Not Be Banned."

1612 words - 6 pages smoking in dorm rooms. Protestors of the tobacco/smoking industry cite many reasons for wanting to ban cigarettes, including economical, environmental, and health reasons. However, it should not be up to the government to decide whether or not people can smoke.The first huge reason why smoking should not be made illegal is because it has been proven that prohibition does not work. In 1920, alcoholic beverages were banned in the United States. The

Smoking Should NOT Be Banned in Public Places

737 words - 3 pages Smoking Should Not Be Banned in Restaurants        In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy they prefer. Customers would decide-without the government's help-if they want to avoid smoke-filled rooms or enter them. They might even choose to sit in an area sectioned off for smokers or non-smokers, but the ultimate issue is choice

Nationwide Smoking Ban: Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places

1104 words - 4 pages The effects of second-hand smoke have been well-known for decades; in fact, the Surgeon General warned the public about its dangers in 1972 (Schick & Glantz, 2005). Do people knowingly have the right to put others’ health at risk? No, they do not. Exposure to cigarette smoke is a public health risk. Therefore, smoking should be banned in all public places, nationwide. There has been no attempt to impose a national smoking ban by the U.S

Similar Essays

Should Smoking Be Globally Banned Essay

1020 words - 5 pages , smoking should be globally banned. (Teens Health, 2007). Everyday people breathe in air, but they don’t know that the air is polluted by cigarettes. Smoking doesn’t only harm the user, but also the people surrounding them. Secondhand smoking is when people around them inhale the toxic chemicals that are being released from the smoker. The general public inhales the toxic chemicals in the air. Secondhand smoking is worse than firsthand smoking

Should Cigarette Smoking Be Banned? Essay

1050 words - 5 pages will, which in my opinion is the only durable solution. Ban on smoking should be imposed but not altogether because there are many other things that are harmful to human health like alcohol, bad, unhealthy and junk food. If we keep up like this we will end up banning almost everything that is available out there. Because of the things we eat or use are in one way or the other harmful to humans and those that are not harmful are either illegal or

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places.

875 words - 4 pages "Yes", some people say "No". Now, we are going to examine what opinion the people have in this issue.Some people think smoking should be banned because it can develop lung cancer. Cigarette contains thousands of different organic chemicals. When people who are smoking, the body will absorb a mass of tars, which is harmful the lung. Besides, the nicotine and carbon monoxide, which damage the normal cells of the lung when these chemicals are burnt

Cigarette Smoking Should Not Be Banned

1974 words - 8 pages Should cigarette smoking be banned for everyone in the United States? Why? Why not? Should those who chose their time smoking to relieve stress, personal enjoyment, or simply just because, have to lose their right to what makes them happy? Smoking tobacco products has been around for decades and in many different forms. Should personal rights be pushed aside to please those around us that disagree with the so called “disgusting habit”? In the