This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Should Performance Enhancing Drugs Be Illegal?

691 words - 3 pages

Should performance enhancing drugs be illegal?By Natalia Sledz, 10 RedThe use of Performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) such as anabolic steroids, Human Growth Hormone (HGH), Cocaine and Amphetamine have long been controversial. There has been an on-going argument supporting whether PEDs should be illegal for years. Many say drugs are not worth it and are damaging to drug users and those around them. Although, if drugs were to enhance your sporting ability and enjoyment of sport, why not do whatever it takes to be where you want to be? The use of performance enhancing drugs in the sporting industry benefits everyone's desires; spectators and athletes both get what they want, everyone wins.Why PEDs should be legal has many reasons, but on the other hand why should they be illegal? Health reasons and unfairness to non-drug enhanced athletes are the main barriers to legalisation. However if these barriers were no longer an issue, PEDs would become a natural part of training. If all high level athletes were prepared to accept the risk of health implications, which would double for removing unfairness if everyone is using them, what barriers remain? If athletes don't mind and spectators want to see faster, better, stronger then who is to lose here?"Faster, higher, stronger." - The Olympic Games motto; the use of PEDs by Olympic athletes captures this in the best possible way. This is because PEDs have a positive effect on athletic performance. For example, an athlete using anabolic drugs will increase protein synthesis within muscle cells, causing a build up of muscle tissue, therefore allows the athlete to train at higher levels of intensity (, 9/06/08). Spectators want to see record breaking feats, and what athletes want to break those records. So why should PEDs be illegal when it is necessary for athletes for progress?In other words, "faster, higher, stronger" means that athletes are always pushing the boundaries of achievement. However this is limited by natural human ability. At some point the only way of pushing those limits further is to take PEDs.Another argument...

Find Another Essay On Should performance enhancing drugs be illegal?

Performance Enhancing Drugs Should Not be Allowed in Sports

1247 words - 5 pages considered as cheating is capable of enhancing the athlete?s performance and may result in different changes. It is the drug that enhances the performance and there are many different types of drugs depending on what type of sport. An example would be anabolic agents, Androgenic anabolic steroids (artificial versions of the male hormone testosterone) belong to this class and are one of the more commonly abused prohibited substances. Outside of its

Should performance of enhancing drugs be legal in sports?

640 words - 3 pages Someone once said " If you are not cheating, then you are not trying hard enough". Many athelete wants to do better and therefore, they use steroids. Performance of enhancing drugs should be legal because it helps to boost up energy which helps athelete to play for a long period of time without getting tired. Some may argue that taking steroids lower the muscles strength and increases blood pressure but, I disagree. Steroids helps to increse the

Should athletes take performance enhancing drugs?

1211 words - 5 pages [Type text] Sports Nutrition Press ReleaseThe issue of the use of Performance Enhancing Drugs in sport has been increasingly prevalent in the media of late. With the increase in methods of testing and the increase in availability of some of these drugs, there have been more and more high performing athletes becoming talked about in the media for the wrong reasons.Since the beginning of sport, it is a fact that athletes have

Performance Enhancing Drugs: The Illegal Solution of a Lazy Athlete

1895 words - 8 pages Around the world today, thousands of athletes compete in various sports and competitions at the supreme level. Synonymously with the hard work the players do outside of athletic contests comes the world-wide notorious dilemma of whether Performance Enhancing Drugs (also known as PED's) should or should not be involved in sports. The sports world classifies a PED as any type of substance that may benefit a person athletically or for any any other

Performance Enhancing Drugs

1750 words - 7 pages , and the third group has a smattering of athletes who take drugs and get caught (Bamburger 3). So performance-enhancing drugs should not be used because they give the person using them an unfair advantage, has a high monetary cost to keep getting the drugs, and has many negative side effects.      Not everyone believes that performance-enhancing drugs should be banned. NU football players Jay Tant and Dwayne Missouri both put on about 30 pounds

Legalizing Performance Enhancing Drugs

1582 words - 7 pages performance-enhancing drug, there are also countless other chemicals which could be categorized as such, including stimulants, such as caffeine and amphetamines, any painkillers, sedatives, diuretics that expel water from the body, blood-boosters that increase the oxygen-carrying capacity of red blood cells, anabolic agents, lean mass builders including protein supplements, and any masking drugs (drugs used to disguise traces of other drugs). (Mangan

Banning Performance Enhancing Drugs

1222 words - 5 pages /debate/against.shtml Cook, M. (n.d.). Should Olympic athletes be allowed to use performance-enhancing drugs? Retrieved from Australasian Science: History of Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sports. (2013, August 8). Retrieved from

performance enhancing drugs

1155 words - 5 pages Should performance-enhancing drugs be legalized? The use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) in sports, also known as doping substances, can be traced back to the first Olympic games in Greece (Wada, 2010). This illegal practice, which was then perceived as part of the sport, is now regarded as a serious offence. Just recently in 2012, the court of arbitration (CAS) banned Jan Ulrich, a German cyclist, for a period of two years for using PEDs

Performance Enhancing Drugs

1790 words - 8 pages using steroids at least once. That is a 17% increase since the 1999 survey. Performance enhancing drugs have been a major problem in sports since the mid twentieth century. Whether, people think it is a good thing and makes the game more exciting, or if people think it is cheating and players who take it should be exiled doesn't change the fact that doping has become more and more popular over the years. Performance enhancing drugs are spoiling modern sports. The types of steroids, athletes who use them, and widespread use are tainting the way modern sports are looked at.

Performance Enhancing Drugs

3521 words - 15 pages closest rival” (“Lance Armstrong Biography”). However despite all the success he had in his early life, “Armstrong was diagnosed with testicular cancer and had to go through intensive treatment” (“Lance Armstrong Biography”). When Armstrong returned to competition in 2008, “he had been under intense speculation that he used performance-enhancing drugs from 1999-2005 and in that period was the time he won the Tour de France seven consecutive time

Performance Enhancing Drugs Should Not Affect Baseball’s Record Book

1556 words - 7 pages activity. But, the facts are clear that cheating and drug use, including performance enhancing drugs are not a new problem. If we are to question the feats and records or modern players, the same criteria must also be used for all of baseball history. The former all time leaders in base hits, home runs, and strikeouts have admitted to amphetamine use. And while not illegal at the time they used the drugs, they can still be classified as

Similar Essays

Should Performance Enhancing Drugs Be Banned? Essay

1333 words - 6 pages . We could also see a rise in the use of these drugs by adolescents. For these reasons alone I believe that performance-enhancing drugs should remain illegal for the welfare of athletes. Performance-enhancing drugs should continue to be banned from professional sports because they have side effects that athletes may be unaware of, there is a disadvantage to athletes that do use PED’s and it is unfair to previous athletes who hold records. Individuals may disagree and argue that we should revoke the ban so we will be able to monitor it more safely. If the ban on performance-enhancing drugs was to be lifted who knows what the next illegal drug to become legal will be.

Performance Enhancing Drugs Should Be Banned For Athletes

705 words - 3 pages Performance Enhancing Drugs Should Be Banned For Athletes The use of Performance Enhancing Drugs(PED) has a major impact on athletes negatively and cause many problems in sports and competitions. These PEDs should be banned for athletes and competitors on any level because they are, unhealthy and harmful to the body, give users an edge over competitors, and it diminishes the true sportsmanship of the game itself. The illegal use of

Should Performance Enhancing Drugs Be Legalized In Professional Sports?

1686 words - 7 pages The debate over the legalization of performance enhancing drugs also, known as PEDs, has been on the rise. Performance enhancing drugs are as the illegal drugs or substances that are taken by athletes to improve their performance. The term doping is used to describe the act of using PEDs. In the recent years many famous athletes have been convicted of PEDs abuse. Among these famous athletes is Lance Armstrong, a famous cyclist who won multiple

Should Performance Enhancing Drugs Be Allowed In Sports?

981 words - 4 pages Should performance enhancing drugs be allowed in sports?Performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) are currently prohibited in leading competitive sports around the world. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), brings about the notion that the spirit of the sport is a celebration of the human spirit, body and mind and that doping is fundamentally contrary to what is intrinsically valuable about sport (World Anti-Doping Agency, 2003).The article, 'Why we