Should Smoking Be Permitted In Certain Places?

885 words - 4 pages

Should Smoking be Permitted in Certain Places?Millions of Americans smoke or at one time have smoked. What effect is their smoke on non-smokers and the environment around them? Yes, no one is stopping them from smoking but that is not the issue. The question is ,however, should smokers be allowed to smoke in places such as restaurants, bars, banks, universities, airports, or large sporting areas and other public places around non-smokers.In the past, smokers were accustomed to smoking any where they wanted to but over the last thirty years this freedom has become under close scrutiny. Fifty U.S. cities and over one thousand towns now ban smoking in restaurants and bars (Phillip 13). The problem is with second hand smoke. "Mr. Hagen cites a number of studies that", he says, 'prove beyond a shadow of doubt that tobacco smoke significantly increase the risk of lung cancer and other smoking-related diseases in non smokers'" (Phillip 13). Smokers should be allowed to smoke outdoors under certain circumstances but in in-closed spaces there should be designated areas for smokers. At places such as football stadiums, parks, campuses or anything of that nature, smoking should be allowed. But this in itself creates another problem. More than half of people that are smoking outdoors just toss their cigarette butts in the nearest bush or patch of grass and walk away as if they haven't done anything wrong. This becomes a burden with keeping our campus clean.Smoking Indoors is a whole different ball game. One of the biggest nuisances for some people is the aroma of cigarette smoke. It can be very aggravating when you are in a public restaurant and the whole room is filled with smoke. This can ruin people's appetites and also cause a health problem for people with asthma or other such lung diseases. Twenty years ago non-smokers would have to deal with the smoke or leave the restaurant sick, although recently laws have been mandated to prevent this from ever happening again. Non-smokers should be allowed to eat in restaurants and have work places free of smoke (Califano 65). You could eliminate smoking from indoors completely but then smokers would complain about their rights. Civil Liberties Un-ion president George Blochert says, "It's a true clash of individual rights. The 30% of people who smoke have rights like anyone else, but if tobacco smoke is an irritant to people that share the space, there's a real problem. There should be a compromise where people can smoke in ventilated areas hopefully without bothering non-smokers" (Philip 13). Not only is second hand smoke unappealing, but...

Find Another Essay On Should Smoking be Permitted in Certain Places?

Nationwide Smoking Ban: Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places

1104 words - 4 pages The effects of second-hand smoke have been well-known for decades; in fact, the Surgeon General warned the public about its dangers in 1972 (Schick & Glantz, 2005). Do people knowingly have the right to put others’ health at risk? No, they do not. Exposure to cigarette smoke is a public health risk. Therefore, smoking should be banned in all public places, nationwide. There has been no attempt to impose a national smoking ban by the U.S

Smoking in Public Places Essay

1336 words - 5 pages The best thing to do for your body is to stop smoking and to never start (Thompson 1 of 2). Smoke stays on the walls, floors, clothing and toys smoke is everywhere (HANSSEN 1 of 2). Therefore smoking should be banned in public spaces because it causes harm to the smoker's body, as well as causing unwarranted health and economic problems for the public. People smoke in many places. Buses, hospitals, libraries, restaurants, bars, banks and even

Should Human Cloning be Permitted?

2064 words - 9 pages response towards the transplanted organ. These immune-suppressive drugs are known to cause side effects in the patient’s body. Therapeutic cloning can prove to be helpful in this case because skin cells from the same person will be taken, transformed into stem cells and then they will be used in transplantation. This argument is often supported by saying that there is a shortage of organs and that is why cloning should be permitted. According to some

Human Cloning Should be Permitted

1435 words - 6 pages Human Cloning Should be Permitted What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed

Should surrogate motherhood be permitted?

924 words - 4 pages bothexpert medical and psychological evaluations. Another majorquestion that arises is whether or not the commissioningparents have the right to tell surrogate mother how to live?Can the couple ban smoking, control alcohol, and othersubstance intake? These issues need to be taken into mind beforechoosing a surrogate mother and needs to be stated in thecontract.(1-2)In conclusion, surrogate motherhood raises many legaland ethical dilemmas, especially that

Abortion Should Not be Permitted

1201 words - 5 pages up in the future. Before we continue, let me define some vital terms (proceed to view powerpoint or note-board; define “Viability” “Roe v. Wade” “D&X”). Since so many babies are being killed needlessly, I strongly believe that the court ruling in Roe v. Wade should be limited and enforced with fines, so that it only protects necessary abortions for women in danger. Every year, almost 150,000 women in the US alone have abortions past the first

Should Civil Disobedience Be Permitted In A Democracy?

520 words - 2 pages to advocate violence, the only weapon we have is the weaopon of protest, and the great glory of America should be free to express their opinions." President Kennedy on the other hand states, "defiance of the law leads to the road of tyranny and could lead to an anarchy." Civil disobedience has had a positive effect on society, therefore it should be permitted in a democracy.Civil disobedience is an effective way of changing laws and protecting

Should Civil Disobedience Be Permitted In A Democracy?

520 words - 2 pages to advocate violence, the only weapon we have is the weaopon of protest, and the great glory of America should be free to express their opinions." President Kennedy on the other hand states, "defiance of the law leads to the road of tyranny and could lead to an anarchy." Civil disobedience has had a positive effect on society, therefore it should be permitted in a democracy.Civil disobedience is an effective way of changing laws and protecting

Ban Smoking In Public Places

587 words - 2 pages . Restaurants have smoking tables but this does not prevent the smoke or the smell reaching other tables. Government policy has to be expanded to cover every aspect of smoking in public. It has reached the stage were it is an offence to drink alcohol in the street this should be the same for tobacco. Young children are easily influenced and the sight of a teenager smoking could be the trigger to turn that child into a smoker. Much as we feel sorry for these addicts it is them who made the initial choice. They should not be permitted to force on us. Word Count: 581

Banning Smoking in Public Places

626 words - 3 pages cigarettes, a ban against smoking in public places should be put into motion to protect non-smokers, to improve the health of smokers, and to reduce the overall use of tobacco products among smokers while protecting their rights. Nearly everywhere people go; there is always someone smoking as if there is no way to avoid them. When it comes to the health-risk second-hand smoke is as dangerous as smoking a cigarette. In today’s society, it is rare

Smoking in Public Spaces Should be Banned

2100 words - 8 pages people do not realize the effects of second hand smoke. Smoking is a freedom of choice and is legal for people to do. So until smoking is pronounced illegal and legal actions are taken against it, there is nothing anyone can do to stop it, except banning it from certain places. This in turn will help business and maybe even stop people?s habits altogether. Works Cited Coates, Colin. (2002, Dec. 11) Should Smoking in Public be Banned

Similar Essays

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places.

875 words - 4 pages a non-smoker, thinks smoking in public area should not be prohibited because smokers should have a right and freedom, such as walking on the street or anywhere same as other people. However, if the smokers who are told smoking is prohibited in public places, they will be exploited the right with smoking. He also says he does not favor the odor of smoking and to be surrounded by the people who are smoking, but he thinks everyone should have a

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places In Ontario?

1182 words - 5 pages the bodies major functions. In conclusion, theOntario government should ban smoking in public places because it harms peopleshealth. Citizens should be aware that cigarettes pose only pose as a threat to the health ofboth smokers and nonsmokers. Since cigarettes are the leading cause of preventabledeath, people can try to avoid all the harm smoking can do, and in due course, death.People's lifestyles can be affected negatively because of smoking

Smoking Should Be Banned In All Public Places

1315 words - 5 pages Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet. Tobacco is the substance that is in these cigarettes. These tobacco products are promoted through tobacco ads that are found almost everywhere you turn. They

Smoking Should Not Be Banned In Public Places

737 words - 3 pages Smoking Should Not Be Banned in Restaurants        In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy they prefer. Customers would decide-without the government's help-if they want to avoid smoke-filled rooms or enter them. They might even choose to sit in an area sectioned off for smokers or non-smokers, but the ultimate issue is choice