This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places.

875 words - 4 pages

I remember that when I was child, I saw one public service announcement in the television that was performed by Yul Brynner, who was an actor of "The King and I". In an announcement, he said, "If I hadn't had smoking the cigarette, I would not have talked to you smoking was hazardous the health". An announcement was played after he had died in lung cancer, which was caused by smoking. This announcement gave me deeply impression that cigarette was harmful our health absolutely. However, how many people agree this? Everyday, we hear much news about the people who die from the cancer, which is caused by smoking or passive smoke. It is obvious that smoking not only affects the health of smokers, but also harms other people who are not smoking. So, many people think government should ban the smoking in public place. However, this issue always provides a lot of controversy. Some people say "Yes", some people say "No". Now, we are going to examine what opinion the people have in this issue.Some people think smoking should be banned because it can develop lung cancer. Cigarette contains thousands of different organic chemicals. When people who are smoking, the body will absorb a mass of tars, which is harmful the lung. Besides, the nicotine and carbon monoxide, which damage the normal cells of the lung when these chemicals are burnt. The article says over 4,000 varied chemicals, which can cause cancer, include in the cigarette. According to the evaluation, it has about 164,100 conditions are involved by lung cancer and 156,900 people die of lung cancer in the United States in 2000. ("Facts About Lung Cancer", 2001)Passive smoke is another reason for the people who support for banning smoking in public places. Smoking not only affects smokers but also threatens the life of non-smokers. Passive smoke is created by the flaming and smoking of tobacco products, which contain many carcinogens chemicals, such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide. Non-smokers inhale these chemicals through the air thereby increasing the risk of lung cancer. Besides, many diseases that come from active smoke also affect to the non-smokers. Nasal sinus cancers and the death rate of heart disease are also caused by the passive smoke, which exposes to the air. According to the EPA evaluation, about 3,000 people who are killed by lung cancer, which is developed by passive smoke. Moreover, passive smoke also affects 35,000 to 40,000 non-smokers to develop the heart disease. (Karpilovsky 3)On the other hand, some businessmen think smoking should not be banned due...

Find Another Essay On Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places.

Nationwide Smoking Ban: Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places

1104 words - 4 pages The effects of second-hand smoke have been well-known for decades; in fact, the Surgeon General warned the public about its dangers in 1972 (Schick & Glantz, 2005). Do people knowingly have the right to put others’ health at risk? No, they do not. Exposure to cigarette smoke is a public health risk. Therefore, smoking should be banned in all public places, nationwide. There has been no attempt to impose a national smoking ban by the U.S

Smoking in Public Spaces Should be Banned

2100 words - 8 pages people do not realize the effects of second hand smoke. Smoking is a freedom of choice and is legal for people to do. So until smoking is pronounced illegal and legal actions are taken against it, there is nothing anyone can do to stop it, except banning it from certain places. This in turn will help business and maybe even stop people?s habits altogether. Works Cited Coates, Colin. (2002, Dec. 11) Should Smoking in Public be Banned

Should Smoking Be Banned From Public Places? What Are The Effects Of Smoking? Do We Have The Right To Ban Smoking In Public Places, Taking Into Consideration The Morals And Ethics

1260 words - 6 pages government's point of view, smoking should be limited in certain enclosed and crowded places such as discos, cinemas and public transports. This way, they can still make profit from selling cigarettes and save money from passive smoking diseases. From the 3rd world farmers' who gather the tobacco point of view, smoking should not be banned from public places because they would have no alternate way to make money.Currently, smoking is already the biggest

Smoking Must Be Banned from All Public Places

753 words - 4 pages have adopted a law that prevents smoking in places like restaurants and bars, but that isn’t far enough. Banning smoking in all public places will significantly improve the health of innocent bystanders, which is something the public should want to strive for. More than 42,000 American die each year from smoking without even lighting up a cigarette, including 900 infants (Wanjek). With these statistics, why should smoking in

Smoking Should Be Banned

1012 words - 5 pages Agreement in 1998 the TV adds for cigarette companies were banned. Smoking is a detrimental practice, which even though is carried out by individuals of their own accord, affects the surroundings and thus should be banned. Ever since people started smoking researchers had been searching for its adverse effects to the human body. Fritz Lickint, in 1929 presented formal statistical evidence that cigarette smoking leads to lung cancer. This

Should Smoking be Permitted in Certain Places?

885 words - 4 pages Should Smoking be Permitted in Certain Places?Millions of Americans smoke or at one time have smoked. What effect is their smoke on non-smokers and the environment around them? Yes, no one is stopping them from smoking but that is not the issue. The question is ,however, should smokers be allowed to smoke in places such as restaurants, bars, banks, universities, airports, or large sporting areas and other public places around non-smokers.In the

Smoking in Public Places

1336 words - 5 pages The best thing to do for your body is to stop smoking and to never start (Thompson 1 of 2). Smoke stays on the walls, floors, clothing and toys smoke is everywhere (HANSSEN 1 of 2). Therefore smoking should be banned in public spaces because it causes harm to the smoker's body, as well as causing unwarranted health and economic problems for the public. People smoke in many places. Buses, hospitals, libraries, restaurants, bars, banks and even

Smoking should be banned from all Public Areas

1287 words - 6 pages Do you smell that? That foul scent mixed into the air. It’s killing you slowly inside, each time you take a breath of this putrid, polluted, dirty scent. You smell it too, the trillions of chemicals racing into your lungs. Now look around yourself, and you’ll see someone smoking on the bench beside you. Smoking is the number one avoidable causes of death. Therefore, smoking should be banned from all public areas. The ban from smoking in public

Should cigarette smoking be banned?

1099 words - 5 pages are those who could care less either way it goes. I believe that cigarette smoking should be banned because it causes serious health issues for those who smoke, it can also cause health issues for those who are just around cigarette smokers, and there are no positive factors of smoking. Tobacco use for smoking began in America in the 17th century, but it wasn’t until 1865 that cigarettes were sold for profit when a man in North Carolina

should smoking be globally banned

1020 words - 5 pages , smoking should be globally banned. (Teens Health, 2007). Everyday people breathe in air, but they don’t know that the air is polluted by cigarettes. Smoking doesn’t only harm the user, but also the people surrounding them. Secondhand smoking is when people around them inhale the toxic chemicals that are being released from the smoker. The general public inhales the toxic chemicals in the air. Secondhand smoking is worse than firsthand smoking

Should Outdoor Smoking be Banned

1807 words - 7 pages pleasures of liberty, to enjoy a nice cigarette? (Kozlowski 21)” The government is preventing smokers from smoking in most indoor places and now it is spreading to outdoor public places (Kozlowski 21). Therefore, to protect the rights and freedoms of smokers, there should be no ban for smoking outdoors (Sureda et. al. 767). A big issue that arises as smoking bans expand to outdoors public places is the harassment of many smokers from nonsmokers (Bell 100

Similar Essays

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places?

755 words - 4 pages assembly passed a bill that would ban smoking at all public parks and benches” this, they hope will build a beneficial for environment for everyone in the the community, even the smokers. Smoking ban creates area of shame for smokers, is an article by Jeffrey Gentry, a journalist and reporter for The News Journal. Gentry writes “if you’re a smoker in Rehoboth Beach… smoking also will be banned there Thursday” In Rehoboth Beach the resorts towns ban

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places In Ontario?

1182 words - 5 pages Imagine being at a nice restaurant, waiting to enjoy a great meal. Leaning in to takethat first bite, a puff of reeking cigarette smoke surrounds the food, and it is not verypleasant. A debatable topic that has brought on numerous attention is whether or notsmoking should be banned in public areas in Ontario, such as restaurants. Smoking inpublic areas should be taken into great consideration. There are three significant reasonswhy this is

Smoking Should Be Banned In All Public Places

1315 words - 5 pages Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places Every year thousands of people die because of having cancer or other tobacco related illnesses due to smoking. Smoking is seen everywhere from our own television screens to even the world wide web; the internet. Tobacco is the substance that is in these cigarettes. These tobacco products are promoted through tobacco ads that are found almost everywhere you turn. They

Smoking Should Not Be Banned In Public Places

737 words - 3 pages deny service to these patrons. In modern society, the government knows better than to discriminate against minorities, senior citizens, or the physically handicapped; it does not hesitate, however, to discriminate against smokers. Personal choice is a simple principle that is highly valued in American society. Banning smoking in all public restaurants violates this principle and jeopardizes our freedom. Smoking should not be banned in all