This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Sigmund Freud And Erik Erikson/ Science Vs. Religion Hunter College/ Religion Essay

833 words - 4 pages

Science vs. Religion
Sigmund Freud and Erik Erikson are two psychologists who disagreed on the value of religion for human civilization. Freud argued that religion is a corrosive influence for society because it is rooted in fantasy; whereas Erikson believed that religion provides an important framework and order for life. A 2010 Pew Research study estimated that 5.9 billion people claim affiliation to an organized religious group.  If Freud's theory is correct 84% of the world population engage in wishful thinking. Could it be possible that a majority of society are immature and childish?   
In his book, The Future of Illusion, Freud discusses the destructive nature of human beings and the need to find a way to coerce people to overcome their laziness and impulses.  His perspective on religion is built on his theory of the id, the ego and the superego. He also discusses the primal need for people to find comfort and feel the illusion of control when facing the harsh realities of life. When still a child a person first turns to his mother, then later on, his father, to solve his problems and protect him. This emotional craving for reassurance and comfort persists with a person throughout his life; and in the absence of a father, people turn to religion. Religion and its associated moral precepts can also serve as a motivation for the work and impulse control that is needed for the functioning and continued preservation of society. Religious ideas inform people on the most important issues in life. However, Freud opines that religion is merely an illusion rooted in wishful thinking. Moreover, whereas statements made in other aspects of life can be questioned and even proven, religion is often accompanied with dogmatism. Questioning the tenets of religion is often met with negative consequences. Instead, belief in religious principles rests on inherited tradition and assumptions of proof that are also passed down from previous generations.
Freud believed that human society progressed through science, not religion; and that science and religion were mortal enemies. Due to the advancements in science such as technology and medicine, religion will become less and less relevant. Instead of turning to an imaginary g-d for help with an illness or preparation for a natural disaster, practical solutions will be found in scientific discoveries. It is for this reason Freud asserts that religion can be a destructive force as it can convince someone to be lazy and avoid pursuing real solutions to his problems and taking the necessary steps to improve his life and the world he lives in.
Erik Erikson critiques Freud's beliefs of...

Find Another Essay On Sigmund Freud and Erik Erikson/ Science vs. Religion - Hunter college/ religion - essay

Science vs. Religion Essay

2052 words - 8 pages Science vs. Religion Since the dawn of man, humans have striven to explain the many mysteries of the universe, and to justify our existence in it. Throughout this journey of self-understanding, numerous standpoints on human existence have evolved and merged into a complex, abstract manifestation called religion. However, as the human race has grown and advanced itself, many ideas expressed by religion seem less and less plausible

Religion vs. Science Essay

1007 words - 4 pages Religion vs. Science The human mind is easily convinced on what the eyes tell the mind. If you see something in front of yourself, you might have an easier time believing, than if one was to tell a story. Religion is a story that has been told for thousands of years, and not till technology has ripened have scientists disproved many beliefs. It is now that mankind lets religion restrain the mind from portraying the truth about life

Knowledge: Science vs Religion

1607 words - 6 pages There has already been some knowledge that people once believed in, but then someone discovered new information that contradicted the previous knowledge everyone thought was true. In this essay I will consider some knowledge issues considering the view of two different areas of knowledge, which I chose natural science and religion. The purpose of this essay is to distinguish between different accepted knowledge, and to investigate why some

science vs. religion

2301 words - 10 pages One of the great public battlegrounds in modern time is science vs. religion. Is this the great unwinnable war, or is there a common ground? I suggest that the issue is not either side is absolutely right or wrong; the issue in our public discourse, in our public theology, is the misinformation both sides present and the failure to understand the complexity of information. As Donald Rumsfeld might say, it is "the unknown known" - a failure to

religion vs science for galileo - hist1112 - essay

551 words - 3 pages Lee 1 Lee 4 Jungmin Lee Mr. Granado HIST1112 02/01/2018 Question 1 Galileo Galilei, most of the time, is described as a committed promoter and defender of science opposed to uninformed and authoritarian churchmen, being appreciated with his scientific achievements in astronomy, mathematics and physics. In fact, Galileo was a devout Christian who hoped for a healthy relationship between religion and science: “We conclude that God is known first

Religion and Faith vs. Reason and Science

1039 words - 4 pages The general assumption with people is that science and religion, or faith and reason, are stuck in an infinite war against each other. Someone must choose to be a person of thought, reason, and science, or choose to embrace religion, scripture, and faith alone. If this is true, then someone who is with the Roman Catholic Church rejects science with all of its theories, and if one embraces science, then one rejects the Church and all of her

Freud & Erikson understanding human development & personality. - houston community college - essay

1959 words - 8 pages 1 Fred vs Erikson Rajani Fred Vs Erikson Developmental psychology is an area of research dedicated to the understanding of child-development. Throughout history many theories have been used to attempt to explain the complex process. Two of those theorists, Freud and Erikson, were instrumental in creating a foundation for

Science and Religion

1272 words - 5 pages vs. evolution is one of the only foundations between the relationship of religion and science. Contrarily, science and religion are not at a constant battle. They exist as two different, usually conflicting, beliefs of solving the same problem (A Brief Overview; Examples; Causes). Pumfrey explains this:"Although histories of science and religion produced in recent decadeshave tended to argue that complexification and contextualization

Science and Religion

1644 words - 7 pages Science and religion have always collided. Science is based on observation and what we can prove. Religion on the other hand makes arguments analytical in nature and requires faith. The basis though may not seem similar. A scientist might call this as the order in the universe or the Energy, which is transmitted in the world we live in. Religions like to look this ultimate reality as God. This entity is capable of setting an order in the

Religion and Science

1076 words - 5 pages about God and creation in Christian context.” There have been other instances in which science and religion have disagreed like speculative science, the killing of embryos and nuclear weapons. Currently the Catholic Church does not have any issue with the theory of the big bang or evolution but rather focuses on such actions that could be categorized as immoral. In other words, religion works as a moral indicator for science which tries to warn us

Science and Religion

849 words - 3 pages created a gap between science and religion. While Christians are dedicated in their belief of God, Fynman states that scientists are "atheist at heart". The only way to try fill this gap, which will ultimately help both the scientific view and the religious view coincide together, is to first examine evolution and second try to find a medium between the two view points. Even though, science may prove many natural happenings, I believe everything

Similar Essays

Science Vs Religion Essay

1567 words - 6 pages Title of Assignment Is science just another form of religion, with people like physicist Stephen Hawking among its high priests? Are science and religions simply both similar social constructions? In your response to this question, specifically consider how irrational social factors influence everything, including science and religion. Introduction One of today's most disputable and warmed issues is whether the clash between science and

Science Vs. Religion Essay

1417 words - 6 pages Religion versus science, the debates and conflicts have been on for centuries. For both religious and scientific ideals, the faith people have drives them. In this paper, I will examine the story of “The Eye of Apollo” by G.K. Chesterton, and the episode “House vs. God” of House, M.D., in order to question this conflict. The main character—Father Brown—in “The Eye of Apollo” combines his reasoning with his religious ideals and beliefs, or we can

Science Vs Religion Essay

2196 words - 9 pages Science and Religion (By darongma@yahoo.com)Science and Religion have been long time enemies to each other as they may seem to the world. For centuries, they have remained noble but arrogant, both stood firm on their own grounds, neither wanted to give way. For many scientists, they are afraid that tortures the church once imposed on Galileo for speaking of scientific truth would again repeat; they fear that not only religion slows down

Religion Vs. Science Essay

1689 words - 7 pages Religion vs. Science This paper will examine the scientific view verse religion. I feel their support for the big picture is shallow and untenable. I believe in science but I also have faith. Scientific research has lead to dramatic and more humane treatments of persons suffering from mental disease, depression, and physical injury. The reputation of scientists has reached an all-time high. Majority of Americans have said