Sir Laurence Olivier's Richard Iii Versus Ian Mc Kellan's Richard Iii

1296 words - 5 pages

Sir Laurence Olivier's Richard III versus Ian McKellan's Richard III

INTRODUCTION

It seems that modern Hollywood filmmakers are as much in love with Shakespeare's plays as were the 16th century audiences who first enjoyed them. Recent updates of Hamlet (1996) and Romeo and Juliet (1996), both highly successful movies, bear this out, as well as the two best film versions of Richard III; Sir Laurence Olivier's 1954 "period piece", and Ian McKellan's more modern interpretation (1995).

In McKellan's Richard III, we see Britain in the late 1930s, at the end of a savage civil war between the House of York and the House of Lancaster. This version works for a number of reasons: 1) it is made for a modern audience; 2) the social and historical events are part of the audience's collective memory; and 3) the film's conclusion has a stronger dramatic impact.

1. Presentation of the play

"Image is everything", says the commercial, and with movies being almost entirely dependent on the visual element, the phrase rings truer than ever. Olivier's version, along with being a "period piece", is done very much in the classic style; the stage is static, almost as if it were a play and not a movie. The sets are colorful and spacious, but they also have a simplistic feel, as though most of the budget went into the costumes (again, very much in the classic style). The movie brings us almost immediately to the throne room of King Edward IV, recently victorious in England's brutal civil war between the House of York and the House of Lancaster; the "Wars of the Roses". After all but Richard have exited, we hear Richard's opening soliloquy in its' entirety. The setting is very much what we call a "period piece"; the costumes, sets, etc. are all of Richard's time and place.

With McKellan's version, one immediately grasps that money was no object to making this movie. It is done in the modern style, with lots of action and movement, primarily using existing buildings as sets, instead of rebuilding them on soundstages. Every scene is alive with movement and detail, a quality that is sadly lacking in Olivier's version. The setting is Britain, but a Britain very much of the late 1930s. This much can be seen at once. Richard's opening soliloquy is broken in half; the first half is spoken into a microphone before a crowd of merry-makers at King Edward IV's victory celebration. However, just as Richard reaches "Grim-visag'd war has smoothed his wrinkled brow", and the soliloquy becomes more a description of Richard's plans, we cut away to Richard, alone, in the men's room--taking a piss. As Richard relieves himself, he continues his soliloquy. Clearly, the movie is not above using anything--including Richard's bathroom habits--to move the story along. A perfect fit for today's audiences.

2. Background

When Olivier made Richard III, he had to work within the bounds of the 1950s, which makes it difficult for modern audiences (myself...

Find Another Essay On Sir Laurence Olivier's Richard III versus Ian McKellan's Richard III

Characteristics of Richard III Essay

1063 words - 4 pages Richard was the son of Richard Plantagenet, 3rd Duke of York and Cecily Neville. He was born on 2 October 1452 at Fotheringay Castle. He married Anne Neville. He has two brothers, George Plantagenet, 1st Duke of Clarence and King Edward IV. He was also known as Gloucester, duke of Gloucester and later becomes King Richard III. He succeeded to the throne of England on June 1483. King Richard III was famous because of he is the main suspect in the

Richard III a tragedy Essay

1760 words - 7 pages Richard III, a tragedy or not a tragedy?As it has been proved throughout the centuries, when it comes to classifying William Shakespeare's plays it is hard to notice a clear-cut division regarding the literary genres. As a matter of fact, the play Richard III is no exception to that rule. Indeed, although it has been discussed by literary critics whether this play should be included within the Histories or the Tragedies, Richard III has been

Richard III: Monster or Myth?

1777 words - 8 pages portrait of Richard III was real or a mere metaphor to describe his actions. It is just conceivably that this physical representation is based on the Tudor Myth -a myth that initially started by Tudor’s historians such as Polydore Vergir and Sir Thomas More, and perpetuated by Shakespreare’s play Richard III, in which he is also described as an abnormal King. By the end of the Hundred Years’ War, England was embroiled in civil wars, which became known

Richard III by William Shakespeare

1197 words - 5 pages Richard III.” Shakespeare’s Histories (Bloom’s Major Dramatists). Ed. Harold Bloom, Broomall, PA: Chelsea House, 2000. 24-28. Miner, Madonne M. “‘Neither Mother, Wife, nor England’s Queen’: The Roles of Women in Richard III.” William Shakespeare’s Richard III (Modern Critical Interpretations). Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1988. 45-60. Moulton, Ian Frederick. “‘A Great Monster Deformed’: The Unruly Masculinity of Richard III

Richard III: A Ruthless King

1408 words - 6 pages Richard III is known to this day as a ruthless king, remaining infamous for his alleged murders and nefarious acts. There are many rumors surrounding his rule, telling stories of his horrid temperament and appearance, and how he unscrupulously killed anyone who might oppose his reign. But modern historians are taking another look at his history, and some say he was not as bad as the stories claimed. Despite Richard III’s notoriety and bloody

Stylistic Techniques in "Richard III"

853 words - 3 pages Throughout the Play Richard III, author William Shakespeare incorporates great uses of stylistic features to aid the overall quality of the story and to help achieve success within the very complicated plot. In an attempt to intensify Richard's plot to gain the throne of England, he uses three specific minor plays, to create an overall production for the audience. The first play which we see involves Richard connecting directly with the

Richard III by William Shakespeare

1907 words - 8 pages Written during a time of peace immediately following the conclusion of the War of the Roses between the Yorks and the Lancasters, William Shakespeare’s play Richard III showcases a multi-faceted master of linguistic eloquence, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, a character who simultaneously manages to be droll, revolting, deadly, yet fascinating. Richard's villainy works in a keen, detestable manner, manifesting itself in his specific use or, rather

Portrayal of "Richard III" by Lawrence Olivier.

2085 words - 8 pages William Shakespeare wrote "Richard III" in 1592. He amalgamated his text from a variety of historical records and legends. In doing so, he created a dramatically heightened play and gave Richard, his villainous antihero, intense political and social dimensions. Laurence Olivier adapted the play from the medium of the theatre to film in 1955. It is unusual for Shakespeare's plays to be performed in their entirety. He condensed Shakespeare's text

The Director's Notes on Richard III

1480 words - 6 pages both their deaths shalt thou be accessory. The video which I think was most believable about Anne marrying Richard had to be the Laurence Olivia version. This is because it is set back in the real time of Richard lll. The Ian Mckellen version is set in quite a modern age and people find it very hard to believe that a modern woman would fall for Richard’s ways just like that. I think that the Ian Mckellen version was better

The Evil King in Shakespeare's Richard III

2389 words - 10 pages too well the evil nature of Richard. He has killed her husband, and as she and some men carry the corpse through the streets, Richard halts their procession in order to manipulate her into becoming his wife, thus solidifying his claim to the English crown. Ian Frederick Moulton, speaking of gender issues in Richard III, sees this seduction of Lady Anne as "an act of pure Realpolitik, in which he is motivated neither by lust nor affection" (266

The Supernatural in Shakespeare's Richard III

1524 words - 6 pages The Supernatural in Shakespeare's Richard III Casting a darkly mythical aura around Richard III, supernatural elements are intrinsic to this Shakespearean history play. The prophetic dreams of Clarence and Stanley blur the line between dream and reality, serving to foreshadow impending doom. The ghosts that appear before Richard III and Richmond before their battle create an atmosphere of dread and suspense, and they also herald Richard's

Similar Essays

Richard Iii Essay

524 words - 2 pages Richard III is the first text of Shakespeare's that I have ever read. I now feel that I somewhat realize the amazing talent of that one man. Shakespeare dissects the human being and creates a story form the pieces, weaving them together with an amazing way of getting a message across. The message in Richard III is that you must be a whole person; you must be in touch with your emotional/social self and your individual fight for power. A person

Richard Iii Essay

679 words - 3 pages In William Shakespeare's Richard III, we see Shakespeare's interpretation ofdespot rule and the parallels that stem from this interpretation. The character type ofRichard has been examined and marveled for thousands of years. From Plato'sexamination of despot rule in the Republic, we see the motives of what drives despotrulers. A look at the background of Richard and how his upbringing and personal lifecontributed to his insecurities will help

Richard Iii Essay

1408 words - 6 pages Richard III, from Shakespeare's history play "King Richard the Third", is the perfect embodiment of a political monster. He represents evil in the state--he is the incarnation of the inauspicious power and the symbol of a devilish nihilism. The monster also plays the role of a social magnifying glass. It represents the physical exaggeration of moral defects. Richard III is a monster because he is immoral and ridicules honour and virtue so as to

Richard Iii, The Innocent Essay

1186 words - 5 pages The controversy that has surrounded Richard III is one that will not die. Since the reign of Henry VII the question of Richard's guilt or innocence in regards to his nephews' murder has plagued historians. The story of a sinister and murderous Richard originated from Henry VII's time of rule. The myth explained Richard murdered the two sons of his brother Edward IV and usurped the crown following Edward's death. However, this account has been