Case Brief Essay

1190 words - 5 pages

Tennessee v. Reeves. 917 S.W.2d 825 (Supreme Court of Tennessee, 1996)
On the evening of January 5, 1993, Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman, both twelve years of age and students at West Carroll Middle School, spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher, Janice Geiger. They agreed that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days so that it could be placed in Geiger's drink. After that , they would steal Geiger's car and drive to the Smoky Mountains. On the morning of January 6, Coffman placed a packet of rat poison in her purse and board the school bus. Coffman told another student, Christy Hernandez, of the plan and show her the poison. Hernandez went and informed her homeroom teacher, Sherry Cockrill. Cockrill then informed the school principal, Claudia Argo. When Geiger entered her classroom that morning, she observed Reeves and Coffman leaning over her deck; and when the girls noticed her, they giggled and ran back to their seats. Geiger saw a purse lying next to her coffee cup on the top of the desk. Shortly after Argo called Coffman to the principal's office, rat poison was found in Coffman's purse. Both Reeves and Coffman gave written statement to the Sheriff investigator concerning their plan to poison Geiger and steal her car.
Reeves and Coffman were found to be delinquent by the Carroll County Juvenile Court, and both appealed from that ruling to the Carroll County Circuit Court. After a jury found that the girls attempted to commit second degree murder in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. Section(s) 19-12-101, the "criminal attempt" statute, the trial court affirmed the juvenile court order and sentenced the girl to the Department of Youth development for an indefinite period.
The issue in this case is to determine whether the defendant's action in this case constitute a "substantial step" toward the commission of second degree murder under the new statue. The "substantial step" issue has not yet been addressed by a Tennessee court in a published opinion, and question is made more difficult by the fact that the legislature declined to set forth any definition of the term, preferring instead to "leave the issue of what constitutes a substantial step [to the court] for determination in each particular case".
Yes. The Court of Appeals is affirmed the decision of the lower court and upheld the conviction of the defendant.
The court had reason that even though the defendant did not place the poison in the cup, but simply brought it to the crime scene, we also are well aware that the attempt law has been consistently and effectively criticized. One persistent criticism of the endeavor to separate "mere preparation" from the "act itself" is merely one of the termini on a continuum of criminal activity.

State v. Kobel. 927 S.W.2d 445 (Missouri Appellate Court, Western District, 1996)
Two vehicles, including Mr. Kobel's, were moving together along Main Street near Eighteenth Street in...

Find Another Essay On Case Brief

Case Brief of Illinois v. Caballes

1041 words - 5 pages Case Brief of Illinois v. Caballes Citation: 543 U.S. 405 (2005) Case Facts: Roy Caballes was stopped for speeding by an Illinois state trooper Daniel Gillette. During the traffic stop another state trooper Craig Graham of the Illinois State Police Drug Interdiction Team, overheard the stop on the radio and showed up to the scene with a narcotics detection dog. While the first trooper was writing Roy Caballes a warning ticket for speeding the

Case Brief Essay

913 words - 4 pages Case Citation The case I chose to do was Patrick Joseph Potter, Appellant, v. Green Meadows, Par 3, Appellee. The case was found in the Southern Reporter, volume 510 starting on page 1225. The District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District heard the case and made its decision on August 13, 1987; 510 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. App. 1 Dist. 1987). Summary of Facts The original case in question consisted of golfer being injured and filing charges of

TV Guide - A brief analysis from the HBR case

943 words - 4 pages Options for the futureIn the paper TV Guide (A), several options are presented for future development. This document will select the best of these and provide support for this selection from the evidence contained within the paper. A brief discussion of the other options will be given.Joseph Barletta, CEO of TV guide has to steer the business towards a changing future whilst protecting the cash flows of TV Guide.By 1994, the company was already

Hollowell v. Orleans Regional Hospital Case brief - Business Law II - Case Study Assignment

469 words - 2 pages Adam Murphy Bus Law II Prof. David September 12th, 2016 CASE BRIEF #2 Case: Hollowell v. Orleans Regional Hospital, 217 F3d 379 (5th Cir. 2000) Facts: Orleans Regional Hospital, a Medicaid funded psychiatric hospital primarily served adolescents and children. The hospital was a limited liability company established with three members; NORS LLC, North Louisiana, Inc. and Precision, Inc. Defendants John C. Turner and William C. Windham held fifty

Law Case Brief

1163 words - 5 pages Last Name 5Student's NameSchoolBusiness Law IIFebruary 14, 2014Instructor's NameCIVIL LAW CASECase Title: The Bar Plan v. William Cooper, et al.Case Number: 290 S.W.3d 788 (2009)This case was located from the Lexis Nexis website.The case originated from the District Trial Court, to Missouri Court of Appeals and then the State Supreme Court.ISSUE: The issue in this case is whether or not the attorney Devereux of The Bar Plan (TBP) had been

Capstone Case Brief

983 words - 4 pages appellate court reversed Millers’ conviction and remanded the case for a new trial.RationaleMiller’s defense was that he was sane before and after killing Goring but was insane during the killing. Three medical experts testified that his mental condition caused him to have violent seizures while completely sane. Additional testimony showed that Miller acted extremely violent without the ability to appreciate the nature of his actions, and

A Brief Narrative of the Case and Trial of John Peter Zenger by Hamilton

1028 words - 4 pages not guilty. Later, "A Brief Narrative of the Case and Trial of John Peter Zenger," written by Hamilton, was published anonymously in Zenger's paper. The Brief Narrative argued that newspapers should be free to criticize the government as long as what they wrote was true. The article helped shape the political culture that led to the Revolutionary War and the subsequent adoption of the Bill of Rights. A significant Amendment was added to the

arzu v. arzu case brief

541 words - 2 pages Richard Arzu v. Frank Arzu and Estanisalo Arzu 597 N.Y.S. 2d 322 Brief PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Richard Arzu brought action against his father, Frank Arzu, and step-mother, Estanisalo Arzu, alleging misrepresentation and fraud in connection with a medical malpractice action settlement monies which Frank entrusted to his father; and seeking compensatory damages and related relief. The Supreme Court, Bronx County, Silver J. , vacated ex parte order

Marbury V. Madison Case Brief

500 words - 2 pages those categories.Significance: This case is significant because it is the first example of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review to deem a provision of federal law as being invalid. This decision set into place the doctrine of judicial review. This gives the Supreme Court the authority to declare statutes unconstitutional. Thus, legislature can not pass laws contradictory to the constitution. Because it is the Supreme Court's role to

Legal brief essay-3 strikes case

1078 words - 4 pages the law. The two men appeal to the US Supreme Court for superior decisions. Close research of the case shows that the Three Strikes law does not violate the 8th amendment.The law is intended to stop repeat offenders and habitual criminals from committing crimes and keep them away from the rest of society. Its purpose is legitimate, and has been approved by California voters, and the judges should respect voter’s choice. And if criminals are

Case Brief: Green Tree Financial Corp

1403 words - 6 pages U.S. Dist. Ct. 991 F. Supp. 1410 Plaintiff: Larketta RANDOLPH Defendant: GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORP. Facts of the Case: Larketta Randolph financed a mobile home through Green Tree Financial. Her home retail installment contract and security agreement required that Randolph buy vendor’s single interest insurance, which protects the vendor from the costs of repossession if any default were to occur. The agreement also provided that if any

Similar Essays

Case Brief Essay

799 words - 4 pages Case Brief Case Citation: SOLORIO v. UNITED STATES 483 U.S. 435 (1987) (No. 85-1581) Procedural History: The petitioner, who was serving as an active member in the United States Coast Guard, was facing a general court martial in New York for sexually abusing the underaged daughters of fellow Coast Guard members while serving at his previous duty station in Alaska and at his current duty station in New York. Solorio filed a motion to dismiss

Medina V California Case Brief Essay

645 words - 3 pages defense all the time, but isn't successful most of the time. Medina should have pleaded guilty and saved some time a trouble.ReferencesLaw School Case Briefs | Hints | Tactics. (n.d.). : Medina v. California case brief. Retrieved January 19, 2014, from http://www.lawschoolcasebriefs.net/2013/11/medina-v-california-case-brief.htmlMediana v. California 112 S. Ct. 2572 (1992). (n.d.). Mediana v. California 112 S. Ct. 2572 (1992). Retrieved January

Case Brief On 5th Amendment Essay

580 words - 2 pages Case brief on 5th amendmentFACTS:A federal grand jury in South Dakota is investigating possible criminal violations of the Clean Water Act, at a corporation's wastewater treatment facility. Two former employees have pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to violate the Clean Water Act, and the grand jury investigation includes whether senior corporate officers may be criminally liable as "responsible corporate officer".ISSUE:Does the individual have a

Case Brief For An Ontario Criminal Court Case Law Case Brief

865 words - 4 pages Case Brief Assignment – Ontario Court of Justice Scarborough - Toronto Law 201 Alexander Aston #20025631 January 23rd 2018 Facts: · Basil Brown was convicted after trial for assault with a weapon, assault causing bodily harm, and possession of a weapon for a purpose dangerous to the public peace. · Ms. Battersby (for the Crown) seeks a sentence in the range of 15-18 months less credit for presentence custody. · Ms. Sherwood (for the defendant