This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Skepticism Is True Essay

950 words - 4 pages

The Truth of Skepticism

Skepticism, in the context of this paper, is defined as the proposition that there is an inherent inability to absolutely and perfectly have knowledge of the truth of a particular object, hence there is no proof a truth exists for any object. An argument that skepticism is true sets out to establish the subjectivity and imperfection in the gathering and analysis of empirical data about an object. What skepticism is not is the denial that absolute truths exist about any object. Rather, skepticism is the denial of the assertion that it can be proven that absolute truths exist about any object . Hence, the goal of defending skepticism is to illustrate the quantitative and qualitative accuracy limitations inherent in empirical observations as well as the perceptive distortions in such observations. More succinctly we'll be showing that:

(1) We learn of an object through empirical observations.
(2) Empirical observations are inherently inaccurate and subjective.
(3) We can never learn an object with perfect and objective accuracy and, hence, truly know the truth of an object.

For definition, let quantitative analysis be the measurement of an object: its height, its mass, its volume, etc. Quantitative analysis is a tool for gaining empirical evidence about an object to gain knowledge of it; that is, to know a truth about that object. However, quantitative measurements are done with a degree of precision. Precision is the degree of closeness to a true value. Precision, and the limitations of precision, are so ingrained in scientific research that values are measured by 'significant digits'. For lack of tools capable of perfect measurement, researchers decide how much inaccuracy, or lack of the 'true' quantity, will be acceptable for their purposes.

For example, let us evaluate pi – an irrational number. By definition, an irrational number is one that cannot be expressed as a ratio. While its utility is not being called into question, its introduction in an equation necessarily makes any quantitative analysis utilizing it inexact. Hence, one cannot know the absolute truth of the circumference of an object and, therefor, the exact truth of the object being measured. Furthermore, absolute shapes of objects defy existence. Matter, at a molecular level, is not smooth. Electron orbits and the angle of bonding in molecules make necessarily non-smooth shapes. What might appear as a perfect ball or square to human observation, or high precision tools, is not. Therefore, even removing irrational numbers from measurements will not afford the exact 'true' measurement of an object. Likewise, there are inherent flaws in qualitative analysis.

Let us define qualitative analysis, for purposes of this paper, as the empirical observations of an object pertaining to its distinctive attributes and characteristics. Such attributes could include color, texture, abrasiveness, reflectiveness, etc. For example, a tennis ball would be green,...

Find Another Essay On Skepticism is true

The Infinite Regress Argument Essay

1295 words - 6 pages Epistemological skepticism is the idea that individuals lack knowledge or justification for a specific group of propositions (Barnett, 2014). Skepticism with respect to all propositions is known as global skepticism, and it reveals that knowledge is nonexistent (2014). The regress problem is a difficulty in epistemology, where an idea has to be justified, because the justification itself has to have further reasoning (2014). The infinite

Descartes's Views on Skepticism Essay

805 words - 4 pages To be a skeptic means that one disbelieves what others consider truth. For example, skepticism could apply to an atheist. Atheism is the non-belief in God, therefore and atheist would be a skeptic. Skepticism is a healthy attitude as one should question the ideas they are given, but they should not take it so far that they do not believe in anything. Descartes, says, “Several years have now passed since I first realized how numerous were the

Philosophy of the Matrix

1399 words - 6 pages life (Brickhouse). There are times when things seem too good to be true, and one will hear another say, “Pinch me and see if I’m awake.” This is skepticism, where one is always expecting “a catch” or some sort of obstacle or difficulty that may be attached to a good thing. In the movie, Morpheus asks the question, “What is real?” Reality, when looked at logically, is not always what is tangible, but is where things are not seen or otherwise


1170 words - 5 pages Skepticism Skepticism is the Western philosophical tradition that maintains that human beings can never arrive at any kind of certain knowledge. Originating in Greece in the middle of the fourth century BC, skepticism and its derivatives are based on the following principles: There is no such thing as certainty in human knowledge. All human knowledge is only probably true, that is, true most of the time, or not true. Several non


2533 words - 10 pages that knowledge is certain and can be attained. He claimed that even the skeptics know his own position to be true. He maintains this position in a certain logical proposition. Against the skeptics, Augustine argues that skepticism is self-refuting. Thus, "the skeptics claim we cannot know anything to be true. To deny that we can know the truth requires a definition of truth. This definition is either true or false. If this definition is false, then

Skepticism in the Modern World

860 words - 4 pages Philosophical skepticism, according to Scottish philosopher David Hume, is asking whether human beings can perceive the world around us with any degree of accuracy. Practicing this school of thought means that a person initially never believes anything to be true, but at the same time, does not say everything is necessarily false; instead, he maintains a position of doubt. The final source of truth for a skeptic is experience. In terms

James is the Best

853 words - 4 pages Henry of Ghent attempts to persuade us that skepticism is impossible and that we can have knowledge. He states that some propositions are shown to always be true due to how humans act and as thus they defeat skepticism. The Skeptics disagree with Henry’s argument since they believe that we have no way of verifying truth. Thus the Skeptics state that we can act through beliefs alone. Henry’s argument is ultimately defeated on this point since


1519 words - 7 pages The first question that needs to be is asked to complete this analysis is: How are knowledge claims created? A knowledge claim is a judgment of something we believe to be true with or without sufficient evidence. Knowledge claims are what we create as a means to justify and/or rationalize our beliefs and thoughts. Knowledge claims are created in an attempt to define and categorize those thoughts. One way knowledge claims are created is through


1473 words - 6 pages of Contextualism by first explaining the skeptical paradox. The skeptical paradox here is the paradox that Cohen sees between Skepticism and Contextualism Cohen argues that he does see conflict in the paradox, as all the terms can be true dependent on the context in which it is used. The skeptical paradox is as follows: - (1) I know that P, (2) I don’t know that Not-H, (3) I know that P only if I know that Not-H. To start with, Cohen sees two

Nietzsche’s Perspectivism and Philosophical Skepticism: A Comparison

4430 words - 18 pages makes skepticism a distance idea in this thought. Perspectivism is an idea that he created to explain how he can be certain about ideas and still encourage other ideas. The importance of perspectivism to Nietzsche’s thought is the agon he can conclude that his ideas are true to him, so there is a truth, and that others have opinions in order to make life have meaning. Perspectivism to truth in Nietzsche’s thought is a step further through the

'the Excellent Foppery of the World': Skepticism in King Lear

2424 words - 10 pages `The Excellent Foppery of the World': Skepticism in King Lear "As flies to wanton boys are we to th' gods; / They kill us for their sport." (4.1.41-42) So bemoans the blinded and despondent Earl of Gloucester in King Lear. Whether his claim deserves merit, while intriguing, is far beyond the scope of this paper. What I do intend to explore, however, is whether Shakespeare's play supports or opposes these and other skeptical ideas. I

Similar Essays

Arguments Against Philosophical Skepticism Essay

2420 words - 10 pages arguments for skepticism and its various forms seem valid and theoretically proven to be justified, my stance is against skepticism. I believe that skepticism may exist in various forms; however, I believe that the true nature of skepticism’s in Hume’s theory is not entirely justifiable and I personally do not believe in that form of skepticism. I argue that while skepticism has seemingly proven reasoning’s the proof of the external world and its

Skepticism Refuted Essay

982 words - 4 pages is apparent that an argument posed by a formidable skeptic can indeed be refuted by simple means of reasoning and rationalization, as long as the skeptic remains a part of a legitimate argument and is able to present a legitimate conclusion to the issue being discussed. Although a true skeptic would most likely never admit to the fact that skepticism is fatally flawed, the fact of the matter is that there are other ways to ascertain a more

Analyzing The Philosophies Of Roderick Chisholm

964 words - 4 pages breaches in his reasoning. With a healthy common sense, Chisholm states that one will find issues with both extremes of skepticism, where we have an incredibly vast amount of knowledge or no insight at all. He rejects skeptics who like to say that people have no knowledge to what the world really is like and states that, “People tend to become skeptics, temporarily, after reading books on popular science...” (Chisholm, 77) which truly shows his

Descartes And Hume: A Look At Skepticism And Finding Stability

905 words - 4 pages ). Therefore, in spite of everything he is skeptical of, Descartes manages to believe that his true existence is not something worthy of doubt. David Hume’s approach to skepticism is very different from Descartes’ ideas, mainly because he believes that it is not good to become skeptical of everything. Hume feels that there are two different types of skepticism: the type the Descartes follows, known as the “antecedent” skepticism that involves