Slavery: Affecting Every Party Involved Essay

2260 words - 9 pages

Slavery, vile, heinous and wicked was the norm for many southerners. The Fires of Jubilee: Nat Turner’s Fierce Rebellion written by Stephen B. Oates helps further this argument with gruesome details of the barbaric and brutal practice of slavery. It describes the long working hours, the lost of dignity and the degradation from human beings to nearly animals. Slaves were forced to toil the scorching fields for countless of hours without a chance of improving their occupation, social status or how they lived their lives. Fredrick Douglas stated “At this moment, I saw more clearly than ever the brutalities effect of slavery upon both the slave and the slave owner.” From a distance slave holder did not seem to come away from slavery with any harm. This is far from the truth. This is far from the truth. Slavery caused slave owners to degrade into brutes after being brutalized by the evil of slavery. The validity of Fredrick Douglas’s statement is unquestionably accurate. Slavery caused both slave and slave holder to suffer .
The most visible form of suffering slaves had to go through was the brutal physical burden. The great amount of intense and exhausting work led to many slaves becoming sick “in consequence of being over-worked” (From Slavery 356). Many slaves were force to work to such an extreme that their bodies could not handle the intentness and amount of time they were required to work. One of the more tedious tasks slaves were forced to do was picking cotton. “They picked until their shoulders and fingers ached to the bone” (Oates 22). Slaves also had to endure brutal and typically unwarranted physical abuse. James L. Bradley describes a time “when I was a boy, about nine years old, he struck me so hard that I fell down and lost my senses. I remained thus some time, and when I came to myself, he told me he thought he had killed me” (From Slavery 356). There was no such thing as too much in the eyes of owners and overseer when it came to abusing slaves.
Even though the physical toll and work was brutalized to a slave “they are as few gains of sand on the sea-shore, or a few drops of water in the great ocean, compared with the stupendous wrongs which it inflicts upon the mental, moral and religious nature of its hapless victims. It is when we contemplate the slave as a moral and intellectual being can we adequately comprehend the unparalleled enormity of slavery and the intense criminality of the slaveholder” (Former Slave 353). One of the most brutal aspects of slavery was the way many Africans were introduced to a life of servitude. As young children slaves were allowed to play with and develop friendships with white children. During this time these children were innocent and were oblivious to the great degree of change their young lives were going to experience. When the time came slave and white children were divided “into free and chattels into the blessed and wretched of their Christian world” (7 Oates). At a young age, while still...

Find Another Essay On Slavery: Affecting Every Party Involved

Sovereignty and Stephen A. Douglas Essay

1682 words - 7 pages , slavery is fine where it is now; it is not affecting the life of individuals in the North. The issue should just be left alone in states it is already established. Especially, since neither side knows which will gain the support of Great Britain. This is a major gamble, because whichever side does not gain support will more than likely not survive as a lone Nation. This fact is exactly why we need to keep the problem of slavery in the state level

History 7 Essay

883 words - 4 pages along with people opposed to slavery, which party has the right to decide what type of territory and future state it will be declared as? As for the rights of slaves, Lincoln agreed with Douglas that slaves did not have the same individual rights as everyone else, but he did believe that the liberties given under the Declaration of Independence involved such slaves. It is obvious that the Republicans of this time find slavery as being a "moral

Slavery to Civil War

630 words - 3 pages North and the South! Slavery was a primary issue that upsetted many Americans because of Lincoln’s election, Missouri Compromise, and new territories which led to the Civil War. The Missouri Compromise was one of the events that caused slavery to be a main impact on the Civil War. It was an agreement that passed in 1820 between the proslavery and antislavery citizens. The Missouri Compromise involved the regulation of primarily the Western

third parties

1463 words - 6 pages parties have been formed to address single issues. In the United States these issues have included things such as slavery, prohibition, agricultural concerns, and other social issues. The Republican Party was originally a single issue third party. The issue the Republican Party was formed around was the expansion of slavery into newly created states and territories. The Free Soil Party is a strong example of a single-issue party formed with the goal

Historical Contridictions in slavery

1766 words - 8 pages actions as “perfectly [combining] the needs of business, the political ambition of the new Republican party, and the rhetoric of humanitarianism” to stop slavery (Zinn 170). Hence, Howard Zinn complements Lincoln, because of Lincoln’s accomplishments in using slavery as a scapegoat for fighting the south for more Federalist power. Since Abraham Lincoln’s goal, intended to abolish slavery, as a means to control the southern states, how was this

Slaves in the South

1963 words - 8 pages directly involved with slavery probably “did not exceed 2,000,000. If so, not one-third of the population of the South and border States had any direct interest in slavery as a form of property.” Olsen uses two more studies to show that these numbers, or very slight variations, are widely accepted and concedes that they are probably correct, but he disagrees with the treatment these statistics have been given. In what could easily be his thesis

Abolition of Slavery in the United States

1270 words - 6 pages emancipation of all slaves in the United States. When writing about the subject of abolition Garrison did “not wish to think, or speak, or write, with moderation (Engerman p.436).” For Garrison, the abolition of slavery was not political. He believed that politics involved compromise and the matter of slavery was an absolute moral view that slavery should be ended. He believed religious people were hypocrites for being complacent on slavery and not being

Jacksonian Democrats vs. The Whigs

1652 words - 7 pages . All-in-all, the Jeffersonian Democrats supported expansion and the Manifest Destiny to expand slavery in the United States, while the Whig party did not. The issue of Slavery came to the forefront of American political policies following the rapid expansion supported by the Jacksonian Democratic Party. The Jacksonian Democrats supported slave expansion in the Mexican cession because most of the land was below the Missouri Compromise, and they

The Republican Party

572 words - 3 pages the Southern States, but by the late 1850’s, The Republicans had become the majority in almost every Northern State. The Republican Party became something to talk about when thousands of abolitionists came together at a convention in Jackson, Michigan. In 1856, the first Republican National Convention took place. When the Republicans elected Abraham Lincoln in 1860, the fight against slavery became a winnable one. After the victory of the Civil

differences between states

965 words - 4 pages attention of the South's political leaders, many of whom were slave owners themselves. Political leaders in the North were much more divided about the slavery issue. As some had little interest in the subject or others were directly involved with the abolition of the institution of slavery as a whole The debate became very bitter. Some Southern states wanted to secede, or break away from the United States of America and govern themselves (Goldfield

abraham lincons life

866 words - 4 pages of the opponents of slavery and later he was voted in the House of Representatives against the decisions that favored slavery. But he was not a radical abolitionist, he was liberal and approved every state his own slaves policy, knowing that the countries of the South would have no slavery not be viable. He tried to prevent the spread of slavery. But not only with speeches against the slavery he made a name for himself, also with his blatant

Similar Essays

Open Adoption Benefits Every Party Involved

1435 words - 6 pages adoption are older and have some type of health issue that caused them to be out up for adoption. The wait for a healthy, white infant is extremely lengthy and adoptive parents should be prepared to wait. While the wait can be excruciatingly long, the outcome will definitely be worth it in the end. While adoption is a very controversial topic, it has many benefits for every party involved. Contrary to popular belief, not every birth family is

The Role Kansas And Nebraska Played In The Civil War

1662 words - 7 pages voted for it and every single Northern Whig had voted to abolish it (“U.S History”). With the emotional issue of slavery involved, there was no way a common ground could be formed. The Southern Whigs eventually became the Democratic Party and the Northern Whigs reorganized themselves into a group with non-slavery interests, the Republican Party (“U.S History). The new split did nothing but further multiply the tension between the North and South

Pre Civil War Slavery: Early To Mid 1800s

2448 words - 10 pages INTRODUCTION In an idealistic democratic America, one likes to think that everyone is free and everyone is equal. However, this is not the complete truth; we still battle injustice and work to treat everyone fairly every single day. But what is the truth is that we have come a long way and that we have improved over time. Slavery before the Civil War is important in U.S. history because not only was it involved in various significant events

The Republican Party Essay

597 words - 2 pages the two was slavery and its implications for control of the nation.The best illustration of the party's anti-slavery sentiment (as contrasted to abolitionism) in 1860, is the fact that although the party was against slavery , it refused to attempt to stamp it out of the regions it was already present. For example, in the Republican Party Platform for 1860, the party states its abhorrence for slavery and declares that slavery should not be