This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Smoking Should Not Be Banned In Public Places

737 words - 3 pages

Smoking Should Not Be Banned in Restaurants

 
     In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy they prefer. Customers would decide-without the government's help-if they want to avoid smoke-filled rooms or enter them. They might even choose to sit in an area sectioned off for smokers or non-smokers, but the ultimate issue is choice (Ruwart 1). When the government starts telling restaurant owners what their customers can and cannot do, the government is overstepping its boundaries.

Our government aims to protect us-to save us from society's evils. However, in an attempt to protect the public from the effects of passive smoking (second hand smoke)-of which, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service in 1994, "the statistical evidence does not . . . support a conclusion that there are substantive health effects . . ." (Krauthammer)-the feds have failed to protect a vital part of the U.S. economic population: business owners. Many people who drink also tend to smoke; banning drinkers from smoking has hurt business in some bars and restaurants. "According to the California Licensed Beverage Association, business has dropped as much as 85 percent . . . since the prohibition took effect" (Bar Owners Vow 1). The decrease in customers and subsequent loss of revenue has far-reaching effects on employers. A study by the American Beverage Institute entitled "Effect of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns, and Night Clubs" asked 300 respondents about the effects of the ban on their businesses. When asked if the ban caused owners to lay off employees or cut working hours, 29.7 percent of respondents answered "yes"; 59 percent gave the same answer when asked if they experienced a loss of tips/gratuities for bar and serving-staff employees (1). The plight of restaurant and bar owners is often ignored, but it is a serious issue for them and for their employees.

While the argument rages over the effects of smoking on public health, the question that remains is this: "How much is society entitled to penalize smokers for their decisions because-in society's view-those decisions are unhealthy?" (Samuelson). Smoking tobacco is not an illegal act, yet the 25 percent of Americans who do smoke are often treated as if they were criminals. They are incessantly nagged, blamed for numerous illnesses and unpleasantries, and made to...

Find Another Essay On Smoking Should NOT Be Banned in Public Places

Nationwide Smoking Ban: Smoking Should be Banned in All Public Places

1104 words - 4 pages The effects of second-hand smoke have been well-known for decades; in fact, the Surgeon General warned the public about its dangers in 1972 (Schick & Glantz, 2005). Do people knowingly have the right to put others’ health at risk? No, they do not. Exposure to cigarette smoke is a public health risk. Therefore, smoking should be banned in all public places, nationwide. There has been no attempt to impose a national smoking ban by the U.S

Smoking in Public Spaces Should be Banned

2100 words - 8 pages people do not realize the effects of second hand smoke. Smoking is a freedom of choice and is legal for people to do. So until smoking is pronounced illegal and legal actions are taken against it, there is nothing anyone can do to stop it, except banning it from certain places. This in turn will help business and maybe even stop people?s habits altogether. Works Cited Coates, Colin. (2002, Dec. 11) Should Smoking in Public be Banned

Smoking Must Be Banned from All Public Places

753 words - 4 pages attack hospitalizations fell an average 15 percent, while stroke hospitalizations fell 16 percent and hospitalizations for respiratory disease fell 24 percent (Szabo). Smoking bans have also reduced health care costs in Starkville, Miss., by $302,000 (Szabo). Although tiny steps have been taken in the fight against second-hand smoke, it is not enough. More information should be readily available and made public about the dangers of

Should Smoking Be Banned From Public Places? What Are The Effects Of Smoking? Do We Have The Right To Ban Smoking In Public Places, Taking Into Consideration The Morals And Ethics

1260 words - 6 pages government's point of view, smoking should be limited in certain enclosed and crowded places such as discos, cinemas and public transports. This way, they can still make profit from selling cigarettes and save money from passive smoking diseases. From the 3rd world farmers' who gather the tobacco point of view, smoking should not be banned from public places because they would have no alternate way to make money.Currently, smoking is already the biggest

Why Smoking Should Not Be Banned

675 words - 3 pages Why Smoking Should Not Be BanSmoking is a source of great controversy, and most individuals either support it or oppose it. Almost no middle ground exists on the topic of tobacco smoking, and individuals against smoking have taken great strides to promote the cessation of smoking in public places. Unfortunately, this has led to the formation of numerous laws that forbid smoking in specific public places like restaurants, bars, parks, and in some

Cigarette Smoking Should Not Be Banned

1974 words - 8 pages Should cigarette smoking be banned for everyone in the United States? Why? Why not? Should those who chose their time smoking to relieve stress, personal enjoyment, or simply just because, have to lose their right to what makes them happy? Smoking tobacco products has been around for decades and in many different forms. Should personal rights be pushed aside to please those around us that disagree with the so called “disgusting habit”? In the

Smoking In Public Places - Safe or Not?

749 words - 3 pages Smoking in Public, Safe or Not?      According to a article titled “Restricting Smoking in Public Places?” published in the July 21, 1986 U.S. News and World Report, five thousand people die each year because they have breathed someone else’s smoke (65).This finding alone should be enough to encourage smokers to consider the health of those non-smokers around them before they light a cigarette in a public place

Smoking Should Be Banned

1012 words - 5 pages Agreement in 1998 the TV adds for cigarette companies were banned. Smoking is a detrimental practice, which even though is carried out by individuals of their own accord, affects the surroundings and thus should be banned. Ever since people started smoking researchers had been searching for its adverse effects to the human body. Fritz Lickint, in 1929 presented formal statistical evidence that cigarette smoking leads to lung cancer. This

Should Smoking be Permitted in Certain Places?

885 words - 4 pages Should Smoking be Permitted in Certain Places?Millions of Americans smoke or at one time have smoked. What effect is their smoke on non-smokers and the environment around them? Yes, no one is stopping them from smoking but that is not the issue. The question is ,however, should smokers be allowed to smoke in places such as restaurants, bars, banks, universities, airports, or large sporting areas and other public places around non-smokers.In the

Smoking in Public Places

1336 words - 5 pages 5). Smoking in public places should be banned because of all the harm that it causes to the people. I think that if people would stop smoking it would help a lot. More people would be healthy and less people would be exposed to second hand smoke. It would also save the people who do not smoke a lot of time and money because they would not have to pay for medical bills. It also is not fair to those who do not chose to smoke and still have to

Smoking should be banned from all Public Areas

1287 words - 6 pages cigarette butts are also a major fire risk.” This article proves how much cigarettes are littered, and how much it costs to clean up the mess. If smoking were to be banned in all public areas, there would be a very high chance that people would not be littering their cigarette butts in public areas. This is because without the areas to smoke in, there won’t be any places to litter the unlit and unused cigarettes. In accordance to the smoking in

Similar Essays

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places

875 words - 4 pages right. If other people who cannot endure, they can select staying out of those areas. (Allanah 4)From my point of view, smoking should be banned in public places. Firstly, smoking gets a fire easily. Many people who like throwing the cigarette butt that does not go out near the tree. When the tree is burnt out by that cigarette butt, it probably causes the disaster that we cannot estimate. I have heard many conflagrations that are caused by the

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places?

755 words - 4 pages Although smoking tobacco in public places is considered a personal choice, it does not have any advantages. Smoking causes various amounts of issues to a person’s health. First and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, and not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the mouth, lung and throat. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places In Ontario?

1182 words - 5 pages Imagine being at a nice restaurant, waiting to enjoy a great meal. Leaning in to takethat first bite, a puff of reeking cigarette smoke surrounds the food, and it is not verypleasant. A debatable topic that has brought on numerous attention is whether or notsmoking should be banned in public areas in Ontario, such as restaurants. Smoking inpublic areas should be taken into great consideration. There are three significant reasonswhy this is

Smoking Should Be Banned In All Public Places

1315 words - 5 pages all parts of the world has much controversy because people some people agree about smoke in public areas, but others who do not smoke complain about that; so much so that it has now become an issue. So, should smoking be banned in all public places? I would say yes, they should. Firstly, when many smokers smoke in public places, the people around them who do not smoke breathe in the smoke and they become passive