This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Social Influence Research Do The Ends Justify The Means?

1012 words - 4 pages

Social Influence Research - Do the Ends Justify the Means?

To what extent does the importance of social influence research,
justify the methods used in its investigation?

The debate about ethics in psychology focuses on two areas: protection
of participants and benefiting society. This is a double obligation
dilemma as if some psychologists are not allowed to do certain
experiments because of ethical restraints; this can cause problems
with validity. In social psychology, these psychologists have an
obligation to use their research skills to advance our knowledge of
human behaviour, for the ultimate aim of human betterment.

Milgram’s study into obedience involved participants becoming a
‘teacher’ and applying an electric shock to the ‘learner’ (who was a
confederate) when they answered a word association question
incorrectly. The participant was not aware that the shocks they
administered were false and some believed they may have killed a man.

In this instance therefore, the code of conduct and ethical guidelines
published by the British Psychological Society (BPS) and American
Psychological Society (APS) in 1993 were broken in more than one way.
The participants’ right to withdraw was disabled as the prods given by
the experimenter (such as “please continue” etc) made the participants
feel that they had no choice but to continue. The were also involved
in deception as they thought they had administered real shocks and
were not informed of the confederate being present. This study,
however, was conducted in the 1950’s and the ethical guidelines were
not in position and therefore this study may be published in modern
day text books. Conversely, Milgram’s study has benefited society as
it has informed us that Milgram’s original aim – which was to find out
why the holocaust happened and whether the obedience levels were so
high because that was how German society operated – that not only are
the German’s capable of obedience to this level, but all societies
around the world also.

The findings of this research seem to justify the ethical guidelines
broken as this experiment is a crucial insight into understanding the
extent to which people obey. Also, this experiment would not have
worked if it had followed all rules as the participants would have
known the shocks were false and therefore the experiment would not
have been so impactive. The participant would know he/she was not
harming the learner in anyway and therefore be much more willing to
follow orders.

Zimbardo’s prison experiment was a lab based experiment involving
participants being...

Find Another Essay On Social Influence Research - Do the Ends Justify the Means?

The Ends Justify the Means: Wrong is Wrong

1746 words - 7 pages Mercedes Briscoe Ms.Glisson ELA III 5-29-14 Wrong is Wrong Saying that “the ends justify the means” is an invalid statement , those agreeing with this statement obviously believe that killing, stealing, and cheating does not matter as long as it has a good outcome and the goal is obtained.The phrase “the ends justify the means” refers to the morality of an action

Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Good Ends do NOT Justify Immoral Means

2566 words - 10 pages possible (Chesire, 580). Good ends do not justify immoral means. Works Cited Abboud, Dr. Amin. “The Stem Cell Debate”. ABI Information Sheet. Australasian Bioethics Information, June 2002: 1-4. Print. “Basics of Stem Cell Research.” Resources: Stem Cell Research. American Medical Association. 2013. Web. 12 Dec. 2013. Chesire, Jr., Dr. William P. “Small Things Considered: The Ethical Significance of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” New

Do The Ends Justify The Means? A Comparison Of The Writings Of Niccolo Machiavelli And Lao Tzu

1252 words - 5 pages Lao Tzu's rhetoric where doing is in of itself and end, outward appearances don't matter so much as what you do and what you do not. Whilst in Machiavelli's school of thought the means often justify the ends, principles are only held when they make you look good. If one were to try and follow both ways of governing they would in the end fail for lack of cohesion in their judgements and their methods. Though both may be viable ways to rule of the

"Do Ends Justify the Means?" Discusses what Presidents of the past have done and how they may compare to President Bush

723 words - 3 pages Do Ends Justify the Means?"The ends justify the means" to me means that one should use any means necessary to accomplish what one wants. In certain times of our history this could have been the basis for survival. In today's society a person should be careful of what they say or do. Leaders statements can be held to a high standard of truthfulness. A leader should not stretch, twist, or distort facts and get away with it. President Johnson's

Does the End Justify the Means

905 words - 4 pages favor. Even though killing a person is not right, Brutus thought that he was doing it for the good of Rome; therefore he was doing nothing wrong. This relates to “does the end justify the means” because Brutus believes that the end, which is freedom for Rome, justifies the assassination of Caesar ("In "Julius Caesar," How Do "the Ends Justify the Means?"). Cassius it somewhat manipulating Brutus into thinking that what he is doing is right, and

“Does the End Justify the Means?”

992 words - 4 pages plebeians of his belief that Caesar was a danger to Rome because of his great ambition, and the power he would soon possess. When Brutus finishes his monologue, the plebeians seem to be persuaded and agree with his motives. Therefore, we can see that Brutus would agree in this situation that the ends do indeed justify the means. He believed that saving Rome from any possible dangers could be achieved through the assassination of Caesar. He is

Does The End Ever Justify The Means?

714 words - 3 pages One of the most hotly debated topics in the field of ethics is the question, “Does the end justify the means?” This topic is divided on the primary basis of whether an objectionable action can be justified by the end result of the action or actions. It is fair to argue that as long as the end result is considered beneficial by a majority of the population, any course of action to achieve that result would be considered justified. Another

“Does the End Ever Justify the Means?”

915 words - 4 pages the public. However, the question appears, “does the end ever justify the means?” In my opinion, I do think that the end of this dilemma is justified. Edward, a former employee of the NSA, released to the public, confidential information about our government invading our privacy. It is estimated that Snowden took about 1.7 million classified documents containing information about the NSA. The public knows the most about his leak concerning phone

Does the End Ever Justify the Means?

931 words - 4 pages Does the end ever really justify the means? This is a phrase that is quite common amongst readers, namely when reading a tragedy such as The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. When reading this drama, a person may sit and ponder this question for quite some time, depending on what side they agree with and how the “justice” was portrayed, and decide if it was even justice at all. My personal opinion on this question after reading Julius Caesar is that the

Does The End Justify The Means?

881 words - 4 pages lost their reason. Bear with me. My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” (Shakespear 882-883) Another act of betrayal occurs in Act IV when Octavious and Antony decide to not give Lepidus any power, and to take some of Caesars will for themselves. (Shakespeare) The topic; “does the end justify the means”; can be summed up in one phrase “A good outcome excuses any wrongs committed to attain it

Does the End Justify the Means?

712 words - 3 pages everywhere. Are these conflicts just or will the outcome not outweigh the losses that will inevitably happen. One such case that we can look at to see if the end did justify the means is by looking at both sides of the first Gulf War. During the first Persian Gulf War, the United States had a very distinct goal. That goal was to enforce the United Nations Security Council by removing Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi military from Kuwait. To see if the end

Similar Essays

In Sociological Research, Do The Ends Justify The Means ?

962 words - 4 pages In Sociological Research, Do The Ends Justify The Means ? Discuss.This essay intends to define the purpose of ethics, ethical issues and considerations in research methods. It will look at the differences in research methods and various case studies to support them, but mainly focusing on participant observation.The definition of 'ethics' in the "Oxford Concise Dictionary" (1995) states a set of moral principles adj. 'ethical' - relating to

Do The Ends Justify The Means

1808 words - 8 pages normal life. This is such a big problem because if in the end it does not work, it will be a waste of not only money, but time as well. The argument that most people have about continuing the research and trials is that the ends will justify the means. The end to the human trails is that they well be able to have a cure for patient with these diseases. Many people can look upon this as killing one to save a thousand. People can kill the cell

When The Ends Justify The Means

952 words - 4 pages When the Ends Justify the Means It is commonly believed by both lay people and political philosophers alike that an authoritative figure is good and just so long as he or she acts in accordance with various virtues. If the actions of a ruler are tailored toward the common good of the people rather than himself, then that ruler is worthy of occupying the status of authority. By acting in accordance with social and ethical norms, the ruler is

Do The Ends Justify The Means? Analysis Of Stalin, Mao Zedong And Gorbachev

1392 words - 6 pages his efforts, and the reputation he earned for his country, comparable in importance to the reputation of steel power that China and USSR had under Stalin and Mao. (CNN)In order to understand whether the ends justify the means of a leader, one must evaluate the importance of the leader's goals in comparison to the importance of personal freedoms, and the right for a safe, and happy life. During Joseph Stalin's and Mao Zedong's rules, lives were