Socrates And Love Essay

1347 words - 5 pages

In the Symposium, written by Plato, Socrates and others engage in a dialogue in the home of Agathon on love. Instead of "singing the honours" (94) of love like the other participants, Socrates uses a retelling of a discussion that he had with a woman named Diotima to tell the audience of what he perceives to be the truth of love.

He first speaks to Agathon in order to be on the same wavelength with him. Socrates asks Agathon a series of questions - which leads to Agathon being thoroughly confused and completely re-thinking his entire speech he just made. Agathon is no longer sure if Love is beautiful and good, which was his primary definition of it before.

Socrates has Agathon confirm that when one does not have the thing that he desires and loves, that is when he desires and loves it. They agree that one "loves what he lacks and has not" (96). In Agathon's view of love that he expressed earlier, love is always of beautiful things. Therefore, if one loves what he lacks, then "Love lacks and has not beauty" (96), Socrates says. Agathon says this must be the case and no longer has any idea of his previous statements. If Love loves beautiful things, then it is not itself beautiful. And if everything beautiful is good, then love also lacks goodness.

Socrates tells Agathon that Diotima, a woman who advised him on the matters of love, had asked him the same series of questions before. This leads Socrates to ask Diotima, `if Love is neither beautiful nor good, is it ugly and bad?' Diotima says no, because the nature of love is in between the opposites of ugly and beautiful, good and bad.

"He is not good and not beautiful, as you admit yourself, but do not imagine for that reason any the more that he must be ugly and bad, but something between these two (97)," Diotima says.

The reason for this is that Love, as a mythical creature, was conceived of Poverty and Plenty at Aphrodite's birthday party. Therefore, Love is a mixture of the blessings of Plenty and tragedy of Poverty.

Because all gods are happy and beautiful, Diotima says Love cannot really be a god. She insists that Love is a great spirit, "for all spiritual is between divine and mortal" (98). Love, as a spirit, serves like a middle man between the gods and humans on Earth.

The only way gods communicate through humans is through these spirits, Diotima insists, because these spirits have the wisdom to intercede for the gods. The gods do not love wisdom because they are already wise and the foolish do not love wisdom because they are ignorant of the fact that they are ignorant of wisdom.

Diotima tells Socrates that philosophers (lovers of wisdom) are in between the gods and the ignorant. She says Love is one of the philosophers, because he is in between wisdom and ignorance. This is because his father Plenty has wisdom but his mother does not. Diotima, who says wisdom is one of the most beautiful things, believes "Love is a love for the beautiful, so Love...

Find Another Essay On Socrates and Love

The Trial and Death of Socrates

1017 words - 4 pages loved by the Gods,” would be a poor definition. Euthyphro comes back with a third definition correcting the second which is “Pious acts are loved by ALL gods.” Socrates introduces the “Euthyphro Dilemma” and states “Is it pious because it is loved by the gods, or do the gods love it because it is pious?” This question Socrates affirms that if the first part is true, then it’s not a definition because it shows that all gods love pious actions but

Socrates and Alcibiades Essay

1316 words - 5 pages Philosophy and the Human Condition Socrates and Alcibiades In Plato’s Symposium, he describes the party which Agathon had several famous people of his time over for dinner. Those in attendance include Phaedrus, Pausanias, Eryximachus, Aristophanes, and Socrates. The party begins by the members of the party eating dinner and then beginning to talk to about love. Each person gives a eulogy of love. After everyone has spoken, including

The Impious Socrates

1482 words - 6 pages Socrates was prompted to inquire into the essence of piety after he was sentenced to death on the grounds he impious. Socrates' love of challenging and questioning other's knowledge got him accused of creating social unrest. In response to the disturbance, a politician charged Socrates with impiety. Impiety is the most obvious grounds on which to charge an inquiring mind, because religion is not open to questioning. In theory a democratic

Orwell and Plato: Comparison of the Hero Figure

660 words - 3 pages themselves. They can not merely accept lies from society. In contrast, Winston thought on being ethical in Society is to make himself like everybody else in the Party, “He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother” (326). He made himself love Big Brother because it is ethical in the society of the Party. He knows that going against them will make trouble for himself. There are aspects of similarities between Socrates and Winston

Comparison of Socrates and Siddhartha Guatama Buddha

896 words - 4 pages Socrates and Siddhartha Guatama Buddha have many similarities; they both believe in the importance of justice and good, and a simpler way of life. However, they have different goals: Socrates concerns with worldly meanings and codes, he deals with truth and morals. Buddha concerns with attaining the outer-worldly through mastering the worldly. Socrates relinquishes sensual desires in hopes of spiritual rebirth after death and achieving


682 words - 3 pages Renault says that he was only giving them guidance so that they may guide themselves and be free of petty problems. This guidance and advice caused these young men to re-think their attitudes. Indeed Alexias, Xenophon, and especially Plato were all changed by Socrates. They loved Socrates like a mother or father: pp. 392, 'In a word,' said Xenophon, 'We love him.' This love for Socrates was often misinterpreted as love being lost for family, through

Socrates Sides With Creon Or A

1487 words - 6 pages they will let Socrates go as long as he promises to never to inquiry others and to stop philosophizing. They add that if they catch him continuing his practice that they will put him to death. Socrates responds, "Athenians, I respect and I love you, but I'll obey the god rather than you."(Apology of Socrates 21) Through this one can see that he does respect the state but there are just things that the state rules on that he can not justify so he

Socrates irrelgious or impious

1153 words - 5 pages “I’m prosecuting my father as a wrongdoer…” (5e-6a), second what is dear or approved by a god is piety, third what all deities love, pious and impious are relatively equivalent. Socrates finds his response unsatisfying and ultimately calls quits “I wasn’t urging you to teach me about one or two of those many things that are holy, but rather about the form itself…” (7b-10) “but, you’re not eager to teach me… you’ve turned aside just when you were on

Plato's Symposium

1774 words - 7 pages named Diotima once told him. The speech was a powerful one, but before the night was over, a drunk Alcibiades entered. He was asked to make a eulogy for Love as well, but instead, talked about the nature of Socrates. The nature of Love and the nature of Socrates turned out to be extremely similar. In the Symposium, Socrates can be seen as the embodiment of Love itself.      The notion of love that was understood at the end of the Symposium came

Different Definitions of the Word "Pious" Depicted in Plato's Socratic Dialog Euthyphro

1307 words - 5 pages impious. Of course, something cannot simultaneously be pious and impious at the same time. For this reason, Euthyphro must either reject the claim that what the gods love is pious, or reject the claim that the gods are at war with one another. The views cannot be held consistently at the same time. Euthyphro chooses to forgo this definition of piety (8A-8B). Socrates once again presses Euthyphro for a definition of the pious. Euthyphro argues

Was Socrates guilty or not?

1076 words - 4 pages immediately. Socrates thinks that if he corrupt the youth there would be a lot of complaints from the groups which were affected by his corruption - kids or their parents but non of them made charges.In Socrates' speech there is belief that every charge that was carried to him does not accuse him of braking law or committing crime. He states "I men of Athens, salute you and love you, but I will obey the god rather then you; as long as I breathe

Similar Essays

Socrates And Love Essay

1245 words - 5 pages them, then the piety of an action would depend on the whims of the gods.2. If the gods loved pious actions because they were the right actions, then it can be said that there must exist some non-divine source of value (Apology, 2000).By these two possible answers, Socrates almost tells his listeners that a pious action need not be one that is defined by what the gods say; it may be one that is morally right, and so, the gods love it.In view of the

Aristophanes’ Clouds A Satyr Play Written In 419 Bce

1337 words - 5 pages extreme disbelief in the Greek gods, but he does do some things which can be seen as doubt in the gods. In Apology, Socrates hubristically set out to disprove the oracle at Delphi, a rebellious act that “refutes the divination” and thus displays Socrates lack of faith in the gods of Athens (Apology 21b). Socrates questions the praise of the god Eros in Agathon’s speech and disproves that Eros is a god at all, for “love needs beauty, and does not

Socrates's Philosophizing Essay

658 words - 3 pages , what is pious and impious is love and hatred for the Gods. Socrates asks Euthyphro, what pious and impious means. Socrates asks questions, cross examining Euthyphro. What Socrates ends up finding out is no definitive answer. Socrates asks if being pious is doing deeds to the Gods to be loved, or being loved by the Gods for not doing impious deeds. At Euthyphro believes what is dear to the Gods is pious and what is not dear to the Gods is

Socrates As Philosopher King Essay

1720 words - 7 pages death.  But was he moderate?  According to Socrates, moderation lies not in restraining one's desires.  Instead, true moderation comes only with love of truth.4  In The Republic, Socrates is forced into a discussion about the nature of justice, virtue, etc.  Although he enters into the discussion against his will, he never imposes his views on others.  Instead, like a sincere seeker of truth, he acknowledges other points of view, and uses their