This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Socrates And Thrasymachus In Republic Essay

2195 words - 9 pages

Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic

Socrates and Thrasymachus have a dialogue in Chapter 2 of Republic which progresses from a discussion of the definition of morality, to an understanding of the expertise of ruling, and eventually to a debate on the state of human nature. The Thrasymachian view of human nature has interesting implications in regards to Thomas Nagel’s ideal of egalitarianism, and Barbara Ehrenreich’s discontentment with the economic disparity in our democratic society. Although Thrasymachus is thwarted in conversation, Glaucon finds the outcome not entirely conclusive and directs Socrates to proving that morality, in and of itself, is a worthwhile pursuit.

Thrasymachus opens the discussion with Socrates claiming, “morality is the advantage of the stronger party.” (Republic 338c) By this he means ‘moral’ actions are those in accordance with the laws of the stronger party. He explicates his position by saying, “each government passes laws with a view to its own advantage: a democracy makes democratic laws, a dictatorship makes dictatorial laws… In so doing, each government makes it clear that what is right and moral for its subjects is what is to its own advantage.” (Republic 338e) In this example Thrasymachus claims that “morality is the advantage of the current government.” (Republic 339a) In giving this claim Thrasymachus implies that:

1. Morality is not objective.

2. Morality is defined as compliance with the laws given by the governing party.

3. The governing party creates laws based on what (it thinks!) will serve its own advantage.

4. The governing party creates morality for its subjects with the purpose of serving its own advantage.

Thrasymachus defines ‘right’ as acting ‘morally’, in “obedience [with] the government”. (Republic 339c) He affirms that, “subjects must act in accordance with any law that is passed, and… this constitutes doing right”. (Republic 339c) In defining ‘right’ and ‘moral’ on such grounds, it is clear that he holds a radically different view than Socrates.

Socrates’ rebuttal cites that Thrasymachus’ claim is inconsistent. Socrates claims that morality is not necessarily the advantage of the stronger party as Thrasymachus claimed because rulers could make laws that serve as disadvantages. Socrates says, “you have agreed that it is right to do things which are not to the advantage of the government and the stronger party. When the rulers mistakenly issue orders which are bad for themselves, and since you claim that it is right for people to act in conformity with all the government’s orders, then… doesn’t it necessarily follow that it is right to do the opposite of what your position affirmed?” (Republic 339e) In giving this line of reasoning, Socrates has not taken into account that Thrasymachus’ claim is based on morality being subjective, created by those in power.

The question is then begged of Thrasymachus, whether or not he views the stronger...

Find Another Essay On Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic

Justice in The Republic by Socrates

645 words - 3 pages In The Republic, Socrates tries to find the answer to a debatable question. What is justice? Throughout Book 1, he is given a couple of definitions that were at first incoherent to him and so he decided to clear them up by questioning Cephalus’s and his son Polemarchus’s definitions of “justice” . In Book 1, Socrates is about to leave from a religious festival when a group of men stopped him and convinced him to stay for the late night

Present and Discuss the Views submitted by Socrates and Thrasymachius in the First Book of Platos Republic

2201 words - 9 pages In the first book of the Republic Socrates and Thrasymachus argue about the nature of justice. Thrasymachus claims that justice is the advantage of the stronger. He also claims that Socrates’ arguments against that position stem from a naive set of beliefs about the real intentions of rulers, and an uncritical approach to the way words acquire their meaning. Present the arguments on both sides. Who do you think is right? Justify your position

Socrates and Plato in Phaedo

1185 words - 5 pages Socrates a classical Greek philosopher and character of Plato’s book Phaedo, defines a philosopher as one who has the greatest desire of acquiring knowledge and does not fear death or the separation of the body from the soul but should welcome it. Even in his last days Socrates was in pursuit of knowledge, he presents theories to strengthen his argument that the soul is immortal. His attempts to argue his point can’t necessarily be considered

The Forms in Plato's Republic and Meno

1638 words - 7 pages around them to be real and do not recognize the existence of a higher level of reality in the intelligible realm. True knowledge can thus only be obtained through proper education, so that the soul may recollect the concept of forms.In Plato's Republic, Socrates makes use of three major analogies to support his Theory of Forms. They were told in reference to the philosopher-king, who Socrates states would be the ideal ruler for a utopian society

Justice in Plato's Republic and Hobbes' Leviathan

2841 words - 11 pages One of the main concepts in both Plato's Republic and Hobbes' Leviathan is justice. For Plato, the goal of his Republic is to discover what justice is and to demonstrate that it is better than injustice. Plato does this by explaining justice in two different ways: through a city or polis and through an individual human beings soul. He uses justice in a city to reveal justice in an individual. For Hobbes, the term justice is used to explain

Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates

1231 words - 5 pages Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates Upon reading Plato, The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates strongly held views on the relationship between morality and laws become apparent to the reader. Equally, Socrates makes clear why laws should be followed and why disobedience to the law is rarely justified. Finally, he makes clear his views regarding civil disobedience. Socrates’ view on morality is that anyone can do wrong

The Presentation of Socrates' Arguements in Plato’s Apology and Crito

967 words - 4 pages In both Plato’s Apology and Crito, Plato presents Socrates arguments clearly and precisely. Socrates is wise man with a different perspective on life, which presents us with a mass of contradictions. Socrates is an expressive man, yet he never recorded any works. He is ignorant, but wrongfully convicted who is willing to fight his unjust execution. Behind these dilemmas is an opposition not often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic of

Erroneus Assumptions in The Trial and Death of Socrates

2336 words - 9 pages Erroneus Assumptions in The Trial and Death of Socrates In Plato's Crito, Socrates explains to his old friend Crito his reasons for refusing an offer to help him escape execution. One of the tools Socrates uses to convince Crito of the righteousness of his decision is a hypothetical argument concerning the state and laws of Athens. Central to this argument is the congeniality that Socrates had always found in Athens, reflected by the fact

Arguments of Plato in The Republic and Aristotle in Poetics

1195 words - 5 pages scholars including Sigmund Freud, Philip Sydney and Adam Smith, but this essay will focus on the arguments outlined by Plato in The Republic and Aristotle in Poetics, attempting to demonstrate the different features of imitation (mimesis) and what it involves for them both. In Plato’s The Republic, he discusses what imitation (mimesis) signifies to him and why he believed it was not worthy of the credit or appreciation it was so often given. In

Art and Architecture in Germany and Czech Republic

1121 words - 4 pages My trip to Germany and the Czech Republic was very exciting. At first, I was not sure what to think about it. They are foreign countries and this was my first trip out of the United States. I did however think they would be much different from America. I knew that there would be many older buildings and castles in each country, since they are older than the United States. I also did not expect to see as many skyscrapers in these cities. I

Researching Socratic Pedagogy and Education in Plato's Republic

4911 words - 20 pages Researching Socratic Pedagogy and Education in Plato's Republic ABSTRACT: Though Plato never wrote a dialogue that explicitly asks, "What is education?", few argue that he is uninterested in the subject; after all, Plato, like Socrates, was a teacher. In his magnum opus, the Republic, Plato deals with education repeatedly. The eduction of the guardian class and the allegory of the cave present two landmark pedagogical passages. Yet to catch

Similar Essays

Thrasymachus And Socrates Essay

904 words - 4 pages In Plato’s The Republic, we, the readers, are presented with two characters that have opposing views on a simple, yet elusive question: what is justice? In this paper, I will explain Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, as well as Socrates’s rebuttals and differences in opinion. In addition, I will comment on the different arguments made by both Socrates and Thrasymachus, and offer critical commentary and examples to illustrate my agreement or

Plato’s Republic: Justice And Injustice In Thrasymachus' Account

6506 words - 26 pages York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1995), "The Sophists," pp. 63-73. (3) For example, Seth Bernadette speaks of subjects in relation to the tyrant and that Thrasymachus makes the "tyrant the truth of his definition" concerning the issue of justice and injustice. See Bernadette’s work entitled, Socrates’ Second Sailing: On Plato’s Republic (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pr., 1989), pp. 20-32. Also see G. B. Kerferd, "The Doctrine of Thrasymachus in

Thrasymachus’ View Of Justice And Socrates’ Re

1103 words - 4 pages One of the greatest literary minds of all time, William Shakespeare, gave these words to one of his characters, ?To be? Or not to be? That is the Question.? At each step a similar crossroad arises where one must choose a path or means to an end. Plato?s Republic tackles a similar question where Socrates must prove that ?to be just? is a more desirable and advantageous means to an end (which in this case is total life). In order to accomplish

The Role Of Women And Marriage In Socrates' The Republic

1114 words - 4 pages In his constant quest to find the true meaning of justice and the creation of the ideal city Socrates finds that while many of the element of the city have been properly set forth he forgot to take into account the place women will have in the city and the idea of child-rearing. After some careful discussion about the nature of women and how it would relate to their particular role in the city Socrates and Adeimantus come to the agreement that