This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Socrates, Aristotle, And Glaucon Essay

686 words - 3 pages

Plato’s character in “The Ring of Gyges” is trying to convey certain points about human nature and wisdom. In Glaucon’s fictional story, Gyges is a shepherd who stumbles upon a mysterious ring which allows him the power to become invisible. Gyges eventually gives up his lowly life as a shepherd and becomes an authoritative and crooked dictator due to the power of the ring. Glaucon’s main point in this story is that people are inherently immoral and will look out for themselves over the good of others. Due to his assumption about the nature of the human race Glaucon proclaims that in order to keep human’s from causing damage to others our social order should emphasize a government that will contain their constituents. Glaucon’s proposed social order became the building blocks of the social contract theory of government; “People in a society mutually agreeing not to harm one another and setting up sanctions when they do,” (Caste, 2014).
Glaucon makes multiple points ...view middle of the document...

Following this line of thought Glaucon suggests that “There’s nothing intrinsically good about being good. The only thing we really need to worry about is whether society will punish us for our actions,” (Caste, 2014). The last point Glaucon makes is that he expects that all of society would use the ring to fulfill immoral needs and wants; human nature predicts that people act morally only to avoid the inevitable punishments for immoral acts.
I believe both Socrates and Aristotle would disagree with Glaucon’s ideas about the morality of people and how they achieve happiness. Socrates disagreed with Glaucon’s conclusion for the remaining pages of the dialogue; for example, Socrates and Aristotle believed in areté: the belief that everything people do is done in the desire to make themselves happy and that these people do these things to the best of their ability. A great example of Socrates disagreeing with Glaucon can be seen in the example of a physician doing his or her job to treat patients. Based on Glaucon’s ideals the doctor is only considering him or herself in treating the patient; meaning the doctor should try to keep the patient sick in order to maximize his or her profits on treating that patient. While Socrates argues that the physician will do the best they can to cure the patient because of the ideal of areté; they truly wish to do their duty and they gain satisfaction from doing that. Aristotle and Socrates states that the best type of society would be one in which every citizen is doing the best they can at a job which suits them and are, therefore; fulfilling areté. The main differences between Socrates’s ideas, Aristotle’s ideas, and Glaucon’s ideas are the way people achieve happiness. Socrates believes happiness comes from doing your best at your job and for society, Aristotle believed the same thing but added that people needed leisure time to relax and achieve happiness. Glaucon, on the other hand, argues happiness comes from selfish fulfillment of personal desires no matter the consequences for others in society.

References:
Caste, N. J. (2014). Plato: The Republic. Political Philosophy: Government and Human Nature (1st edition). : Cognella, Inc..

Find Another Essay On Socrates, Aristotle, and Glaucon

a city for the stronger Essay

1178 words - 5 pages In Plato’s Republic and in the Politics of Aristotle, we encounter different views in how to create justice and wisdom in a city, while both philosophers try to find the best way to rule such city. Plato and Aristotle attempt to create what they believe is the ideal city which can create happiness among its people. Since Aristotle was a student of Socrates we can encounter similarities in their views but at the same time Aristotle presents in

Plato Essay

1284 words - 5 pages ), and it operated until 529 AD, when it was closed by Justinian I of Byzantium, who saw it as a threat to the propagation of Christianity. Many intellectuals were schooled in the Academy, the most prominent one being Aristotle. Plato and Socrates Plato made himself seem as though he were part of the Socratic entourage but never says so explicitly. In the Phaedo the title character lists those who were in attendance at the prison on Socrates

Plato's Republic

1034 words - 4 pages Plato's Republic In Plato’s Republic, Glaucon is introduced to the reader as a man who loves honor, sex, and luxury. As The Republic progresses through books and Socrates’ arguments of how and why these flaws make the soul unhappy began to piece together, Glaucon relates some of these cases to his own life, and begins to see how Socrates’ line of reasoning makes more sense than his own. Once Glaucon comes to this realization, he embarks on a

Being Versus Knowing: The Distinction

876 words - 4 pages context surrounding this passage, as described above, is a segment of the larger conversation that Socrates has been having and will continue to have with Glaucon. Socrates indirectly refers to a previous part of their conversation when he reminds Glaucon that there is a "distinction" between the "multiplicity of things" and the Thing itself (e.g. the Beautiful, the Good). This previous part of their conversation contains initial

peenis

1168 words - 5 pages composed of various factors, including how indebted the citizen is to the state, loyalty, and ramifications of disobedience. Socrates is often used as an example in questioning loyalty to the state, just as his following student’s, Plato and Aristotle. However, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle vary greatly in opinion of how an idealized society should be run. The following paper explain the divergences that the intellects had in regards to citizenship

Political Justice: Plato and Aristotle

2208 words - 9 pages citizen upholds and respects the constitution. He claims, "a good citizen should know and have the capacity both to be ruled and to rule" (Aristotle, 92).In the Republic, Socrates gives three waves that he believes are necessary to achieve justice in an unhealthy city. The first wave states that there should be equality among men and women of the Guardian class. He writes that men and women of the Guardian class are to share "everything in common

Pabla

1383 words - 6 pages Reflection of Good on Justice in Plato's Republic Book II Within the close of Book II of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus and Glaucon are still unconvinced of Socrates' perceptions on justice. They both accuse Socrates in rejecting every idea that is proposed on the matter and stubbornly refuses to provide his own perspectives. At this time Glaucon demands more from Socrates to truly convince him that the benefits of being unjust truly outweigh

Antigone- Bastion of Virtue

1653 words - 7 pages professed how the ruler is the most "happy and blessed" when he makes slaves of his citizens (Plato, Republic). This viewpoint was presented and adapted by Glaucon in his dialogue with Socrates. Glaucon stated that justice was a compromise "between the best of all, which is to do injustice and not be punished, and the worst of all, which is to suffer injustice without the power of retaliation," (Plato, Republic). Therefore, justice only exists when

Comparing Plato and Aristotle

2127 words - 9 pages justice as the advantage of the stronger. Justice is not to the advantage of everyone but to the advantage of the rulers. Socrates proves that justice brings unity to any group of people, because it allows them to trust and rely on one another. The discussion of justice is continued in the beginning of Book II. Glaucon enters the conversation and he divides all things into three categories: 1) Those that are pleasurable for themselves and their

Demonstrating the Virtues of the Just Life

833 words - 3 pages friends, Glaucon and Adeimantus, that in fact it pays to be just. After much debate and even the creation of a fictional city, a resolution of some kind is reached. Socrates does succeed in convincing his opposition that it pays to be just, however he does not demonstrate said fact. The difference is subtle, but profound. The debate begins when Glaucon makes the powerful claim that, “the life of the unjust man is, after all, far

A Close Analysis On Plato's Republic. Answers To Such Questions As: What Is Socrates' Reply To Thrasymachus's Notion That Injustice Makes One "Stronger And More Effective" Than Justice (34)?

628 words - 3 pages conclusion that Socrates and Thrasymachus have reached on justice. Glaucon decides to explain the origins of the meaning of justice. People who decided "neither to do wrong nor to suffer it" (44) enforced laws which they called "lawful and right" (44). Justice was established as a form of compromise not because it is good or righteous but because no man is worthy of being unjust (44). Glaucon continues by saying that men practice justice because they

Similar Essays

Socrates, Plato, And Aristotle Essay

856 words - 3 pages Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, three men considered to be the quintessential basis of ancient Greek philosophy. Not only were they responsible for Greek enlightenment, but also foreshadowed the coming of Christ in there speculations. Plato, the protégé of Socrates, became the first to document the philosophy of his teacher, which in turn is passed down to Aristotle. This process of mentoring aided ancient man in the intellectual evolution

Politics Of Socrates, Plato And Aristotle By Walubo Jude Tadeo

990 words - 4 pages Socrates, Plato and Aristotle had virtually the same beliefs about man's relation to the State, although Plato's political theory of the State was more rational than Socrates or Aristotle's. Socrates, Plato and Aristotle all believed that man was not self-sufficient, they believed man would be most happy living in a State. They also believed that all men wanted to live the truly good life where they could be in tune with the truth and achieve

Socrates, Plato And Aristotle Cannot Be Considered As Members Of A Same Philosophical Movement

1024 words - 5 pages While they were either teachers or students of each other and were from the same location and era, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, were different. It has been suggested that they are from the same philosophical movement, but despite their similarities, they had very different ideas and focuses in their work. Socrates, Plato and Aristotle each had their own ideas and direction with their philosophy and had different directions in their

My Notes To Review For Final. The Brief Overview Of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, And Epicurus

847 words - 3 pages or false because it is 2) based on appearances - may change; 3) rely on things that are many and changing. Good is like a sun: 1) allows sight; 2) creator & sustainer of life in visible world; 3) purpose to life. Soul exists in particular part of our body 2. Aristotle A. believes that happiness is the end and "most people say that happiness includes pleasure that may be good or bad. So, if pleasures are bad then they can not be our goal