This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Socrates, Guilty Or Not Essay

954 words - 4 pages

Socrates, Guilty Or Not

Ancient Athens was the site of a growing culture. Philosophy was among the many improvements and discoveries being made. With these improvements and discoveries, great thinkers were able to stretch out their knowledge to new heights. The society they lived in, both welcomed and shunned their ideals. Socrates was one of these thinkers. It was because of Socrates open-mindedness that he was sentenced to death by two charges brought against him. One, Socrates corrupted the youth and two, Socrates believed in ‘false gods’. Yet, was Socrates guilty or not?

In the Apology, Socrates examines the charges brought against him by Meletus and tries to prove that they are false. The first charge brought against him is that he was corrupting the youth. Socrates responds to this by asking Meletus in his opinion, how Socrates was corrupting the youth. Meletus says that Socrates was teaching the youth to go against the government. Socrates asks if there was anyone who was beneficial for the youth. Meletus says that the council, jury, assembly, even the general public was beneficial to the youth and that Socrates was the only person corrupting them. Socrates claims that it was impossible for the one person to be capable of corrupting the youth when they had so many to show them in the right direction.

Socrates says that it is also impossible for everyone to know that is right for the youth. He goes on to give an example of a horse. Socrates explains that only one person would be able to train horses correctly, a horse trainer. A horse trainer has been instructed in how to raise horses. A person walking on the road would not be able to train horses properly, because the would have no previous knowledge or experience with training horses. Therefore, it would not be possible, for everyone in Athens to know what was best for the youth. Only those who had trained to teach discipline would be beneficial to the youth.

Meletus’s next charge is that Socrates ‘believes in false gods’. Socrates says that he believes in Divine Spirits. Meletus takes this statement to mean that Socrates says that if Meletus believed in gods and goddesses, then he must believe in Divine Spirits. For they are the children of the gods. After hearing this statement Meletus changes his story many times saying that Socrates did not believe in any gods at all. Meletus is not sure which one it should be and continues to change it back and forth. Meletus’s action of contradicting himself, clearly showing that the charge had no validity.

On the first charge that Meletus brought against Socrates that he, ‘corrupted the youth’, this charge could have been seen as true by many. Socrates was teaching his followers to think for themselves. The...

Find Another Essay On Socrates, Guilty Or Not

"Do you think there are any authors or books not listed in the `Chicago Canon` that should definitely not have been omitted? Discuss" Socrates

562 words - 2 pages or moral philosophy .Socrates used to spend most of his time walking around the streets just talking with townsfolk or stand contemplating for a few hours in one place. The essence of his activity was that he did not try to instruct people. Just the opposite, he made an impression that he was trying to learn something from them. He used to begin a conversation with questioning, pretending, that he knows nothing. He made his interlocutors see

The Charges Against Socrates Essay

895 words - 4 pages riddle and is trying it out : ' Will the wise Socrates realize that I am jesting and contradicting myself, or shall I deceive him and others?" Socrates shows what why I would vote not guilty. Socrates hit the nail on the head with this statement. If I were to vote I would vote not guilty because the previous quote. This is exactly how I perceive Meletus to be; a young man trying to prove something that he has no idea about. Continuously through

The Apology of Socrates

1093 words - 5 pages trying to convey to the jury is that he is a good man and he doesn’t put anything out on display, for his accusers will use it and spread rumors about him. Socrates speaks boldly of himself; he knows he is right. Socrates to me is not guilty of corrupting the youth, because Socrates said these youth you say I corrupted would have grown up by now and know that I wasn’t speaking the truth. The youth never said that Socrates miss lead them or gave them

Defense of Socrates

1579 words - 6 pages trial and not Meletus and so Socrates should do everything in his power to defend himself and make sure that the jury does not find him guilty. Socrates may not have given enough time for Meletus to respond, however, he did give him the opportunity and the fact that Meletus was not ready to respond or accidentally said something he did not want to say shows that Meletus has no real evidence leading to the conclusion that Socrates has corrupted

Socrates' Trial

835 words - 3 pages third issue Socrates was found guilty was because he was assumed to have polluted the children of Athens. This meant Socrates was damaging the minds of the future of Athens and this charge was not taken lightly. Meletus believed Socrates was truly able to cause harm to the future of Athens. Socrates stood by his innocence, “I cannot justly be charged with causing these men these men to turn good or bad, for I never either taught or professed to

Aristophanes’ Clouds a Satyr Play Written in 419 BCE

1337 words - 5 pages stronger,” thus teaching sophistry, a form of unjust speech, to the population— and more importantly to the malleable, corruptible youth— in Athens (Apology 18b). These charges hold some truth, albeit Plato’s Socrates is not as guilty as the Socrates in Clouds. In Clouds, Socrates’ students are studying those things under the ground and in the heavens. Strepsiades enters the thinkery of Socrates and witnesses the students literally with their

No One Is Above The Law

1345 words - 6 pages Euthypro is a text of dialogue between Socrates, an outspoken philosopher in ancient Athens, and Euthypro, preceding Socrates trial of corrupting the youth and creating his own gods. Apology is another text having the same author of Euthypro, in Plato, which gives an account of Socrates making his defense at his own trial. Based on the evidence presented in these texts, Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth or of creating his own gods

The Trial of Socrates

983 words - 4 pages or wisdom to do anything even remotely close to what Evenus does. Socrates never charged money for his lessons, and he never really did any formal teaching. He had followers, and they claim that they learned a lot from him. But the fact is, Socrates never did any formal instruction, so he never told people what to believe. Therefore, Socrates could not have corrupted the youth with his teaching, because he never did any teaching in the first

Socrates Defense

852 words - 3 pages charges, he is constantly talking about himself. If Socrates wanted to appease the judges so that he would not be found guilty, he could have made up or omit the parts about himself that caused so much trouble. The fact that Socrates knows that he is being persecuted for who he is and that he honestly describes himself, shows that he is staying true to himself and his beliefs through his trial. Through reason, Socrates is constantly searching for

A Hoax in Court

1551 words - 6 pages rules of law or equity. Meletus brought an elder man to court for corrupting the youth and for refusing to believe in the gods of the city. 501 Athenian male citizens sat in the jury to judge and base their decisions off Meletus’s accusations and Socrates’ defense to pronounce Socrates as guilty. Who is to declare that a trial has gone through the correct process to fully come to a decision of guilty or not guilty? Is a quick and speedy trial

A Hoax in Court: The Trial of Socrates

1726 words - 7 pages according to the rules of law or equity.” Meletus brought an elder man to court for corrupting the youth and for refusing to believe in the gods of the city. 501 Athenian male residents observed as the jury to magistrate and center their decisions off Meletus’s accusations and Socrates’ defense to pronounce Socrates as guilty. Who is to declare that a trial has gone through the correct procedure to fully come to a judgment of guilty or innocent

Similar Essays

Was Socrates Guilty Or Not? Essay

1076 words - 4 pages Plato wrote about trail of Socrates in ancient Athens. Writer design story in a way where we don't get to hear accusers, we are only able to hear an explanation of a person who was called to the court. In the end of the story Socrates is found guilty to be punished but does that judgment reflect real guiltiness?When we considering whether someone's is guilty or innocent, first we haveto look closer at the system of justice, rules that it follows

Is Socrates Innocent Or Guilty? Essay

1942 words - 8 pages Is Socrates Innocent or Guilty? Living in a democracy, everyone is exposed through television and other various forms of media everyday to numerous trials by jury. Usually they are rarely given a second thought, but every once in a while along comes a specific trial which captures the attention of the entire country. This goes the same for trials throughout centuries in our past. Although they did not have the same forms of media as in

The Apology Of Socrates: Guilty Or Innocent?

954 words - 4 pages The Apology of Socrates: Guilty or Innocent?    In any case of law, when considering truth and justice, one must first look at the validity of the court and the system itself.  In Socrates' case, the situation is no different.  One may be said to be guilty or innocent of any crime, but guilt or innocence is only as valid as the court it is subjected to.  Therefore, in considering whether Socrates is guilty or not, it must be kept in mind

To Accept Or Not Accept Socrates’ Theory Of Recollection As Sufficient Answer To Meno’s Paradox

1211 words - 5 pages interrogation as proof of recollection still remains problematic. What is being called into question is the method of interrogation that Socrates uses to help the salve boy recollect. Is the slave-boy actually recollecting forgotten knowledge? Or is Socrates asking strategic questions that direct the slave boy to the correct answer? It is assumed that because Socrates is asking questions and not explicitly teaching the slave boy anything that he has to