Socrates' Last Error Essay

3144 words - 13 pages

Socrates' Last Error

In the dialogue, Crito, Socrates justified his decision to accept his death penalty. His decision was praised as principled and just. However, such a view was one of the greatest myths in the history of philosophy. Contrary to the accepted ideas, I wish to show that Socrates’ argument was erroneous, the crucial error being his failure to distinguish between substantial and procedural justice. In fact, the whole of the Crito refers to some deeper problems of the philosophy of law and morality.

The dialogue "Crito" recounts Socrates' last days, immediately before his execution. As the text reveals, his friend Crito proposes to Socrates that he escape from prison. In a dialogue with Crito, Socrates considers the proposal, trying to establish whether an act like that would be just and morally justified. Eventually, he came to argue that by rejecting his sentence and by trying to escape from prison he would commit unjust and morally unjustified acts. Therefore, he decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Because of his decision, he became one of the cult figures in the history of philosophy, a man of intact moral integrity who had made his final decision according to the very same principles that guided his entire life. He was praised as a grand rationalist who had acted rationally and justly—a view which, I believe, represents one of the greatest myths in the history of philosophy.

Contrary to this widely accepted myth, I will try to demonstrate that Socrates' argument was erroneous, which made his decision less rational. In fact, had he decided to escape, his behavior would not have represented an unjust act. Although his argumentation and dialogue with Crito seem more like a moral sermon, his ideas are based on some deeper philosophical problems. In fact, Socrates' argument, developed in "Crito," belongs to the domain of the philosophy of law and morality. The argument can be summarized in the following way:

1. Lawbreaking is unjust, while observance of laws is just, because
2. Laws are just.
3. The laws of Athens are just, even if the legitimacy of laws in general can be questioned.
4. Judicial decisions made on the basis of those laws are just.
5. When finally pronounced, judicial decisions must be carried out.
6. Disrespect of judicial decisions produces the destruction of laws.

Conclusion: Escape from prison is an unjust and therefore morally unacceptable act.

The conclusion that Socrates drew from the premises is sound only if the premises themselves are true, and that is why their soundness must be examined first.

ad 1. The first premise cannot be questioned, because its truth seems incontestable. However, this is true only insofar as the first premise is related to the second one. It is assumed that the second premise ("Laws are just") is correct. Indeed, respect of unjust laws must be morally doubtful, which means that the claim for their observance must be based on some other,...

Find Another Essay On Socrates' Last Error

Characterise and assess Plato's theory of forms/essences in the first half of the Phaedo (up to 95e).

2848 words - 11 pages Plato's TombEAGLE! Why soarest thou above that tomb?To what sublime and star-ypaven homeFloatest thou? -I am the image of swift Plato's spirit,Ascending heaven; Athens doth inheritHis corpse below.P. B. Shelley. (1)Plato's Phaedo is a work that stands proud amongst the great works of Greek literature. The serenity of Socrates as he spends his last few hours before he drinks the hemlock is admirable. The theme of friendship is deeply moving. Even

Interpretation of Love in Plato’s Symposium

2199 words - 9 pages one body had two people who were eventually split in half by Zeus. This is meant to explain why people are constantly looking for their “other half”. Moreover Agathon, the poet the symposium is celebrating, critiques the previous speakers by stating that they failed to praise the god of love. He claims that love rejects feebleness and embraces youthfulness while also implying that love creates justice, courage and wisdom. The last person to

J.S. Mill's "On Liberty".

1475 words - 6 pages . Mill is why no one can be justified in silencing opinion. (On Liberty, pg.77) "Those who desire to suppress it (opinion), of course, deny its truth; but they are not infallible." Although someone might say another's opinion is wrong they are still capable of error and therefore the opinion may in fact be right. To deny the hearing of an opinion is to assume that one's opinion is absolutely right and that they are infallible. Humans are fallible

God and The Good Itself

3100 words - 12 pages (1082).Nietzsche believes that all philosophers believe that life "is good for nothing" (1080). Since they appeal to a greater truth, they reject what is really real (1083). It is because of their decadence that they reject their instincts (1082). They have overdeveloped their logical reasoning rather than rely on something that is present in every human being (1081). Socrates' error was that he believed in "rationality at all costs" (1082). "To

Oedipus rex by Sophocles.

3002 words - 12 pages a respectable and plausible hero by giving Oedipus many of the popular sentiments of the time. These ideals were brought about by a philosophy that was thriving in Greece during Sophocles' lifetime. Most of Oedipus' notions, can be traced back to either the dialectic Socrates in who appeared in Plato's several works, or Plato's student Aristotle. These notions were being circulated throughout Greece during the time period which Oedipus was

The Enlightenment Torn Apart

1573 words - 6 pages scrutinized. They did this through science and other forms of art, two things, which according to Rousseau are no way of finding virtue. Of course when applying the sciences there are certain outcomes and answers to certain problems. One thing many forget is the possibility of error. According to Rousseau, error is a huge problem when dealing with the sciences. In his First Discourse Rousseau states, "What false paths when investigating the

Information and Knowledge

1738 words - 7 pages assassinated before he leaves office later this year. That does not mean that I have knowledge of this event; it was just a lucky guess (if it came to be). An ancient greek philosopher I am sure you are all familiar with, Socrates, once stated that true belief has to have "an account" or a justification for the belief in order for that "true" belief to become knowledge (or fact). This theory is the Justified-True-Belief theory of knowledge, let's

Descartes & John Locke

2345 words - 9 pages The Move from Doubt to Certainty; A Look at the Theories of Descartes and Locke Descartes is interested in the certainty of his existence and the existence of other people and things. Descartes' beliefs vary from those of Socrates. Descartes argues that knowledge is acquired through awareness and experience. Using this approach, Descartes moves through doubt to certainty of his existence. He asks himself various questions about the certainty of

Philosophy Overview

10212 words - 41 pages , experience, observation, proof. Method is deduction.Irrationalism - individual knowledge there is no method of mystical experience, e.g. mysticism- close to poetry.2.The idea of philosophy: love of wisdom and contemplation of the divine order (philosophia, theoria, kosmos, chaos and nous). Philosophy according to Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle.Philosophy from an etymological point of view is the love of wisdom (from Greek phileo [I

Saint Augustine And Michel De Montaigne's Approach To A Multficated Universe And Inner Nirvana

2185 words - 9 pages argues that to truly give an accurate account of a subject it would need to be studied at all moments in time under different circumstances. Since it is impossible for philosophers and theologians to observe all of reality at all time moments in time, it is impossible for them to give comprehensive accounts of any phenomena.In fact, Montaigne writes that were it not for this last issue "I (Montaigne) should not be making essays, but coming to

Creation and Augustine vs. Evolution and Charles Darwin

1400 words - 6 pages with one another, they maybe come up with a more concrete theory and possibly prove how the world was started. After researching I personally think that parts of evolution and creationism can be true. However for the last seventeen years of my life I have attended private Christian schools, and my belief is that God did in fact create the heavens, earth, and man, all things change because of complex systems. Works Cited • Sarri, Samuel, et al. “SOCRATES to Sartre and BEYOND,” United States of America. 2007 print. • Takahasi, Yuki. “Big Bang: How Did the Universe Begin?” Spring 2000

Similar Essays

The Apology Of Socrates: Guilty Or Innocent?

954 words - 4 pages wise.  Socrates says,  "...and this is what will cause my condemnation if I am condemned;  not Meletus of Antyus either, but that prejudice and resentment of the multitude which have been the destruction of many good men before me, and I think will be so again.  There is no prospect that I shall be the last victim" (34).  Socrates implies that the true nature of this charge was, in fact, vengeance carried out on the part of the power

Socrates Versus Nelson Mandela Essay

1785 words - 7 pages placed on trial and put to death soon after because of the disapproval of his ideas. Even with the anticipation of death linguring in his path, Socrates remained composed and curious. During his defense, he made it clear that death was nothing to fear, but rather an accepted inevitability of life. “Those of us who think that death is an evil are in error”(Plato, 39). Instead of viewing his sentence as a burden, Socrates regarded it as a

Government Essay

1154 words - 5 pages works well for Socrates, so he sticks with it. In this, Socrates discusses the natural errors every human is liable to make. Thrasymachus, of course, agrees that every human makes errors, and that yes, every tyrant is human, therefore they are inclined to make errors, and yes, they may by error make unjust laws that the citizens follow. Therefore these citizens in order to be just, must follow laws that are unjust to the tyrant which is than not the

Plato's Writings Essay

2410 words - 10 pages never intended. But this strategy works well for Socrates, so he sticks with it. In this, Socrates discusses the natural errors every human is liable to make. Thrasymachus, of course, agrees that every human makes errors, and that yes, every tyrant is human, therefore they are inclined to make errors, and yes, they may by error make unjust laws that the citizens follow. Therefore these citizens in order to be just, must follow laws that are