This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Socrates Law Vs. Morality Essay

1438 words - 6 pages

Introduction
This essay will be discussing the distinction between the duty to obey the law and morals taking into consideration the trial of socrates within which this essay will be using as a vehicle to analyse the jurisprudential question as to why in a very modern constitutional democracy the citizen has a duty to obey the law.
Socrates-Law vs Morality
The trial of Socrates suggests that there are three possible bases for an ethical obligation to obey the law. First and foremost a citizen might have agreed to the law, that is, we might find that an express or implied agreement to conform exists. Secondly, short of an implied agreement, his own actions might stop him to decline, if the term were used in a legal sense the argument would in fact be redundant. Thirdly, absent any assent or action by the citizen himself, he might simply are the recipient of advantages presented by alternative citizens and so arguably ought to have associate obligation to conform the laws enacted by those citizens. Logically, these three prospects appear to exhaust the vary of sources of obligation.
Laws are the body of rules that are recognized as binding among folks of a community or state in order that they will be obligatory upon them and enforced on them by applicable sanctions are referred to as laws. Morals are beliefs and values which are shared by a society or a region of a society. These tell those who share them what's right or wrong. problems in identifying the ethical values of a society is that Some folks sometimes regard things as morally right or wrong that at over again or in another place are thought to be matters of taste or indeed to be matters of no importance at all.
Moral attitudes tend to alter overtime as an example homosexuality and woman's liberation. in a fashionable developed society it is tough to pinpoint a set of moral values shared by all. Some tribal groups are likely to share a moral code however in a society like our own wherever individuals defer widely in social status, income, occupation and ethnicity, the members are unlikely to share identical moral values although they largely agree on some basic points.
Legal Positivism and its effects on Conscientious objection
Positivism simply implies that the law are some things that is "posited": laws are genuinely created in accordance with socially accepted rules. The positivist view on law can be seen to cover two broad principles: firstly, that laws might seek to enforce justice, morality, or the other normative end, however their success or failure in doing so does not determine their validity. Provided a law is properly formed, in accordance with the rules recognized within the society concerned, it is a legitimate law, no matter whether it is simply by some other customary. Secondly, that law is nothing more than a group of rules to provide order and governance of society. No legal positivist, however, argues that it follows that the law is thus to be obeyed.
Central to those...

Find Another Essay On Socrates Law vs. Morality

A Hoax in Court Essay

1551 words - 6 pages Albert Einstein quoted, “In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same.” (Brainy Quote) Was there truth and justice in the trial of Socrates? First, what is justice? According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of justice is the administration of law, especially the establishment or determination of rights according to the

The Complicated Life of Socrates Essay

1411 words - 6 pages looks and proper bearing were important to a man's political prospects, for beauty and goodness were linked in the popular imagination” (Nails). No man would desire poverty or a complicated lifestyle. As of virtue, a man’s morality is depended upon virtue. Socrates divided virtue into two categories: vulgar virtue and true virtue. Vulgar virtue is explained as conduct; the way a man should behave in society. True virtue is explained as personal

Greek Society vs. Socrates

1302 words - 5 pages Greek Society vs. Socrates What make a man virtuous? Throughout many texts of Greek society the picture of a perfect man is painted and apparent. This man, the “perfect man”, is the virtuous Greek citizen. Who is virtuous not only in the eyes of society, but also at home, in war, and in his relationship to the God(s). Also in Greek society, there was a man named Socrates who’s opinion differed with his culture’s thoughts, and he

Socrates and Thrasymachus in Republic

2195 words - 9 pages government”. (Republic 339c) He affirms that, “subjects must act in accordance with any law that is passed, and… this constitutes doing right”. (Republic 339c) In defining ‘right’ and ‘moral’ on such grounds, it is clear that he holds a radically different view than Socrates. Socrates’ rebuttal cites that Thrasymachus’ claim is inconsistent. Socrates claims that morality is not necessarily the advantage of the stronger party as Thrasymachus

Importance of Philosophers

1525 words - 7 pages PHILOSOPHY OF SOCRATES. (May 01, 1969). Philosophical Books, 10, 2, 10-11. Stahl, B. C. (January 01, 2004). Ethics and Morality. Marquez, X. (March 01, 2011). Knowledge and Law in Plato's Statesman and Laws: A Response to Klosko. Political Studies, 59, 1, 188-203.

The Observant, Thoughtful, and Acute Nature of Socrates

1086 words - 5 pages qualities of the highest order; humility, sincerity and courage, which are high above the mental alertness that anyone can possess. Socrates was a true philosopher who defended his principles of morality despite the punishment. Socrates argued that, naturally, a man who had devoted the entire life to philosophy should be cheerful even in the face of death (Jun 34). Furthermore, the man should be confident of finding the blessing in the next

Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates

1231 words - 5 pages Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates Upon reading Plato, The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates strongly held views on the relationship between morality and laws become apparent to the reader. Equally, Socrates makes clear why laws should be followed and why disobedience to the law is rarely justified. Finally, he makes clear his views regarding civil disobedience. Socrates’ view on morality is that anyone can do wrong

Our Duty to Obey the Law

1038 words - 5 pages (Aquinas) instilled through evolution and social conduct in the world around the possessor.(LAW VS MORALITY PG.231) It is important to note that these intrinsic rules are not created by man, but are found within as a result of internal factors. In agreement with Hart such an internal factor may be the instinct to survive, based on the truism that all humans want to survive. Further external factors such as the higher powers of religion that embed

Justice as Portrayed in Crito

3227 words - 13 pages escapes imprisonment and thus breaks a law, he would be straying from the path of the good life and would be harming the city and its communities within it. After all, the city is made up of citizens and their morality is the morality of the city because the attributes of the city must arise from the people, as expounded in Book IV of the Republic. Harming the city would, therefore, be unjust.Moreover, Socrates has two options: either he persuades

The Republic by Plato

2082 words - 8 pages empirical facts of many corrupted governments. Both of Socrates’ counter arguments fail to challenge the empirical facts behind the “Might makes right” argument. He could have pointed out the difference between a legal ought and a moral ought. Rulers can only make people believe that the law is the same as morality, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that the law actually is morality. Works Cited Plato. 1941. Republic of Plato, translated by

law and morality

1497 words - 6 pages Introduction The jurisprudential question as to whether in a modern constitutional democracy citizens have a duty to obey the law regardless of whether the content of the law is morally just or not has been central to many theorists. Natural law theorists advocate that laws should only be obeyed if they are in line with morality. Conversely, Positivists argue law has the status of law if a recognized ‘Human’ authority makes it in the accepted

Similar Essays

Comparison Of Socrates And Siddhartha Guatama Buddha

896 words - 4 pages enlightenment in life. Buddha relinquishes the same ideas, but in hopes of living an enlightened life on earth. (The Dhammapada: Socrates & Buddha Vs. Desire) My contention is to compare Philosopher Socrates from Plato and Siddhartha Guatama Buddha, and I will demonstrate their similarities and differences based on their practices and beliefs. Buddha Siddhartha Gautama is the historical founder of Buddhism, and naturally his name expresses numerous

Socrates Sides With Creon Or A

1487 words - 6 pages Socrates' Sides With? Through my reading of Plato's Apology of Socrates and Crito, I have been able to see how Socrates makes important decisions and what he primarily bases his decisions on. As a individual person we have individual morals which lead us to our own moral or immoral decisions. Sometimes are own morals or beliefs might oppose the views of the state or the enforced law that clams to find justice. In this case we rely on our own

A Hoax In Court: The Trial Of Socrates

1726 words - 7 pages Albert Einstein quoted, “In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same” (Brainy Quote). Were justice and truth a part of Socrates’ trial? The primary question is: what is justice? According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of justice is: “the administration of law, especially the establishment or determination of rights

Unaborted Socrates Essay

1754 words - 8 pages because nobody knows whether the fetus is a human being or not is a completely valid argument. Socrates showed this to Herrod and they ended their debate with Herrod saying that he was not knowledgeable enough to answer the question. Socrates next debate was with the philosopher, Tarrian . The main question they set out to answer was whether morality should be legislated. This debate went much like the previous one Socrates had with Herrod. It