Socrates’ Trial Defense In Terms Of His Values

1472 words - 6 pages

Socrates’ Trial Defense in Terms of His Values

In his Apology, Plato recounted the trial that led to the execution of his friend and mentor, Socrates. The account revealed that values of Socrates’ accusers and his own fundamentally differed, and that they had been angered because he tried to prove that they had misplaced theirs. Those differences created conflict between the two parties that culminated in his trial. With the understanding that a jury condemned Socrates to death and his defense nevertheless pleased him because he gave it truthfully, it is most sensible to call it a good defense because he felt it was the best that he could do.

In reply to the first charge against him, Socrates effectively recounted the reason that he had been privately questioning Athenians and claiming that some of their personal beliefs had been ill-founded. The affidavit read, “Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others.” (Plato, 2) The abstractness of that accusation made it an odd one to refute, so Socrates attempted to do so by explaining how he became unpopular with his accusers.

Socrates established very early in his defense that he knew he had no wisdom, and he based his investigations of Athenians’ wisdom on finding at least one person wiser than he was. He recalled a story of Chaerephon, an old Athenian friend, who went to the Oracle of Delphi to ask whether anybody had more wisdom than Socrates did, and she “’…answered that there was no man wiser.’” (Plato, 3) Socrates explained that since he knew he had no wisdom, he began a search to find a man wiser than himself so that he could prove the oracle wrong. His questioning of Athenians during the search, however, generated an unpopular opinion of him among many.

Had people believed that Socrates in fact had no wisdom, his reputation would not have become so bad and his defense would have been more likely to succeed. He explained, however that individuals whom he criticized took offense at him and grew angry because they felt that he had more wisdom than they did. “’…I am called wise, for my hearers always imagine that I myself possess the wisdom which I find wanting in others: but the truth is, O men of Athens, that God only is wise; and in this oracle he means to say that the wisdom of men is little or nothing…’” (Plato, 5) While that statement would not have convinced many people that Socrates lacked wisdom, it succeeded at presenting the idea that the oracle meant the wisdom of people is little or nothing. That likely benefited him among his supporters and some neutral jurors because they could have believed that Socrates’ mission had been to show that people lacked wisdom compared to gods rather than that he had more wisdom than others did. Among people who disliked him or who took pride in...

Find Another Essay On Socrates’ Trial Defense in Terms of His Values

A Hoax in Court: The Trial of Socrates

1726 words - 7 pages according to the rules of law or equity.” Meletus brought an elder man to court for corrupting the youth and for refusing to believe in the gods of the city. 501 Athenian male residents observed as the jury to magistrate and center their decisions off Meletus’s accusations and Socrates’ defense to pronounce Socrates as guilty. Who is to declare that a trial has gone through the correct procedure to fully come to a judgment of guilty or innocent

Erroneus Assumptions in The Trial and Death of Socrates

2336 words - 9 pages Erroneus Assumptions in The Trial and Death of Socrates In Plato's Crito, Socrates explains to his old friend Crito his reasons for refusing an offer to help him escape execution. One of the tools Socrates uses to convince Crito of the righteousness of his decision is a hypothetical argument concerning the state and laws of Athens. Central to this argument is the congeniality that Socrates had always found in Athens, reflected by the fact

Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates

1231 words - 5 pages Morality and Laws in The Trial and Death of Socrates Upon reading Plato, The Trial and Death of Socrates, Socrates strongly held views on the relationship between morality and laws become apparent to the reader. Equally, Socrates makes clear why laws should be followed and why disobedience to the law is rarely justified. Finally, he makes clear his views regarding civil disobedience. Socrates’ view on morality is that anyone can do wrong

The Trial and Death of Socrates

1656 words - 7 pages The portrayal of Socrates, through the book “the trial and death of Socrates” is one that has created a fairly controversial character in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the idea of common philosophy in ancient Greece; he transformed their view on philosophy from a study of why the way things are, into a consideration man. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul. Along side commending Socrates for his

The Trial and Death of Socrates

1017 words - 4 pages Socratic Method had come about. With Socrates’ pedagogy, a series of questions can be asked not only to draw individual answers, but also to persuade deep-seated insights into the real issues at hand. His result remains a frequently used tool in a broad series of discussions. The trial of Socrates was based on two disreputable and indistinct charges that were found to be disliked by the Greek culture; corrupting the youth and impiety. To be more

Ginzburg on Trial: An Argument in Defense of Historian Carlo Ginzburg

1574 words - 7 pages centered on a curious sixteenth century miller named Menocchio and his interactions with the Inquisitorial board while on trial for heresy. Ginzburg, however, intends to do more than just tell the story of a miller’s trial and subsequent execution under the inquisition. Ginzburg scrutinizes, evaluates, and researches the details of Menocchio’s statements in an attempt to understand the origins of his strange worldview. Ginzburg then asserts that by

In Defense Of Food

1254 words - 5 pages was great. My grandpa has a nice sized plot of land where they would grow an assortment of fruits and vegetables. Walking up to a tree and picking a fresh orange off of it was always refreshing. No additives or pesticides were ever used of course, and you can taste it. There was nothing but hard work put into his trees and plants and it reflected in the food we would eat. Fresh carrots, onions, lettuce, tomatoes, the list goes on and on. We

In Defense of Consumerism

696 words - 3 pages student demands and interests is noticed also by William A. Henry III. He believes that there is an injustice in knowingly training students for jobs and careers that may never be available to them. As student interest increases, colleges offer more degree programs to meet demand, even if there is an oversupply in the marketplace. As he states in his essay, In Defense of Elitism, '…colleges blithely go on "educating" more prospective

In Defense Of Abortion

1639 words - 7 pages For hundreds of years women helped each other to abort their pregnancies. Without legal prohibitions, women in Europe and the United States provided abortions and trained each other to perform the procedures. In the past century different states had begun to outlaw any procedure that would terminate or avoid pregnancy. In 1973(?) the United States Supreme Court asserted a woman's constitutional right to abortion in determining Roe v. Wade

By What Means Does Calderón Structure His Play in Terms of Action, Text and Spectacle?

1946 words - 8 pages approaches his wife in slumber and moves a curtain to see her. Furthermore, the use of the curtain portrayed the darkness which was so crucial to the play. The essential element of drama from the Golden Age was the rudimentary nature of the staging which controlled the stricture of the play. Consequently, the language, which is used to create atmosphere and describe action, becomes of vital importance affecting the audience's interpretation

Plato's "trial and death of socrates", Explains socrates view of self-examination (meditation) as the path to knowledge.

897 words - 4 pages fact they did not know it. This gave Socrates an important advantage over the other men in Athens. How can someone know the truth and gain mass amounts of knowledge if that person doesn't know and have great knowledge of his or herself.Socrates analyzed everything including his own knowledge and actions. Socrates realized that wisdom can be obtained by self-examination and by speaking the philosophical language. He spoke the philosophical language

Similar Essays

The Trial Of Socrates Essay

1100 words - 4 pages The Trial of Socrates The trial of Socrates is an excellent source of events during the period in which Socrates lived and died. Athens was a democratic city with much pride in their freedom. Especially their freedom of speech. Socrates was a political philosopher who did not agree with these freedoms provided by the Athenic democracy. However, it is his trial in which both the democracy of Athens and Socrates himself show their

The Trial Of Socrates Essay

1918 words - 8 pages by his principles." Perhaps another reason he held back from the free speech line of defense is because a victory would have been a victory for the democratic principles he scorned. An acquittal would have vindicated Athens.In an Athenian criminal trial, the jury voted twice. The first vote was on conviction or acquittal, if found guilty it voted again on the penalty. Socrates, who spoke little in his own defense during the first phase of his

Defense Of Socrates Essay

1579 words - 6 pages Defense of Socrates There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s

The Trial Of Socrates Essay

983 words - 4 pages Socrates was accused of being a sophist because he was "engaging in inquiries into things beneath the earth and in the heavens, of making the weaker argument appear the stronger," and "teaching others these same things." (Apology, Plato, Philosophic Classics page 21) Socrates is also accused of denying the existence of the gods, and corrupting the youth. Socrates goes about trying to prove his innocence. The jury that Socrates was tried by