Something On Kant Essay

1389 words - 6 pages

"Act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for the whole world" (Immanuel Kant). Many philosophers have many different theories to idea of ethics and what exactly we as humans have the rights to. In both the Kant and ethics to rights chapter they share the similarities of absolute rights and humans ability of free choice and conversely see humans right for needs, positive and negative rights, and Kants clash with utilitarianism.One characteristic the two theories hold in common is the idea of equality towards mankind and the universal law of an absolute right. In the ethics of rights chapter, one of the rights that Hinman explains we are all entitled to is an absolute right, "the right to life, for example, may be an absolute right" (208). An absolute right gives no one the justification of killing someone else for any reason. Even though there are many examples where government and social groups are at fault with breaking the absolute right, we need to acknowledge that every human has the right to life. "Many theorists…claiming that people have certain fundamental rights even if their government and society fail to acknowledge those rights" (209). For example, the Nazi's victimized many Jews, Poles, and Russians. While it was legal for the Nazi's to oppress these groups, it did not make it right. Kant also agrees with the theory of absolute and natural rights. Kant's theory of categorical imperative states, "Always act in such a way that you can will that the maxim behind your action be adopted as a universal law" (182). In layman's terms, he is saying live your life in a way that your ethics are unconditional and universal. That is why he would agree with the theory of absolute rights, because the maxim of an absolute right is life. Kant will also make an exception in such situations as the corrupt governments. "It is permissible to lie to government authorities in order to protect an innocent person's life or well-being from those authorities when those authorities…have shown abuse" (185). In this maxim, he formulates a rule that will make it just for someone to protect a life against unjust groups, even if the only solution is to lie.A further similarity is that of human nature and free choice. We as humans have the duty to act in away that is free of emotions, and "act for the sake of duty" (177). When we act for the sake of duty, we act in a way that encourages our morality, rather than acting in way for self achievement. In the Kant chapter there is an example of a grocer, which it is his duty to be honest with his customers. Kant, on the other hand sees it more than being honest. In order for the grocer to act for the sake of duty, he has to put behind the idea of benefiting his store and do it for the sake of honesty. "The act is done just because it is the right thing to do; in other words, it is done for the sake of duty" (177). This concurs with the ethics of rights chapter in a sense that acting for...

Find Another Essay On Something on Kant

Book Report on Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals by Kant

846 words - 3 pages on to state that any "empirical evidence of a moral law is highly prejudice to the purity of the moral law" (43) Kant next introduces the idea of the "Kingdom of Ends" (50) Stated simply, humans are members of a kingdom that is governed by one law which encourages them to treat themselves and others as "ends in themselves" (50). In the kingdom everything either has value or dignity (51). Something with value can be replaced by anything else

Immanuel Kant: A Philosopher Who Influenced Society

1018 words - 4 pages One of the philosophers that impact society is Immanuel Kant; he was a philosopher in the 18th century. Immanuel Kant was born in April 22, 1724 in Kingdom of Prussia, German and died on February 12, 1804 at age 79. Philosopher Immanuel Kant composed different point of views to courage that we understand the world better. Kant is trying to tell us that there are many things that evolve around this world and that every little single element

Hume Vs Kant

1732 words - 7 pages the idea of the effect.” (87) Since we are trained to expect the impression of necessary connection, the idea of it comes from our minds. Therefore, our belief in necessary connections of the universe is based on a rational facts.      Immanuel Kant, a philosopher after Hume, sets out to reform metaphysics. Kant believed that if Hume was right, metaphysics would be impossible. But, Kant was unwilling to surrender to Hume’s skeptical argument, so

The Beauty of Works of Art

1404 words - 6 pages Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Judgment aims to analyze the notion of a judgment of beauty or a judgment of taste. There is a basic dichotomy between two opposed sets of features that Kant explores through his various characterizations of judgments of beauty. On one hand, judgments of beauty are based on feeling (the object is not subsumed under the concept of a purpose that it is supposed to satisfy). On the other hand however, judgments of beauty

Comparing Hegel and Kant's Views on Reason

537 words - 2 pages Comparing Hegel and Kant's Views on Reason That "the idea pays the ransom of existence and transience—not out of its own pocket, but with the passions of individuals" is an idea with categorizes what Hegel calls "the Cunning of Reason" (35). It is in this way that Hegel describes universal Reason, a force which ensures the end of history in its own self-consciousness. Like Kant, Hegel develops a teleological history which moves toward a

Kant on the Locus of the Moral Worth and Utility

930 words - 4 pages admits that the goodwill can only be good if it is willing. According to Kantian Ethics: Good Will, It is Your Duty! Kant’s ethics moral are based on the unconditional command referred to as the Categorical Imperative. Therefore, Kant states that doing something because it creates a positive feeling of doing it does not make the action good. What matters is the attitude that one builds in doing the job. Kant claims that doing something out of

Comparing David Hume and Immanuel Kant

1386 words - 6 pages to achieve something; then you ought to do a specific action to achieve the predetermined goal. Kant felt that this was an action based on a condition or purpose and had no moral worth. Kant believed that moral worth requires action without the conditional purpose, and felt this could be found in the form of the categorical imperative or unconditional law that applies to all which requires you to just perform the action regardless of the end. In


1274 words - 6 pages implies that there is something wrong with slavery. On the other hand, political moralist are realists who worry about having a balance in power when ruling over others. They think about prosperity. They only use morality when it suits their purpose for personal or national goals (Kant, p. 164). Kant himself thinks about doing what is right, but realistically speaking he knows this can’t always be the case since one can’t always calculate what they

Kant's Perspective on Crime, Punishment, and Justice

1818 words - 7 pages Punishment is the suffering, pain, or loss that serves at retribution. Others also say it is “the authoritative imposition of something unpleasant on a person in response to a behavior deemed to be wrong by an individual or group” (Hugo & McAnany, 2010). Some question when and why we should punish. Though easy to state, this question is difficult to answer and has lead to a variety of models of punishment. In Kant’s article Metaphysics of Morals

Exploration of Deontological Ethics

1289 words - 5 pages that the consequences of an action determine its moral worth. Kant’s theory is deontological because it’s based on duty. To act morally is to do one’s duty, and one’s duty is to obey the moral law. Kant argued that we should not be side-tracked by feeling and inclination. We should not act out of love and compassion, and he also adds that it is not our duty to things that we are unable to do. For Kant, moral statements are

Comparing Kant and Mill

915 words - 4 pages ultimately mean to attain. Mill’s path toward certainty and understanding is dependent on dissenting opinion, and is asymptotic to truth; one never achieves the complete enlightenment that Kant describes so vividly as the individual’s end on a linear path of reason. Kant’s description of enlightenment describes the escape from one’s “self-imposed immaturity.” This immaturity, according to Kant, is “self imposed when its cause lies not in lack of

Similar Essays

Kant’s Antidote To Idealism Essay

1230 words - 5 pages (something for future philosophers to tackle), but it does not unconditionally nullify Kant’s doctrines. In conclusion, with his doctrine of transcendental idealism, Kant was able to establish that our cognition of external objects is dependent on our a priori intuitions of space and time. We bring this “space in thought” to external objects and give them form, creating the appearances of them that lead to empirical knowledge. Even though we can only

Immanuel Kant Essay

1773 words - 7 pages Western philosophy, has been celebrated for his great contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics. Kant especially celebrates the originality and uniqueness of his ethical theory through his general criticism of previous ethical theories and has always been regarded as a profound impact on more or less all the philosophical movements that went behind him. Significantly, Kant's philosophy is anchored in his conviction

What Is Enlightenment? Emmanuel Kant Essay

1317 words - 5 pages not agree that they have to live without rules, regulations or a government. In his essay Kant says “. If I have a book to serve as my understanding, a pastor to serve as my conscience, a physician to determine my diet for me, and so on, I need not exert myself at all. I need not think, if only I can pay: others will readily undertake the irksome work for me.”(Kant, 1). Kant believes that these guardians restrain our minds and have us lack the

The Intentions And Consequences Of An Action

1336 words - 6 pages , Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals is an instruction manual that describes how a rational person ought to act. The first thing to remember is that actions are important when discussing the works of Kant because he not only places more emphasis on intentions than consequences, but he also believes that it is the person’s character that determines the rightness of any action. As a matter of fact, Kant was more interested in the actions