St. Anselm Essay

1610 words - 6 pages

St. Anselm


Not every great writer can be correct in what he or she is saying. This is the idea that Gaunilo had in mind when he wrote his criticism to St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument which states that if something greater than anything else that could be thought of is conceived in the understanding then it must exist. Gaunilo says it is foolish to believe in the existence of something just because it is understood. He says there must be some kind of other explanation. In this paper, I will try to explain both Anselm’s theory and Gaunilo’s argument by first breaking each of them down in simpler terms. I will attempt to show what Gaunilo is trying to discredit with his objection.
One of St. Anselm’s theological topics deals with the Ontological Argument in which discusses the idea of existence. He gives a definition of God as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived” (69). His idea being that God is the ultimate being or “the greatest possible being” (68). He says there is nothing anyone can possibly imagine that could be better than Him. This argument gives God the highest human qualities possible. He is omnipotent as well as omniscient. Anselm suggests that there is no one or nothing in this world that is greater than God is (69). This perfection that God possesses leads into the fact that He must exist. He is trying to create the idea that God exists and nothing can be better than he can be. However, one must ask where Anselm gets his proof. What evidence does he have to back up his argument?
If nothing greater than God can be conceived in anyone’s understanding, God is said to be humanly perfect. Since to be perfect, in part, is to exist; something that does not exist cannot be perfect. Something that exists has to be better than something that does not exist simply because it is here. If a child imagines the greatest toy he can think of and then is able to play with it, it has to be better than just the image of the toy in the child’s mind. He can feel it and hold it and play with this perfect thing that nothing, in his eyes, can beat. He says it is perfect and part of that perfection comes from the fact that he can play with his creation. If God is perfect in human terms then he must exist, because if he did not then one can imagine something greater that does. What Anselm is saying is that God is perfect, to be perfect is to exist; therefore, God exists.
Anselm uses an analogy of a fool to try and display what is meant by his idea. First, he says, “Truly there is a God, although the fool hath said in his heart, There is no God” (68). The fool is questioning whether or not God exists. He understands what God is, and he knows that God is the greatest being that can be conceived. He understands that this being known as God possesses every human perfection possible. This then, puts God into his understanding or rather, into his mind just as the toy was in the mind of the child. ...

Find Another Essay On St. Anselm

Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

1211 words - 5 pages the Western World. New York, Harper Collins Co., 1992. Pg. 81-86. John Hopkins: A Companion to the Study of St. Anselm. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972. Saint Anselm: Monologion. England, 1077. Saint Anselm: Proslogion. England, 1078.

Which Came First? Essay

1202 words - 5 pages areas, St. Anselm’s query encompasses a clearly defined answer. Recurrently, Anselm states that belief must come before understanding. He declares, “For I do not seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand. For this also I believe, - that unless I believed, I should not understand.” Thus, the question arises: Which comes first, belief or understanding? While many agree with the stance that Anselm takes of credo ut

Attempting to Prove God Through Reason

1761 words - 7 pages this is wrong, that scriptures must be used, and only the scriptures, to prove God. But how is that possible? One could not say that Hobbits are real because the book “The Hobbit” by J.R.R. Tolkin says that they are real. It is circular reasoning, which is illogical and flawed. So how would one go about proving God, without using the scriptures? Through reason. Which is precisely what St. Anselm set out to do. And he was not wrong to do so, rather

The Existence of God

736 words - 3 pages Saint Aquinas defines the existence of God with the upmost clarity. Saint Anselm and William Paley attempt to tackle the existence of God but are weighed down by weaknesses within their argument. Even with Saint Anselm being a Christian theologian, he does not incorporate his personal religious beliefs into his argument. St. Anselm relies purely on logic and ontology to define what he constitutes as God, defined as a being in which nothing

Exploring the Ontological Argument

2212 words - 9 pages those arguments, ontological arguments still provide a phenomenal vehicle for ontological discussion through St. Anselm’s original ideas and argument, objections raised, and revisions of previous arguments. The ontological argument still intrigues philosophers despite potential objections and flaws found in it. St. Anselm: The First Ontological Argument St. Anselm came up with the first and most well-known ontological argument (Oppy, 2012, para. 2

Anselms Ontological Argument And The Philosophers

1838 words - 7 pages ; St. Thomas Aquinas rejects the argument, saying that the human mind cannot possibly conceive of the idea of God by reason alone (a-priori), as Anselm might. The argument does not make sense by itself, and must first provide an idea of the existence of God with an analysis of God's effects (a- posteriori), to which Thomas turns. I think there is evidence in Anselm's writings that he would disagree, saying that the idea of God is an innate

Arguments for the Existence for God

1233 words - 5 pages and ask themselves the question of what caused these two? It is at this point where one is forced to admit that there is an “unmoved mover”, an independent being, and an uncaused cause who is called God. 3. Out of all three arguments for the existence only one of them is based on an a priori knowledge and it is the Ontological Argument. This argument is based on the knowledge that God does exist. In St. Anselm’s presentation of the

Explain Anselm’s version of the Ontological Argument for proving God’s existence and Gaunilo’s criticism

1033 words - 5 pages St Anselm’s argument was from a theistic stance, he had produced the Ontological Argument in a time period where the existence of God was a given. It was very rare to find atheists, therefore it may seem that the Ontological argument was used to convert atheists, it was a response to Psalms 14 and 15 which begins as “The Fool says to himself “there is no God”. However, the argument is actually from a “faith seeking understanding” view and only

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Ontological Argument - A Level - Information

1525 words - 7 pages deductive reasoning, so if the premises were correct then they would logically entail the conclusion. It is also analytic in its approach, because it is based upon the definitions of the terms used. The argument was first put forward in the 11th century by the philosopher Anselm of Canterbury, later being developed by Descartes. The argument is important in the philosophy of religion because it is still debated today, for instance in the modern

Explain the Development of the Ontological Argument

1313 words - 6 pages was based on the idea that we can prove the existence of God using our reason alone, therefore using a priori knowledge. According to the Ontological Argument, the definition of God is “that then which nothing greater can be conceived”. This is a logical tautology, meaning it is true by definition. The key figure that created this definition was St. Anselm of Canterbury whose essential claim was that “existence is a predicate of God”, which is

The Ontological Argument

3667 words - 15 pages says in his heart "There is no God"', this is the first line of Psalm 14 and St Anselm goes on to talk about the foolish man. He goes on to discuss the Ontological Argument more (though he didn't the argument this, we have over time). St Anselm says the foolish man is very foolish to arrive at such a conclusion as there is no because no intelligent man cannot conclude this because you are contradicting yourself.1) THE FOOLISH MAN MUST KNOW WHAT

Similar Essays

St. Anselm Essay

1976 words - 8 pages ... There was however a conflict during this time between people. One group believed the bible was to be talked about and not debated while the other group believed that the bible should be argued and discussed in order to better our understanding of it.One of the most influential in this respect was Saint Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109). Many of Saint Anselm's ideas have endured the test of time and are still influential to this day. Saint

Analyze And Discuss St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument

1235 words - 5 pages Ontological Argument.” Encountering the Real: Faith and Philosophical Enquiry. Saint Leo University Custom Text. New York: Cengage Learning, 2013. Print. Anselm, “The Ontological Argument.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontological_argument. Web. Oct. 22 2013 St. Anselm’s, “ontological argument for the existence of God.” http://www.youtube.com/watch. Web. Oct. 24 2013

St. Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay

561 words - 2 pages An ontological argument is an argument for the conclusion that God exists based on premises derived from rationale; an argument founded on reasoned, a priori premises. The first ontological argument was proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury in the 11th. Century A.D. Anselm claims to derive the existence of God from the concept of "something than which nothing greater can be conceived." (Anselm 78) He reasoned that, if such a being fails to exist

"The Ontological Argument": Explain The Traditional Forms Of The Ontological Argument Put Forward By Anselm And Descartes

1584 words - 6 pages a) Explain the traditional forms of the ontological argument put forward by Anselm and Descartes. (33 marks)The ontological argument is a deductive a priori argument that attempts to prove God's existence from logical reasoning. The first and best known ontological argument was proposed by St Anselm (Archbishop of Canterbury) in his writings 'Proslogion', however since then variations have been developed by other philosophers such as Rene