Stop And Frisk Essay

1885 words - 8 pages

Did you know that Institutions throughout NYC are legally violating Black and Hispanic citizens civil rights? These circumstances are the result of the NYPD’s attempt to protect the greater good of NYC; Stop and Frisk is the policy that attempts to accomplish this matter at hand. Stop and Frisk constantly targets Black and Hispanic citizens, therefore it does not promote a just and equitable society due to it viewing these ethnicities as more likely to commit a crime. The origin of Stop and Frisk traces back to the Supreme Court case of Terry V. Ohio, which took place in 1968. Terry, an experienced plainclothes officer, stopped and frisked three suspicious men; one produced a gun with no ...view middle of the document...

” (Tuttle). These cops are showing that those with power in the NYPD are using racial profiling, prejudice ideas, and stereotypes as a way to target victims of Stop and Frisk. Through these specific actions of the NYPD, many would agree that this is a form of institutional racism because the institution of the NYPD is denying minorities, Blacks and Hispanics, equal treatment from law enforcement. Though these stop and frisks might only result in just that, a stop and frisk, those that do result in arrests can have a negative impact on an individual by stripping them of their occupation or home. According to an article by CCR on Stop and Frisk, “In New York City it is not unusual for this process to take days, . . . Disappearing for several days can be enough to lose your job: ‘People actually lose their employment because they weren’t able to come into work’.” Several days may be too much for some people, according to the same article, “You have 48 hours to return to the shelter, then… [you] lose your place.” (Human Impact). By being taken away for a stop and frisk peoples lives are put on hold as they are under the control of the police from that point on; this results in everything they have being put on the line including their job and shelter. By police racially profiling and denying these people access to their housing and occupations, one can conclude that this is indeed a form of institutional racism. Both of these sources prove that the NYPD is promoting intuitional racism by carrying out Stop and Frisk. The NYPD, an institution, is implementing a policy, Stop and Frisk, which essentially has a negative effect on racial minorities because they are constantly targeted and treated unequally than everyone else who does not fit the criminal quota, which essentially denies them equal service from their police. Furthermore, when racial profiling does result in an arrest, minority’s access to jobs and shelter are at risk. These negative impacts on Blacks and Hispanics can essentially result in them losing faith in their police; this typically leads to disunity.
Stop and Frisk has led to a huge gap in the relationship between the NYPD and the Black and Hispanic community. This has resulted from cops specifically targeting Black and Hispanic neighborhoods or targeting Black and Hispanics in general, “Most stops occur in Black and Latino neighborhoods and Black and Latino people are significantly more likely to be stopped than White people, even in areas where populations are racially mixed or mostly White.” (Human Impact). This unjust way of targeting a specific ethnicity has resulted in disunity. According to an anonymous interview conducted on October 15th, 2013 at Penn Station NY, with a victim of Stop and Frisk who was a Black male, “This incident has made me feel degraded, and humiliated … it has changed my perspective of the police as now I view them as distrustful and racist; I wouldn’t trust them after this” (Personal Interview). This...

Find Another Essay On Stop And Frisk

Terry vs. Ohio – Stop Question and Frisk

912 words - 4 pages The Stop and Frisk program, set by Terry vs. Ohio, is presently executed by the New York Police Department and it grant police officers the ability to stop a person, ask them question and frisk if necessary. The ruling has been a NYPD instrument for a long time. However, recently it has produced a lot of controversy regarding the exasperating rate in which minorities, who regularly fell under assault and irritated by the police. The Stop

The Stop and Frisk Policy Analysis

1498 words - 6 pages Eighty-seven percent of stops in 2012, were Black and Hispanic people. Compare that percentage to the amount of water on Earth, only seventy percent. Now, imagine eighty-seven percent water covering the Earth. That would make the world unbalanced and difficult to live in, which is how life is for the minorities impacted by Stop and Frisk. One of the most debated and controversial topics in New York City is the Stop and Frisk policy, and the

Stop and Frisk/Racial Profiling Should Be Made Illegal

1653 words - 7 pages What is Stop and Frisk? The New York City stop-question-and-frisk program is a practice of the New York City Police Department by which police officers stop and question tens of thousands of pedestrians annually, and frisk them for weapons and other contraband (New York City Stop-question-frisk program). This program is said to keep weapons of the street but we are sure if their statements are accurate. Though the New York Police Department says

The Stop and Frisk Program within New York City Police Department

1848 words - 8 pages The New York City Police Department enacted a stop and frisk program was enacted to ensure the safety of pedestrians and the safety of the entire city. Stop and frisk is a practice which police officers stop and question hundreds of thousands of pedestrians annually, and frisk them for weapons and other contraband. Those who are found to be carrying any weapons or illegal substances are placed under arrest, taken to the station for booking

The New York Police Department’s Stop and Frisk Policy: A Time Series Analysis

3605 words - 14 pages INTRODUCTION At the core of the stop and frisk policy as utilized by the New York Police Department is racial profiling. Racial profiling has a significant and often controversial place in the history of policing in the United States. Racial profiling can be loosely defined as the use of race as a key determinant in law enforcement decisions to stop, interrogate, and/or detain citizens (Weitzer & Tuch, 2002). Laws in the United States have

Racial Profiling By Police Should Be Illegal

1729 words - 7 pages What is Stop and Frisk? The New York City stop-question-and-frisk program is a practice of the New York City Police Department by which police officers stop and question tens of thousands of pedestrians annually, and frisk them for weapons and other contraband (New York City Stop-question-frisk program). This program is said to keep weapons of the street but we are sure if their statements are accurate. Though the New York Police Department says

stop and frisks

805 words - 4 pages Stop and frisk is a procedure done by the new york police department that is made to stop crime before crime happens. The police stop thousands of pedestrians annually. If a law enforcement officer finds a pedestrian suspicious the officer can stop the pedestrian and conduct a stop and frisk. The procedure is a pat down of the outer garments while questioning the pedestrian. When police frisk the pedestrian they feel for weapons that may put

Reasonable Suspicious

1066 words - 5 pages pulled over a car with suspended insurance. The officer then wanted to question the occupants due to gang activity in the area. When police patted down Johnson, they found a weapon and marijuana. Of course, the traffic stop legalizes the stop and police had reasonable suspicion to frisk the occupants. In each of these cases, the fourth amendment right comes to mind. Frisks and searches are not the same according to the Terry v. Ohio case

Racial Profiling by Police Is Ineffective and Reduces Public Safety

1082 words - 4 pages “necessary to counter terrorism and reduce crime.” In my opinion, stop and frisk is unfair and against citizens constitutional rights therefore, making it illegal and horrible, but I do believe it’s a tactic taken by police to ensure no crimes are happening and it is also an effective way to counter terrorism. Everyone is created equally and should be treated equally. I believe Police should not stop someone based upon their race unless, suspicious

Temporary Questioning of Persons in Public Places: Search for Weapons

2481 words - 10 pages recently this past summer, August 2013, which the Supreme Court of New York City; on the case of Floyd v. New York City, 813 F.Supp.2d 457. The Supreme Court of New York City ruled that it was unconstitutional of the way it was being implicated, which ended the long term practice of Stop, Question and Frisk. The Fourth Amendment is to protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures without a warrant. The Fourteenth Amendment also

Post-WWII American Fault Lines: Race Is Still the Main Issue

1537 words - 6 pages were in danger of brutality and of death while they attempted to provide a basic civil right to people who were no less of citizens than their white counterparts. Racial profiling is a contemporary instance of the American preoccupation with racial difference. The policy of Stop-and-Frisk in major cities, such as New York and Newark, exemplifies racial profiling. The NYPD has free range over who they may stop, question, and frisk if they feel

Similar Essays

Stop Question And Frisk Essay

1131 words - 5 pages The stop, question and frisk policy is one of the most widely known controversy in the whole of New York City for the past years. Since its creation, the ongoing conflict between the New York Police Department and the citizens has never been resolved. There were several attempts to prevent the use of this policy, but all were unsuccessful. The main idea of this paper is to show how stop, question and frisk became a conflict between the New York

Stop And Frisk Essay

782 words - 4 pages On August 12th 2013, a New York City judge, Shira A. Scheindlin, ruled that the New York City Police Department’s (NYPD) policy, stop-and-frisk, is unconstitutional. Stop-and-frisk is a policy that allows police officers to stop people they deem suspicious. They are permitted to frisk them in search for illegal items such as weapons and/or drugs. Since Mayor Bloomberg introduced stop-and-frisk to the city it has been very controversial. The

Stop And Frisk Essay

3171 words - 13 pages Law Enforcement within urban communities has always been a difficult task for police. They are forced to deal with vastly different variables when trying to maintain order. The ability to identify who is a potential criminal is a daunting task for police. In order to assist these officials in their guest to stop a potential crime before it would happen, New York State adopted the “Stop and Frisk” law. This law was created in order to

What Is Stop And Frisk? Essay

1653 words - 7 pages What is Stop and Frisk? The New York City stop-question-and-frisk program is a practice of the New York City Police Department by which police officers stop and question tens of thousands of pedestrians annually, and frisk them for weapons and other contraband (New York City Stop-question-frisk program). This program is said to keep weapons of the street but we are sure if their statements are accurate. Though the New York Police Department says