Supreme Court Briefs Civil Liberties, Cases And The First Amendment Of The Usa

1672 words - 7 pages

Supreme Court Briefs - Civil Liberties

The First Amendment gives United States citizens five distinct rights. One of which gives citizens the freedom of assembly. This right gives the individual right to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue and defend the common interest. There has been many Supreme Court cases that have defined this freedom for every citizen and the United States government.
Edwards v. State of South Carolina
The court case, Edwards v. South Carolina, started oral arguments in December 1962. The case dealt with plaintiffs first amendment right, freedom of assembly. 187 peaceful protesters assembled in front of Zion Baptist ...view middle of the document...

Where the marchers freedom of assembly violated when they were arrested and convicted of breach of the peace?
In court Edwards argued the, peaceful, orderly protest was protected by every citizens first amendment right. He also argued, local police should not be able to decide what peaceful protest are permitted. Edwards felt that if local officials had this full power, the first amendment would only protect freedom of speech which which the local level allowed and there would be no protest of any kind. He finally stated that the convictions of all 187 should be overturned.
South Carolina argued that each state has the right to regulate protest to protect the publics safety. The protest was becoming disorderly and the onlookers were becoming unsettled and angry. Because of this, the police lawfully asked the marchers to disperse; if the police had not acted violence from the surrounding crowd would have occurred. Finally, the convictions should be upheld because the orders given to the marchers by the officers were lawful.
In an 8-1 decision the court overturned the convictions given by the prosecutors and upheld the right for citizens to demonstrate on public property. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the majority opinion. In it he made note that the protest had been peaceful and law-abiding. The law they were convicted upon had no distinct or clear definition, because of this it was used when the protestors expressed unpopular views. The evidence given did not support the claim that that the crowd had grown uneasy and could potently become violent.
As the only decanter Tom C. Clack wrote the decent. In it he stated the local law enforcement acted in a just manor. If there had only been a small group of protestors the police would not have acted. But, because of the size of the actual situation the police acted lawfully. If they hadn't violence could have broken out and a riot could have occurred. He finally stated that in arresting the marchers the police were protecting them from the surrounding crowd.

Dirk De Jonge v. State of Oregon
The court case, DeJonge v. Oregon, began oral arguments on December 9, 1936 and was decided upon on January 4, 1937. On July 27, 1934 around three hundred people assembled for a meeting presented by the Communist Party of Portland, Oregon. The main speaker was Dirk DeJonge, his intent was to rally supporters and gain members in the communist party. He also spoke out against police raids on party headquarters and police shootings of strikers. The police raided the meeting, taking party material and arresting Dirk DeJonge with three other communist meeting organizers. Dejong was charged with violating Oregon’s criminal syndicalism statue.
This staute stated, "the doctrine which advocates crime, physical violence, sabotage or any unlawful acts or methods as a means of accomplishing or effecting industrial or political change or revolution.”...

Find Another Essay On Supreme Court Briefs - Civil Liberties, Cases and the First Amendment of the USA

Argues in favor of the right to marry for same sex couples or homosexuals based on the fourteenth amendment and precedents set in past supreme court cases

3941 words - 16 pages marriage advocates look to the equal protection clause to drive out laws that ban same-sex marriages.Gay activists frequently use the analogy of miscegenation laws (laws banning mixed race marriages) and same-sex marriage bans to prove that same-sex marriage bans violate the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. Miscegenation laws spanned nearly three centuries from 1664 to 1967. Even after the Civil War, one of the first things

Court cases dealing with the 14th amendment

3406 words - 14 pages appoint him an attorney, they refused, stated that it was only required to appoint counsel to poor defendants in capital cases. Gideon then defended himself in trial, was then convicted, and the court gave him 5 years in a state prison. The court had to decide whether the state court's inability to appoint counsel of Gideon was a violation of his right to a fair trial and due process of law under the 6th and 14th amendment. In a unanimous

Court cases dealing with judicial review and the 2nd amendment

981 words - 4 pages there of are supreme. . . they control the constitution and laws of the respective states, and cannot be controlled by them.Martin v. WilksArgued/Decided-1989Title 7 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964The Jefferson County Personnel Board in Birmingham, Alabama, hired blacks as firefighters, as a result of a lawsuit in 1974. The Federal District Court approved of their decree. Robert K. Wilks (white firefighter) stated that whites were not given

Civil Liberties versus the USA PATRIOT Act

1882 words - 8 pages would be if an American citizen says something against the president, he or she could be investigated by the FBI just for exercising their freedom of speech. The USA PATRIOT Act also violates the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech by prohibiting the suspects in search orders from telling others about those searches, even where there is no real need for secrecy ("The USA PATRIOT and Government Actions that threaten Civil Liberties"). In

Supreme Court Cases

1211 words - 5 pages landmark case involving Brown and the board of education in Topeka, Kansas was that of a revolution all around the country witch also delt with similar problems and cases. Many children (more specifically black children) were admitted to the school of their choose without any flack now because of this case. The decision of the case reversed the "separate but equal" doctrine.Plessy Vs. Ferguson In the supreme court case Plessy versus Ferguson the

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

1789 words - 8 pages in the Fifth Amendment. The trial court agreed and found in favor of Hamdi. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the judiciary should defer to the Executive Branch’s designation of Hamdi as an enemy combatant in this of situation and reversed the lower court’s finding. Hamdi appealed this decision and the Supreme Court heard the case in 2004. There were two questions before the Court in this case. The first was whether or not

Were the Supreme Court Cases in the 1890's fair?

1462 words - 6 pages During the 1890's the Supreme Court dealt with three important cases that were not fair and really violated human rights. These three cases were the United States vs. E.C. Knight of 1895, Pollock vs. Farmer Loan's & Trust of 1895 and also Plessy Vs. Ferguson of 1896. The results of these cases were very unjust for a few reasons.The first court case that was unfair was U.S. vs E.C. Knight. The E.C. Knight Company with four other companies

Supreme Court Cases on Separation of Church and State Clauses

2424 words - 10 pages education. Justice Black, a member of the Supreme Court Justice Department, had stated, “School-sponsored prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment…The provision allowing students to absent themselves from this activity did not make the law constitutional because the purpose of the First Amendment was to prevent government interference with religion” (US COURT 3). When faced with this case, the Supreme Court opted half and

The Role of the Supreme Court, Government, Economics, and Protests in the Civil Rights Movement

1638 words - 7 pages the Supreme Court that instituted the separate but equal policy in the first place.Our government helped a large amount in the Civil Rights Movement, both presidents and congress contributed to the movement. Roosevelt helped blacks improve their rights, not as overtly as Kennedy did, but he made steps forward. "In his first year in office he made more appointments of qualified Negroes to the federal branch and federal office than Harding, Coolidge

The Supreme Court Extends 2nd Amendment Rights to the States

1205 words - 5 pages The Supreme Court ruled on June 28th that the 2nd Amendment's protection of the right to bear arms applies on state and city levels. The 5-4 decision along ideological lines echoed 2008's decision to strike down DC's handgun ban, citing the 14th Amendment as a major factor in the decision to extend the federal right to own a hand gun for personal protection down to local levels. Though it officially returned McDonald v. City of Chicago to the

Supreme Court Cases: The Contrast in the Constitution and Constitutional Law

1177 words - 5 pages This paper discusses the contrast of two landmark United States (U.S.) Supreme Court cases that helped to clearly define how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution is interpreted, and analyzes the difference between the “Constitution” and “Constitutional Law.” Two cases that are referenced in this analysis are (1) Katz v. United States, 386 U.S. 954 (U.S. March 13, 1967), and (2) Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (U.S

Similar Essays

Important Cases Of The Us Supreme Court

731 words - 3 pages Important Cases of the US Supreme Court The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the constitutional guarantees contained in amendments to the constitution. Among these Guaranteed rights are the freedoms of religion, speech, and press, along with the right of protection against illegal search and seizure, equal protection under the law, and the right to counsel. These rights all contained in the first amendment to the constitution are

The Supreme Court: Protector Of Civil Liberties Ubc/ Poli 101 Research Paper

1964 words - 8 pages The Supreme Court: Protector of Civil Liberties The Supreme Court of Canada essentially acts as an interpreter of the constitution. They play a distinct role in upholding the constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, protecting the civil rights, liberties, and moral standards of our society. Such standards should not, in any way, be inclined towards the interests of any political group in Parliament. Oftentimes, the

The Supreme Court And Personal Civil Rights

1224 words - 5 pages I. "Our constitution is colorblind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law.” – Justice John Harlan, in his dissenting opinion in the case Plessy v. Ferguson. (History of Brown v. Board of Education) The US Supreme Court has evolved to promote new personal civil rights for African-Americans, ultimately creating a more racially equal society. II. The first way that

The Supreme Court And Civil Rights

1147 words - 5 pages . “Rights were eventually applied against actions of the state governments in a series of cases decide by the Supreme Court,” Dawood stated. In previous years (1790-1803), the Supreme Court had little say in decisions being made by government. As time went on the Supreme Court took on more responsibility and started making additional decisions, which in time helped minorities gain their civil rights. It took a couple of years, as a matter of fact