Supreme Court Case Analysis American Express Company, Et Al. Vs. Italian Color

1311 words - 6 pages

There is an agreement between American Express and merchants who accept American Express cards. This card acceptance agreement contains a provision requiring all disputes between the two parties to be subject to arbitration on a non-class basis. The owner of a restaurant called Italian Color and other merchants filled a class action arguing that American Express used its monopoly to force them to accept American Express cards at higher rates than other competitors. The merchants claimed that American Express violated section 1 of the Sherman Act by tying them with an unlawful arrangement. They also argued that American Express violated the federal antitrust law.
American Express Company is an American financial company. This company is well known for its credit cards that are involved in a lot of transactions in the United States. Italian Colors restaurant represent a group of merchants that are owners of small stores.
The issue before the court is whether “the Federal Arbitration Act permits courts, invoking the “federal substantive law of arbitrability,” to invalidate arbitration agreements on the ground that they do not permit class arbitration of a federal-law claim.” (scotusblog) Whether or not the court can refuse to enforce class arbitration waivers and authorize class action lawsuits when the plaintiff individual claim is worth less than the cost of bringing that claim.
In front of the district court, American Express asked the court “to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act” (Davis Polk & Wardwell,2) The plaintiffs on the other hand argued that the court “should ignore the arbitration clause because a class-action lawsuit was necessary to “effectively vindicate” its antitrust claim.” ( Legal Information Institute). The district court ruled in favor of American Express and dismissed the case. Italian Colors appealed the decision of the district court. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the district court. It holded that the plaintiffs showed enough proofs “that arbitration would not allow it to effectively vindicate its antitrust claim” (Legal Information Institute).A long procedural intermezzo ensued: When American Express first sought certiorari, the Supreme Court granted the petition and remanded to the Second Circuit for reconsideration in light of Stolt-Nielsen v. Animal Feeds International (2010), which held that a party may not be compelled to submit to class arbitration absent a contractual basis for concluding that the party agreed to do so. But on remand the Second Circuit stood by its original ruling. (Hogan Lovells)
The antitrust law is the ground on which the plaintiff in this case sued American Express. They based their lawsuit on the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. According to the section 1 of the Sherman, Act15 U.S. Code § 1,“Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with...

Find Another Essay On Supreme Court Case Analysis American Express Company, et al. vs. Italian Color

The Supreme Court Vs. Salazar V. Buono Case

1103 words - 4 pages The Supreme Court was faced with a unique paradox during the case Salazar V. Buono; in which their ruling had to coincide with the establishment clause in the first amendment, while avoiding the dissenting opinions of thousands of veterans and their families they threatened to insult with their decision. In 1934, the VFW commissioned a white cross to be constructed on an outcropping known as Sunrise Rock in the Mojave National Preserve. In 1999

Legal Process Paper Describes how John can file a discrimination suit against his company with the EEOC. Starts from the beginning of the process through to the US Supreme Court.

1049 words - 4 pages documents pertaining to the lawsuit. During the pre-trial conference, the judge will attempt to resolve the matter between the attorneys in hope of avoiding a trial. The claim will go to trial if there is no settlement. Depending on the outcome of the trial, there is a possibility for appeal. A company may opt to settle at this point, because the cost of continuing may cost more in legal fees then the settlement would cost. Appealing a case is a

Supreme Court Case: Tinker V. Des Moines

823 words - 4 pages Many Supreme Court cases in the United States have reassured its citizens’ rights. One of those cases was that of the 1965 Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District case. This case was about five students who were suspended from school for wearing black armbands. Should the students have been suspended? The Tinker v. Des Moines case was a very controversial Supreme Court case in which the right to freedom of speech and

Kansas V. Cheever Supreme Court Case

898 words - 4 pages into jury selection, Cheever’s defense attorney became unable to proceed and the case was dismissed. In the meantime, the United States Supreme Court had reinstated the Kansas death penalty in Kansas v. Marsh, so the case was re-filed in Kansas state court. In October 2007, during Cheever’s state trial, he introduced his own expert, Dr. Evans, a psychiatric pharmacy specialist, he testified that over time, drug abuse inhibits brain functions

Supreme Court Cases - Dred Scott vs Sanford

574 words - 2 pages Dred Scott v. Sanford is a popular case in United States History. It set precedence for the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, the amendments that solely relates to African Americans. Dred Scott, a slave in 1857 declared his right to be free under the Supreme Court. In 1839 Scott and his master moved to Missouri, which was a slave state. Four years later, a U.S. army surgeon named Dr. John Emerson bought Scott and moved him into the free state of

Bowers V Hardwick Supreme Court Case

1028 words - 4 pages Bowers v. Hardwick United States Supreme Court Opinion This case, Bowers v. Hardwick, originated when Michael Hardwick was targeted by a policer officer for harassment in Georgia. A houseguest of Hardwick's let the officer into his home, where Hardwick was found engaging in oral sex with his partner, who was another male. Michael Hardwick was arrested and charged of sodomy. After charges were later dropped, Hardwick brought his case to the

Supreme Court Cases - Marbury vs Madison

649 words - 3 pages commission, a problem such as this one would not have emerged. Because of Marshall's fault that he didn't deliver the commissions, many believed that Marbury should not have been penalized for it.This case is important for the fact that it established judicial review that gave the Supreme Court the right to rule if something is constitutional or not. If the Supreme Corut did not have judicial review, Congress would decide for itself on the

Supreme Court Cases - Gibbons vs. Ogden

548 words - 2 pages The Gibbons v. Ogden case was also known as the "steamboat case" in 1824. It occurred when New York tried to grant a private concern on a monopoly of waterborne commerce between New York and New Jersey. Chief Court Justice John Marshall reminded them that the Constitution stated that Congress alone controlled interstate commerce. This case was a turning point for the expansion of federal power to address the national problems. Aaron Ogden

Supreme Court Cases- McCulloch vs Madison

572 words - 2 pages The landmark case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 unanimously ruled that the Constitution allowed Congress to establish the National Bank. The Court also asserted that the Constitution did not allow a state to tax the Bank. Chief Justice John Marshall stated that the Constitution does not explicitly grant Congress the right to establish a national bank, but also noted that the "necessary and proper" clause of the Constitution gives Congress the

The Supreme Court in American Politics

1386 words - 6 pages United States. The Court had limited free speech to all but those instances when there was clear and present danger. Although this test does limit the idea of Freedom of Speech it does so with the thoughts of America as a country and the American peoples’ safety in mind. Freedom of Speech is a right of every American citizen and that is why it is protected within the Constitution. In this case the Supreme Court used their authority wisely by

U.S vs. Microsoft court case.

853 words - 3 pages U.S vs. MicrosoftThe current pending case against Microsoft involves the U.S department of Justice anti-trust Division and Attorney generals from 19 U.S states. The topic of the case is whether or not Microsoft has violated and Anti-Trust laws by using its monopoly in the Windows operating system to eliminate competition and harm consumers. By creating higher prices and downgrading software quality they Federal government has stated that

Similar Essays

Jaffree V. Wallace Supreme Court Case: Analysis

3419 words - 14 pages submitted a petition for a Writ of Certiorari, which the Supreme Court granted. Jaffree’s case was to be heard by the Burger Court. This Supreme Court ruled from 1969, when Warren E. Burger was appointed Chief Justice in place of Earl Warren, until 1986. When compared to the acutely liberal Warren court of the Johnson era, the Burger court was certainly more conservative. This switch from the liberal Warren court to the more conservative

Supreme Court Case: Engel V. Vitale Analysis

1305 words - 5 pages all men and women of good will, and [they] call upon all of them to aid in giving life to [the] program" ("Supreme Court Collection").D. The court case of Engel v. Vitale originated in the state of New York, and was brought to the attention of a New York State Court by the malcontented parents of their children enrolled in the public school system. Reasoning behind the case being sustained within the state of New York rests as it was the place of

The Supreme Court Case Of Roe Vs. Wade

1819 words - 7 pages The Supreme Court Case of Roe vs. Wade In 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Roe V. Wade. Jane Roe was a single mother trying to raise one child on a limited income. She was living in Dallas Texas when she became pregnant with another child. There were no medical issues that would have prevented her from carrying this child to full term. The lack of income and already having a child was her deciding factor. In

Religious Freedom: Supreme Court Case Oregon Vs Smith

2155 words - 9 pages .804)In 1987 the state of Oregon appealed the states supreme court decision to the U.S Supreme Court, arguing that its criminal laws against the consumption of Peyote were relevant to the states interest in denying compensation benefits and Smith and Black's first amendment claims. The U.S Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Oregon Supreme Court because the court did not rule on whether the use of peyote for sacramental use was allowed