Supreme Court Justice Nominations Essay

700 words - 3 pages

Supreme Court Justice Nominations
     According to Floyd G. Cullop, The Supreme Court is responsible for “interpreting a federal, state, and local law and deciding whether or not it is constitutional,” making The Supreme Court of the United States perhaps the most powerful branch of the Federal Government. Although the Supreme Court does not make the laws, the justices do review the laws and decide if they are Constitutional. In fact, over the course of a justice’s tenure on The Supreme Court, he or she will have many opportunities to review laws and his or her decisions could affect the lives of many Americans. Furthermore, Supreme Court justices serve life terms, meaning that they hopefully do not have to make decisions in the hopes of getting re-elected. Although politics plays a heavy role in the nomination and subsequent confirmation of justices to the Supreme Court, hopefully after being confirmed, justices will follow the Constitution and make decisions fairly and justly.
     The qualifications to become a justice of the Supreme Court are the most lenient of the three branches of government. Actually, there are no formal requirements to be a justice. However, MSN Encarta says, “justices have all been lawyers, and most pursued legal and political careers before serving on the Court.”And since most have had political careers prior to their term on the Supreme Court, justices undoubtedly have had an affiliation with a political party. In fact, it was a President who initially nominated the individual for the position of justice and the Senate who confirmed them. The President and members of the Senate are very much influenced by their party, which makes it unlikely that they would nominate or confirm someone for the Supreme Court who would go against their party’s agenda.

     Idealistically, the President will nominate the best person to reside on the Supreme Court, and since the office in question has to due with allocating justice, the individual should be both fair and honest. Unfortunately, the process is more political than idealistic. According to MSN Encarta, “Presidents often try to secure Senate support by balancing the Court’s geographic and regional background. Many 20th-century presidents have also tried to balance the Court’s religious, racial,...

Find Another Essay On Supreme Court Justice Nominations

Brief Biography on Earl Warren, a United States Supreme Court Chief Justice.

712 words - 3 pages The "Superchief"Earl Warren is one of the most famous Chief Justice's to have ever served on the United States Supreme Court. His decisions made in court are those that still affect us to this very day. Throughout his life he held many offices of power. Besides being Chief Justice on the Supreme Court, he was the 30th Governor of the state of California and was also the California District Attorney.Earl Warren was born in Los Angeles, California

Judicial Choices Essay

874 words - 3 pages Lyndon B. Johnson nominated Abe Fortas as chief justice. In 1968, Johnson got the "whales" of the Senate to support Fortas. The scenario of a changing senate and rebellious "minnow" prevented Fortas from being chief justice.      The power of the judiciary went through a tremendous transformation from nonexistent to overwhelming. In the 1800s, the Supreme court had no active role in government until


1420 words - 6 pages . George H.W. Bush appointed Souter and Thomas as Rehnquist’s and O’Connor’s replacements. This meant that the Supreme Court was made up of eight Republican appointed justices and only one Democrate appointed justice. At the time of Justice Thomas’s nomination, President Bush seemed to want to put an end to the racial uniformity of the Supreme Court. He saw Thomas was a perfect candidate, as he was African-American and a conservative. Throughout

Checks and Balances in the US government

969 words - 4 pages the Constitution, determines the number of Justices who can serve in the federal and Supreme Courts. The Court has been composed of one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices. Justices are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.The Legislative branch of the federal government consists of the Congress, which is divided into two houses; the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives are elected to


720 words - 3 pages Framers is a passive endorsement of that power. I am convinced by Gauch that Framers intended the ‘Advice and Consent’ power of the Senate to have an ideological impact on the Supreme Court. Albert Melone, whose article ‘The Senate’s confirmation Role in Supreme Court nominations and the politics of ideology versus impartiality’ appears in the Judicial Polities text, quotes Gauch’s article nine times as he makes his case that ideological

Marbury v. Madison

1723 words - 7 pages . Subsequently, the Supreme Court's Chief Justice, John Marshall, came to the realization that the entire judiciary was in quit a quandary. If he authorized the writ of mandamus to Marbury then Jefferson would immediately repeal it thus demonstrating the judiciaries overall weakness by issuing an order that the executive easily disregarded. On the other hand however, if he denied Marbury's request for the writ then the court would be perceived as

The Honorable John G. Roberts, Jr : A Biographical Sketch of the 17th Chief Justice of the United States

1222 words - 5 pages to the D.C. circuit court, and this time he was approved receiving his commission on June 2, 2003. In 2005 President Bush nominated Roberts for the U.S. Supreme Court, because Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was retiring. This was the first time in 11 years that there had been a nomination for the Supreme Court. In September of the same year, Chief Justice William Rehnquist died. Two days later President Bush withdrew Roberts nomination as a

John Marshall's Effect on the American Judicial System

2697 words - 11 pages ) In 1783, Marshall was elected to the Virginia state legislature. By 1789, he became a prominent figure in Virginia's legislature. He refused several official nominations, including United States Attorney of Virginia, by George Washington. (78) In 1800, he was nominated as Secretary of State under President John Adams. During the winter of 1801, John Adams nominated John Marshall Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court

State Comparison

665 words - 3 pages preside over preliminary matters of felony and gross misdemeanor cases, civil matters up to $7,500 and issues of temporary protective orders and warrants. The Municipal Court cases preside over misdemeanor and traffic cases in incorporated communities and some civil matters (State Court Case Loads Statistics, 2003).The Arizona court system consists of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Superior Court that handles tax courts as well, the Justice

Judicial Review: 1803 Chief Justice John Marshall

2140 words - 9 pages --and all were confirmed by the Senate. On February 27, 1801, just days before Jefferson was to take office, Congress passed another bill. The Justice of the Peace Act provided Adams with the opportunity to appoint 42 justices of the peace to five-year terms in Washington (The Supreme Court Historical Society). Most of Adams's nominations went to deserving Federalists, and all were confirmed by the Senate. William Marbury was one of those appointed

Harry Andrew Blackmun

1077 words - 4 pages , 1970, Blackmun was nominated to the Supreme Court in President Nixon?s third attempt to fill the seat vacated by Abe Fortas. The Senate had rebuffed Nixon?s attempts to place a conservative southerner on the Court by rejecting the nominations of judges Clement F. Haynsworth, Jr., and G. Harrold Carswell. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger recommended Blackmun for the post.Blackmun established himself as a justice who preferred to focus on those

Similar Essays

The Controversial, First Black Supreme Court Justice: Thurgood Marshall         Thurgood

1180 words - 5 pages The Controversial, First Black Supreme Court Justice: Thurgood Marshall Thurgood Marshall was the first black man ever to be appointed to the United States Supreme Court. Marshall was one the finest and most recognized civil rights leaders of the 20th century. Marshall had a lot of liberal views that brought much controversy upon him. Marshall did what he thought would make for a better country and most certainly a more civil and

The Nomination Of William Rehnquist To The Supreme Court And The Power Of A Supreme Court Chief Justice

1102 words - 4 pages personality, judicial outlook and intellect can mold the courts image in public opinion and set the tone for what decisions are made and how. Thus, it is no surprise that for the past thirty years, the decisions and preferences of Chief Justice William Rehnquist have shaped the actions of the United States Supreme Court and the law. William Rehnquist received a law degree from Stanford University's Law School, where he graduated at the top of his

This Essay Is About Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, Warren Court Justice, Civil Rights. 3pages, 623 Words. No Works Cited.

633 words - 3 pages Chief Justice Earl WarrenPresident Dwight Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren as the fourteenth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1953. Warren had been the governor of California twice and was also on the republican ticket for Vice President under Thomas Dewey. It was assumed that Warren would pickup where his successor Fred Vinson left off as a conservative member of the Supreme Court, but instead Warren positioned himself as a liberal. When

John Marshall: The Most Influential Chief Justice Of The Supreme Court

682 words - 3 pages John Marshall: The Most Influential Chief Justice of the Supreme Court In the beginning years of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court was a struggling institution due to the lack of effectiveness of the Chief Justices and was not highly regarded by the executive and legislative branches of the government. The third Chief Justice in only twelve years, John Marshall put an end to the Supreme Court’s lack of influence after his