Living in a world where the smallest misuse of words can lead to someone feeling offended; the use of certain words should be kept to a simple meaning. In the pieces the biggest arguments that were used was the fact that people disliked the use of certain words leading few of the writers to feel offended. By simplifying the meanings or limiting words to have a specific meaning, the English language would be more easily accepted by people from different aspects of the language.
Sometimes confusion begins when the use of a common word is given a new definition. While one writer, Ray Magliozzi (the host of the award-winning show Car Talk) dislikes the use of the word “tall” replacing “small” at Starbucks. Magliozzi describes Starbucks as “the Tall/Short Mafia” and is upset with the way they describe the cup sizes for the drinks. Magliozzi says, “Now as good as their coffee is, they have unnecessarily complicated my life and probably everyone else’s life, too.” This sentence is used to describe how the description of the cup sizes complicate the lives of people who would like to order coffee in a way they are accustomed to but are forced to adopt this new scale. Magliozzi later goes on to say, “Today, I want to deal with their ridiculous size-related nomenclature” before he begins to talk about his understanding of the sizes. If words in the English language, in this example, were used strictly to what they mean people like Magliozzi would not have to deal with the struggle of ordering a “tall” coffee when they mean a “small”. Although it’s such a small thing when the words change meaning it frustrates people who can’t understand the situation at hand. By restricting the use of the words, people would be able to understand other’s conversations, meanings, and ideas.