The condoms display in the Hidden Heroes: the Genius of Everyday Things exhibit is a showcase that would cause an individual to wonder about adolescents’ overall knowledge of human sexuality. In today’s society, children are susceptible to learning about such a delicate topic not only from their families and peers, but through the media as well. These sources often provide misrepresentations of the information due to ignorance and biased views. Therefore, in order to inform individuals more accurately, sex education programs have been created with the intention to be implemented into schools across the country. This has led up to being one of the most controversial issues hovering over educational institutions, where the inclusion of such programs has been hotly debated. However, recently, the dispute is not so much about whether sex education should be taught in schools, but rather what content should be taught and what approach should be taken.
Before moving on, one must know that sex education is about, but not limited to the discussion of sexual intercourse. As a Buzzle article states, it involves a multitude of topics that introduce human sexual behaviors such as puberty, sexual health, sexual reproduction, sexuality, and more (Iyer). If formally received in school, these topics are brought up and discussed at age-appropriate times over the course of children’s junior high and high school education. Moreover, as I have introduced earlier, the way sex education should be taught is divided into two approaches. It is between taking either a conservative, abstinence-only approach or a more liberal, comprehensive approach. Abstinence-only education, approaches students by stressing the importance of “no sex before marriage” as being the only way to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STIs (Collins et al. 1). This position is commonly supported by conservative Republicans and religious groups (12). In contrast, the comprehensive approach stresses abstinence for youth, but acknowledging adolescences’ sexual activeness, also provides students with information on contraception and abortion (1). The institutional voice of this perspective is the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States, or SIECUS for short (14). Despite the fact that some individuals may see comprehensive sex education as immoral and unnecessary, such lessons should be mandatory in schools as they offer many benefits for our society’s future adults.
Governmental. First and foremost, the federal and state government has a responsibility “to ensure access to real sex education programs that will provide medically-accurate, unbiased and culturally competent information to keep youths healthy and safe” (“Comprehensive Sexual Health Education”). In Weiser and Miller’s journal article, Barak Obama vs. Bristol Palin, the authors explain that if the government continues to provide more federal funding for abstinence-only education, opposed to other approaches,...