This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Technological Advances Have Hindered Instead Of Aided Communication. Do You Agree?

617 words - 3 pages

Can you imagine a world without any way to communicate besides conversing or writing? Technology has resulted in leaps and bounds in the development of faster and more efficient ways for people to communicate and connected with each other globally. A letter that used to take weeks to travel from a sender to a recipient has transformed into a string of digits which are sent in under a second. People are able to hear one another while on opposite ends of the world with a simple telephone connection. With so many advances in technology, it is illogical to place the blame on technological advances for hindering communication when it has aided in mass communication, business communication and interpersonal communication.

Mass communication has become an integral part of our lives and technological advances have assisted in the dissemination of information to the general public. The development of mass communication is the result of new channels ...view middle of the document...

It is an undeniable truth that the world’s economy has undergone substantial growth ever since the industrial revolution. Modern day commerce is largely affected by the speed at which information can be shared between two or more parties for pivotal business decisions to be made. Beginning with the widespread use of fax machines and desktop computers and progressing onto the use of internet applications and email, the speed with which business can be conducted is only limited by the human factor. Technology is also able to connect international and regional businesses through new business innovations such as teleconferencing which allow colleagues to communicate with each other across different countries without the need to travel or for them to be in a localized area. Businesses are also able to communicate with their consumers a lot more effectively through the internet. They are able to advertise and reply to feedback from consumers which improves the strength of communication between the business provider and the consumer.

However, potentially the largest impact that technological advances have made on communication is the interpersonal communication between people. Communication improved through the invention of the telephone which allowed voices to be transmitted almost instantaneously between two parties. The telephone then evolved into the mobile phone which has allowed people to remained connected even when they are on the go. One such benefit is connecting people who live in different parts of the world. Families with relatives in other countries are able to enjoy conversing with one another and even video chatting with each other without the need to physically be in the same location or having to send letters that require a long time before reaching the intended recipient. This has helped to strengthen bonds between parties and made it easier for them to communicate with the world.

Technological advances have without a doubt played a large impact in contributing to the development and progress of communication. Together, they have made the world a smaller place and connected all corners of the globe.

Find Another Essay On Technological advances have hindered instead of aided communication. Do you agree?

Women have more power than men in the novel. Do you agree?

875 words - 4 pages authority and freedom outside the home. Women do have power within the home particularly with the children and family. The reader discovers some feminine power in Najwa which is illustrated in her parenting of Suleiman. When she feels guilt for her drinking bouts she takes him on a drive to their favourite café and insists on buying treats for him. When her husband is away on business, Najwa has the freedom to drive a car and make decisions about the

Ethics hinder scientific research. Do you agree?

660 words - 3 pages Ethics hinder scientific research. Do you agree? Ever since the scientific revolution, there have been countless breakthroughs in the scientific field. From the invention of the light bulb to the computers we stare at daily, it is axiomatic that such things can only happen due to the advancement in science. However, a myriad of scientific researches today have received strong opposition due to the ethical concerns regarding the research. This

Do you agree with the death penalty

508 words - 2 pages do.’4. There’s also an argument to be made that death is too good for the worst criminals. Let them wake up and go to bed every day of their lives in a prison cell, and think about the freedom they DON’T have, until they rot of old age. When Ted Bundy was finally arrested in 1978, he told the police officer, “I wish you had killed me.” Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (the architect of the 9/11 attacks) would love nothing better

Do You Have a Self?

1210 words - 5 pages ” because it does not always refer to the same combination of constituent things. Because the name is a mere empty sound, it does not refer to anything in reality. Therefore, the self does not exist in reality because there is no permanent thing that can be used to define it. I agree with the premises in Nagasena’s argument. I also agree that the constituent parts of the self are continuously changing. However, I do not agree with the conclusion

Do you have the right?

2152 words - 9 pages occurred under British rule would not happen again. They were added after the signing because at the time the congressmen did not believe that the government would ever infringe upon people’s rights and become tyrannical. Today we often take these rights for granted and do not exactly realize how much of a role they play in our lives. Look at your city. The people of the city have the ability to gather and protest, this is the freedom of assembly

'Abortion is never justified'. Do you agree? Give reasons to support your answer and show that you have thought about different points of view. You must refer to Christianity in your answer

1568 words - 6 pages I neither agree, nor disagree with the statement. I belive that having an abortion depends on a number of different factors, each contributing equally to whether a woman may or may not choose to have an abortion. Taking into account the knowledge of Christian teachings that I have acquired I still feel that abortion is justifiable in some cases and unjust in others. It depends on the religion, the beliefs and the situation the mother is in.In

"Even if conventional war is acceptable for Christians, nuclear war could never be." Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer, showing you have considered more than one point of view

597 words - 2 pages "Even if conventional war is acceptable for Christians, nuclear war could neverbe." Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer, showing you have considered more than one point of view.In the modern world, there has been much debate, particularly within Christian denomination groups, over the subject of nuclear war. As opposed to conventional warfare, nuclear war employs the use of weapons of mass destruction such as chemical, biological and

The reign of Edward VI saw a definite hardening of religious policy. Do you agree?

2007 words - 8 pages . A.G., The Reformation Crisis, Ed Joel Hurstfield, Edward Arnold 1965, p 53.Elton. G.R., The Tudor Constitution, Cambridge 1962, p335.Loades. D, Politics and the Nation, Fontana 1980, p200"The reign of Edward VI saw a definite hardening of religious policy." Do you agree?

How Far Do You Agree That the Policy of Appeasement Was the Main Cause of WWII?

1949 words - 8 pages Treaty of Versailles The Treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty that was signed by the UK, US, France, Italy and Germany, it ended the war between Germany and the Allied Powers. The Treaty of Versailles was signed on 28 June 1919. Hitler saw the Treaty of Versailles as a disgrace to the German people and an embarrassment to Germany. Hitler blamed the German politicians for signing the Treaty of Versailles as he thought Germany could have

"The benefits of globalization outweigh its cost." How far do you agree with this statement?

1478 words - 6 pages power, profits, and productivity. Globalization can also help to reduce the costs of transportation and communication due to technological advances and as well as lowering the costs of data processing, information storage and retrieval.Unfortunately, this is only the brighter side of things. The economy that globalization is encouraging is capitalist economy, which encourages capitalism, and some countries do not like this idea. Also, while some

Napoleon established order, ´but at the cost of individual freedom. do you agree?

1076 words - 4 pages ME 20 October 2004 Napoleon established order, but at the cost of individual freedom. Do you agree with this statement? There was so much chaos in France due to the Revolution. The laws were not clear, and to some, unfair, therefore Napoleon had to restore order in France. In result Napoleon came up with various laws, in which he put forward to France. Napoleon was a determined leader meant to have crowned the Revolution and his policies

Similar Essays

"The Soviet Union Should Be Responsible For The Cold War, Instead Of The Usa." How Far Do You Agree To This Statement?

1287 words - 5 pages After the world war, the world saw a phenomenon that has shaped the world to what we see today, an ice cold relationship between USA and the communist USSR, otherwise known as the cold war. Traditionalists have also thought that the soviets were to be blamed, while the revisionists have always blamed the USA and post revisionists feel that both parties have to be blamed. So who should be blamed for starting the cold war in the end? To a small

Sports Is A Waste Of Time, Do You Agree?

756 words - 3 pages Sports is a waste of time. Do you agree?What can give us health benefits besides exercise? A sport is commonly defined as an organized, competitive, and skillful physical activity requiring commitment and fair play. Playing a sport is an art. An art where you hone both physical and mental skills. No art can ever be a waste of time. Thus, I do not agree that sports is a waste of time.Sports gives us health benefits. Research by Harvard School of

To What Extent Do You Agree That Schools Have A Uniform

869 words - 3 pages Oliver DaviesTo what extent do you agree that schools have a uniform?From the ages of 5 to 16 by law every child in the UK must attend school; whether the school is state funded or privately funded they almost all have some form of school uniform. School uniforms are a requirement at almost all schools but in some state schools the regulations on school uniforms are a little looser than others, Meaning that some pupil wear pretty much whatever

To What Extent Do You Agree That Schools Have A Uniform

869 words - 3 pages Oliver DaviesTo what extent do you agree that schools have a uniform?From the ages of 5 to 16 by law every child in the UK must attend school; whether the school is state funded or privately funded they almost all have some form of school uniform. School uniforms are a requirement at almost all schools but in some state schools the regulations on school uniforms are a little looser than others, Meaning that some pupil wear pretty much whatever