Terrorism: Safety Vs Freedom Essay

2044 words - 8 pages

“The danger that darkened the United States of America and the civilized world on September 11, did not pass with the atrocities committed that day”. (Ashcroft, 2003) The terrors of 9/11 caused increased security that comes at a cost that many feel is an invasion of their charter rights. The idea of racial profiling is not new, but many feel worse than ever in today’s anti-Muslim society. This habit of losing civil liberties in the wake of terror is to some an unnecessary change that is unallowable, but leaves many wondering if we should sacrifice our freedom for safety.

The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, revealed a deficiency in the procedures of the airline security system. In an effort to address these concerns the “War on Terror” (Winterdyk/king, 2010) was born. This unleashed a new style of screening processes, including Bill C-36. Bill C-36 granted the American government and security agencies the power to implement a new wave of security processes that include the ATI (Advanced Imaging Technology). The change in security technology, as well as the increased threat level, has led to the need for increased security procedures in airports. The ATI’s have been hailed the greatest advancement in security screening technology (TSA security, 2011) and 80% of the public supports the increased security measures. (TSA security, 2011) Many family members affected by 9/11 are expressing support of the pat-downs, including Carie Lemack, whose mother was killed in American Airlines flight 11. She said, “I'm glad we're not waiting for more blood to be on our hands before we take the kind of security measures we need to take”. (Lemack, 2010)

The ATI’s are imaging tools that airport security staff uses to detect bombs or weapons on passengers, revealing a nearly naked grainy image of the person. The misconception the public has of someone seeing a nude picture of them is a major point of contention for many air travelers. The hands-on pat downs are even more controversial than the scanners. This act, is consider by many, an invasion of section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms which states, “Everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure”. (Charter, 2011)Everyone has heard horror stories of rude “grabby” TSA agents practically groping passengers. The stories such as Elizabeth Strecker being forced to show her prosthetic breast (Colebourn, 2011) are widely spread throughout the media, and the TSA becomes a monster accused of harassing the public. These aggressive pat downs have sparked a string of media websites asking people to protest the scanners and refuse to participate. One example of the viral effects of media is John Tyner, the man responsible for the “Don’t touch my junk” video, who is probably not the first person that has felt violated during an airport screening search. Tyner, who left the airport after refusing the pat down, was charged and counter-sued for $11,000 for leaving after...

Find Another Essay On Terrorism: Safety vs Freedom

Can Terrorism be morally justified? How and when? Or Why not?

2434 words - 10 pages terrorises nations and kills people."Walzer, in his book Just and unjust wars (2000) has problems succumbing to the idea that terrorism may be justified, and questions the probability of success criteria (is there a reasonable chance of success?) and points out that there is no nation that he knows of that owes its freedom to 'random murder'. Similarly Valls (2000) believes that in most cases there is little hope of success. The occupation of Iraq has

How to define terrorism. Essay

1558 words - 6 pages law, terrorist actions involve serious violence against a person, the endangerment of a person's life, and creation of a serious risk to the health or safety of the public. Title 22 of the U.S. Code describes terrorism as "premeditated, politically motivated violence" against "noncombatant targets by sub national groups", commonly with the intent to influence a wider audience. It is interesting to contrast these definitions with one fashioned by

Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified? If So How? If Not, Why Not?

3205 words - 13 pages of success?). He notes that 'no nation that I know of owes its freedom to a campaign of random murder.' Contrary to Walzer's views, Wilkins (1992) in his Terrorism and Collective Responsibility suggests that some terrorist campaigns in Algeria and Kenya accomplished their objective of national independence. Valls believes that 'we can not rule out that terrorism can satisfy the probability of success criterion,' but he notes that in most cases


2047 words - 8 pages governments and authorities broad powers at home. These powers have come in under the pretext to strengthen security and safety, yet the question remains at what cost? Has the cost been too high, in which some would argue goes at our very fabric of being resulting in victory for terrorism? We will examine how the Anti-Terrorist Act has come about and how it is viewed and evolved. Canada has made readjustments on its policies and laws towards

Terrorism Vs. Asmmetrical Conflict : 1972 Olympic Masacre (Munich)

843 words - 3 pages Terrorism vs. asymmetrical conflict:The 1972 Munich MassacreEver since September 11th at 8:45am, when the North Tower of the World Trade Center was struck by American flight 11, the word terrorism has taken on a whole new meaning, especially to us as Americans. In the past when we would hear of terrorism it always seemed to be taking place in the Middle East, African Embassy's, or Northern Ireland. It never really appeared to directly affect us

The Controversy Over New Airport Security Measures

2017 words - 8 pages The country’s recently heightened airport security measures have become a source of controversy and debate across the Nation. Due to a recent attempted act of terrorism, where a man on an international flight to Detroit attempted to blow up the plane using a bomb, the department of homeland security has taken new measures to ensure national security in the form of new high- tech full-body scans and pat down procedures in

The Freedom of Speech vs. Racism

1047 words - 4 pages on victims. In 1992, the court decided in R.A.V. vs. St. Paul that a cross burned in the front yard of an African American family by white teenagers was a form of protected symbolic speech. This decision effectively trumped the family's right to live in their home free from racial terrorism. Using the artificial distinction between speech and action, the Court decided that the act of burning a cross to intimidate a black family was equivalent to

Terrorism today.

1622 words - 6 pages TERRORISMFollowing the dramatic events of September 11, 2001, the issue of terrorism has become a permanent actor in the daily amphitheater of international politics. Every American should realize what terrorism entails, especially after 9/11. Whether or not we understand the proper meaning of terrorism, it has become a large, terrifying part of our society today.To clarify things, the scientific definition of terrorism is "the use of

Freedom or Security? An Analysis of the War Measures Act, 1970

929 words - 4 pages in Quebec, therefore extraordinary means were necessary to grapple with it. The FLQ attempted to intimidate and overthrow the government and democracy of the province of Quebec by using violence and terrorism. The federal government was confident that , through laws such as the War Measures Act, it would be able to put an immediate stop to such terrorism. The War Measures Act was greatly needed to secure freedom and safety in Canada, and would

Terrorism Today

4474 words - 18 pages as indiscriminate, the targeting of civilians or as, executed with disregard for human life. The term "terrorism" often is used to assert that the enemy's political violence is immoral and unjustified.Those labeled "terrorists" rarely identify themselves so and, instead, typically use terms referring to their ideological or ethnic struggle, such as separatists, freedom fighters, liberators, revolutionaries, vigilantes, militants, paramilitary

How the Patriot Act hurts patriots

1338 words - 5 pages time of chaos and paranoid fear that terrorists would come and destroy everything we hold dear, our families, our homes and our lives. But the Patriot Act itself is guilty of taking away the most precious thing of all, freedom. The Patriot Act was supposed to "intercept and obstruct terrorism." But it has instead threatened our civil liberties. When America unwittingly allowed the Patriot Act to pass, we surrendered our constitutional rights and

Similar Essays

Terrorism: Safety Vs Privicy Essay

1869 words - 7 pages Ever since 9-11, we as a country have been divided on many issues. One of the most discussed considers the question of whether retaining our privacy is more important than ensuring our safety. The two texts I will be using to explore this question are: Mobile Phone Tracking Scrutinized by Nikki Swartz Published in the Information Journal, which bills it’s self as “the leading source of information on topics central to the management of records

Terrorism Essay

617 words - 2 pages I chose this article on the effects that terrorism has had on the freedom of Americans because it presented some relevant points on the " American's right to freedom vs. better security" issue. After reading this article I have a better understanding of both views. Overall, it made me wonder: Are these new security measures taken going to limit my freedom or are they really going to stop terrorists? This issue is important to me and should

American Jihad: Homegrown Terrorists Essay

1922 words - 8 pages physical appearance would allow her to “blend in with many people ... (United States vs. Colleen R. LaRose) Americans have abilities such as the “English language skills, the ability to navigate Western culture, society, and context are likely key ingredients for successful strikes” (Kenney). But how many of these “terrorists “ are actually real and how worried should everyone be for all of our safety, when it has been said that being attack

Effects Of Uk Anti Terrorism Laws On Human Rights

2836 words - 11 pages legislations since 2000 and the majority of research suggests that whilst the UK government has a duty to protect its citizens, there is concern at the severity of measures put in place to deal with this (ICJ, 2006). The most pressing issue with terrorism legislation is the definition of terrorism. In the terrorism Act 2000, the definition of terrorism includes “Action which creates a substantial risk to to the health or safety of the public