This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Peter Singer's Argument In Famine, Affluence And Morality

1777 words - 8 pages

This paper explores Peter Singer’s argument, in Famine, Affluence, and Morality, that we have morally required obligations to those in need. The explanation of his argument and conclusion, if accepted, would dictate changes to our lifestyle as well as our conceptions of duty and charity, and would be particularly demanding of the affluent. In response to the central case presented by Singer, John Kekes offers his version, which he labels the and points out some objections. Revisions of the principle provide some response to the objections, but raise additional problems. Yet, in the end, the revisions provide support for Singer’s basic argument that, in some way, we ought to help those in need.
Singer presents his argument specifically in terms of famine relief and, although it has broader applicability, the discussion mostly falls under this specific topic. Thus, he conforms his argument around aspects relevant to famine and/or poverty when laying out his three core premises.
The first premise of his argument (P1) states Most people would agree with this premise, regardless of their specific reasoning. Connecting suffering and death to a lack of basic needs seems clear and its characterization as bad seems to be in alignment with our common sense. However, some might still object for reasons that would be challenging or impossible to refute. In spite of any such objections, the premise can be accepted and those who disagree should step away at this point.
The second premise (P2) states The challenge here does not lie in the prevention of something bad since this would seem rather uncontroversial given our acceptance of P1. But, the sacrifice clause requires clarification before proceeding. It means, from a moral point of view, causing any comparably bad outcome or something intrinsically wrong or even the failure to achieve some good that is equal to or better than the bad to be prevented.
The concern for P2 is that the sacrifice clause involves some type of moral calculus to determine the relative good or bad to be sacrificed and it’s comparability to the bad to be prevented. The amount of sacrifice required would drive us toward a level of marginal utility, so Singer proposes a more moderate version of the second premise (P2’) –In this version, the sacrifice clause would create an obligation to act in cases where we would give up something insignificant.
Consider an example: After a heavy rain, I am walking through the park and I notice a child in the retention pond, struggling to avoid being sucked into a drainage pipe. In this circumstance, by P2’, I ought to jump in and save the child’s life. The motivation is my duty to prevent her death, which would be very bad, in spite of the insignificant sacrifice of wet clothing or damaged phone.
It would seem plausible this is something we should readily accept, but it radically changes how we view our moral obligation to help others. For one thing, nearness is unimportant so obligations would not...

Find Another Essay On Peter Singer's Argument in Famine, Affluence and Morality

Famine, Influence And Morality Essay

1966 words - 8 pages cost of saving the child's life is approximately equal to the cost of replacing the damaged clothing and is also thereby insignificant compared to the death of a child. Noting these similarities it seems that in the same way it is morally necessary to save the drowning child, it is also morally essential to give money for famine relief because they both save a child's life and do not sacrifice anything morally significant.While Singer's argument

Peter Singer's "Rich and Poor": A Reflection - Trinity University--Intro to Ethics - Essay

708 words - 3 pages biological standard for needs such as shelter and food. On the other hand, those facing absolute affluence, “affluent by any reasonable definition of human needs...have more income than they need to provide themselves adequately with all the basic necessities of to spend money on luxuries” (129) are not ethically obliged to help one another. Although people fortunate enough to live in developed countries are provided with ample

How Do We Farm If We Must?: Analysis With Peter Singer's Down on the Factory Farm and Stanley Curtis's The Case for Intensive Farming of Food Animals

2537 words - 10 pages Factory farming is often a sore spot for American and other first world consciences. Even those that are ethically comfortable with consumption of animal products are often discomfited by the large-scale maltreatment of living creatures that is present in contemporary agribusiness. Writings that are similar to Peter Singer's “Down on the Factory Farm”, which depicts the multitude of unnatural horrors and abuses that billions of farm animals

Ethics and Morality in Vegetarianism

2414 words - 10 pages food is wrong. However, ethical vegetarianism is not only concerned with the question of using the meat of an animal as food, but also with some other problems. People take animal lives in order to use their skin, fur, and to conduct experiments. According to Tom Regan, animals have the same right to life as humans have. He also says that animals deserve moral reformation and justice towards them. From Peter Singer’s thesis we see that an animal’s

Morality and Ethics in Vegetarianism

838 words - 4 pages humans have. He also says that animals deserve moral reformation and justice towards them. From Peter Singer’s thesis we see that animal’s ability to suffer show that they deserve moral consideration and respect. Modern vegetarian movements think that the attitude of people towards animals killing is a huge problem of our society. Unfortunately, one of the parts in the life of modern society is violence: the resolution of interstate conflicts

Ethics and Morality in Philosophy

873 words - 3 pages Morality has always been an unacknowledged and crucial role in defining ethics. Principles tend to be a virtue that applies only within society and can be distinguished from law, religion, or ethics. Morality in its defining sense can be different from each other, depending on the foundations of the society that claim their morality. Different societies have a different sense of what their moral priority would be like. Their morality can be

The Irish Potato Famine and The Holocaust in Literature

5999 words - 24 pages The Irish Potato Famine and The Holocaust in Literature Writers often use literature as a means of communicating traumatic events that occur in history, and such events are recorded by first-hand accounts as well as remembered by people far removed from the situation. Two traumatic events in history that are readily found in literature are The Irish Potato Famine and The Holocaust. A literary medium that has been used quite poignantly to

Microorganisms and the Great Potato Famine in Ireland

1020 words - 5 pages Fungi, often referred to as friendly fungi. In 1928 Penicillin, one of the most famous of antibiotic drugs was discovered having derived it from the fungi called Penicillium. This discovery has since has a huge impact on helping people across the globe. However, not all is it seems, there are some nasty fungi that can cause diseases in plants, animals and people. A famous one being Phytophthora infestans. This caused the Great Potato Famine in

Political Action and Morality in Machiavellian Times

1453 words - 6 pages be in the hands of the morally virtuous ruler, Machiavelli produces a contrary argument, in which morality plays no role in judging the difference between legitimate and illegitimate uses of power. To this end, he argues that a ruler’s only concerns are the acquisition and maintenance of political power. This reputation, whether wholly deserved or not, results in Machiavelli being seen as Renaissance Italy’s strongest proponent of Realism and the

Human Morality in Hamlet and The Oresteia

1511 words - 7 pages When placed in a situation out of one’s control, the individual freedom of choice is apprehended, often leading to cognitive dissonance followed by a resolution in which an ultimate decision is made based on a consolidation of personal ethics. However, such resolutions are not achieved easily. In both William Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet and Aeschylus’ classical trilogy The Oresteia, the progression of human morality is examined through the

Morality and Revenge in Shakespeare's Hamlet

790 words - 3 pages and uncorrupt mind, but also avenge his fathers’ murder, Hamlet forges a letter in order to demonize and vilify Claudius in order to claim the throne. Shakespeare’s Hamlet takes place in a medieval and diseased Denmark that allows for injustices, revenge, etc. Hamlet is often thought of as a play about revenge, whereas in actuality it is a play about morality and the consequences of poorly thought out and impulsive actions. Despite the brutal

Similar Essays

Famine, Affluence, And Morality Essay

2013 words - 8 pages “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”      In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer is trying to argue that “the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation… cannot be justified; indeed,… our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society”(Singer 230). Peter Singer provides striking examples to show the reader how realistic his arguments

"Famine, Affluence And Morality", Article By Peter Singer

700 words - 3 pages In "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" Peter Singer argues that affluent individuals, in fact, almost all of us are living deeply immoral lives by not contributing to the relief and prevention of famine. The causes of famine are various and include human wrongdoing, but this doesn't matter, according to Singer. What matters is that each of us can minimize the effects of the famines that are now occurring and can take steps to prevent those that

The Problem Of Poverty In Famine, Affluence, And Morality By Peter Singer

1259 words - 6 pages poverty and cannot benefit those in need. In his work “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer touches one of the most painful problems facing the modern world – the affluence of the developed world and the poverty and famine in developing countries. At the center of Singer’s philosophic argument is the question of charity and its relation to duty. It is no secret that, in 1971, thousands of people in Bengal were dying of hunger (Singer

An Essay On Peter Singer, The Author Of Famine, Affluence, And Morality

639 words - 3 pages Peter Singer, the author of Famine, Affluence, and Morality, attempts to distinguish between obligation and charitable motivations. He tries to show that wealthy people should do more to help the people of the world who are needy and suffering from famine. Many people think that giving to famine relief is a good deed, but is optional. Singer believes it is mandatory and morally justified for the fortunate to help the deprived as much as possible