What Was Not Great About The Great War

1219 words - 5 pages

The Great War
Was it Actually Great?
When you hear the word “great” you think well that sounds like it should be associated with some sort of happy term so to speak. But if you hear that same word associated with the word war it makes you wonder does it have a different meaning that maybe I am not aware of. Well the truth is yes you do think differently. The Great War, which is also known as World War 1, has a totally different definition. There was absolutely nothing great about it unless you count different countries coming together to go to war with other countries that form allies. What first initiated or triggered the war to occur? So what were the causes of the war? And what are some long term effects of the war that had an after lasting effect on all the countries that were involved. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand triggered the World War I. The long term effects of World War I was imperialism, alliance systems, and financial situations.
The event that triggered World War I was the fact that Archduke Ferdinand heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne was wanting to create the triple monarchy. There was already a double monarchy in place which included Austria and Hungary and he wanted to add Serbia to the mix. However, the Serbs did not want that they wanted Serbia to become an independent state all on their own. So the Serbians thought that they would take matters into their own hands so they came up with a plan to assassinate Archduke Ferdinand. The Serbs figured if they assassinated the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne then if there was not an heir to the throne then they would not become a part of the triple monarchy.
Austria started thinking that Serbia was responsible for the assassination, but they had no prove that Serbia was responsible for the assassination. The Austrian leaders really wanted to make and prove a point to the Serbs. On July 23, the Austrians issued an ultimatum to the Serbian government. Luckily for the Austrian government the Serbian government accepted all of the ultimatum except for one part. So what part did they not accept? Well they did not accept the part of the ultimatum that said that the Austrian officials could take part in the Serbian investigation of who was connected to the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. So as we all know that is not good. So we know for certain that the Serbs are responsible, but it does not look like they are going to take responsibility for partaking in such a vicious crime. So what happened next? Well as you could imagine the Austrian government was not happy at all for their noncooperation of such a hasty crime that they decided to do the next best thing which was declare war on Serbia.
At this point in time, we know there is going to be a war but who is going to side with who. When the war was declared politicians and generals knew that there was going to be two factors that had a helping hand in the events that were going to occur. The factors were the...

Find Another Essay On What Was Not Great About the Great War

The Not So Great Gatsby Essay

1409 words - 6 pages book 'The Great Gatsby?'; I believe it is because Nick is the narrator and does see him as great. When I was finished reading this novel I did not come off thinking not thinking 'wow that man was really great.'; I came off thinking (among other things) 'wow that title is not accurate'; because there is an abundance of evidence to the contrary even when it is presented by a narrator that thinks he is great. I believe that is what Fitzgerald wanted us to think (among other things).

Was, and if so to what extent was Alexander the Great, cruel?

1223 words - 5 pages actual razing itself as cruel terrorism. Unlike the massacre, Alexander had time to think about what he was doing but made a calm and cunning decision to burn an entire city to the ground.The enslavement of children was even in ancient Greece not that common, and societal views cannot save Alexander's reputation in this instance.Once the Persian cavalry had been put to flight in Alexander's first battle, the Battle at the Granicus, he authorized the

Gatsby's dream was what destroyed him- an essay about The Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald, and the way dreams can destroy the actual life

987 words - 4 pages and suffer the consequences. This is what happened to Jay Gatsby. In F. Scott Fitzgerald's book "The Great Gatsby" written in 1925we are made known the story of a man that becomes extremely rich starting from nothing He is in love with a girl, or better to say with a dream, that is called Daisy. She is very rich and he is very poor. He wants to become rich though and she becomes all he is striving for. He wants to have her and he doesn't want to

Peter the Great vs. Catherine the Great--Who Was Greater?

1130 words - 5 pages the Great. These two rulers did precisely what was required for them to do for Russia to accelerate and become a nation able to boast its power.Like many other rulers who rule with an iron fist, Czar Peter I was not someone one would label amiable or even simply cold to others--he was cruel. He was a tall man who possessed a fiery temper, which he did not attempt to suppress. Peter I was cruel and ruthless to the point where he locked up his own

Alexander the Great: Was He Really That Great?

1125 words - 5 pages History 2013). The Battle of Gaugamela was the final meeting between Alexander the Great of Macedon and King Darius III of Persia. Darius prepared a battleground on the plain of Gaugamela and posted his troops to await Alexanders advance. After this victory, Alexander was, without question, the King of all Asia. (Britannica 2013). Alexander the Great may have been known for being one of the greatest military leaders in the world, but it is not the

Was "Peter the Great", Czar of Russia, actually Great?

1060 words - 4 pages receives can be used for harm, the power granted could likewise be used for the good of Russia. One such czar was Peter, often called "Peter the Great" because of the great advances he made in modernizing Russia and the important changes that were brought about under his reign. Peter "the Great" deserves the title of great.Peter did much to increase the size and power of Russia, therefore modernizing Russia. According to a Russian historian, "He

“Alfred was not only a great warrior, but more importantly a nation builder”. Explain whether or not this quote is a true assesment of King Alfred the Great.

1031 words - 4 pages Untitled "Alfred was not only a great warrior, but more importantly a nation builder". Explain whether or not this quote is a true assesment of Alfred. King Alfred the Great was not only a great warrior, but more importantly a nation builder. I think this quote is a true assesment of Alfred and I will explain why in the pages that follow. Alfred was born into a royal family in 849 in Wantage (now in Oxfordshire

Was Germany primarily responsible for the outbreak of the Great War?

3129 words - 13 pages resist a powerful German military, and German forces would rapidly enter France. The remaining 10% would defend the eastern border of Germany against Russian attack.It was this plan that showed Germany was responsible for causing the Great War because it did not matter what else occurred, Germany was intent on turning the Balkan crisis into a European war. As part of the Schlieffen plan involved violating Belgium neutrality thus bringing Britain

Why was it that a great many of Americans opposed US involvement in the Vietnam War?

989 words - 4 pages economic factors with the significant role of the media. When an average American enjoying his breakfast in a coffee shop, he was very likely to have a newspaper in his hands, and the headline would be the ongoing news in Vietnam with some gruesome pictures on the cover. It surely did affect his view of the war. During WWI and WWII, the technology of television and photography was not very well developed, and all the news about the wars would be

Was Alfred the Great a good monarch?

1421 words - 6 pages today still debate whether Alfred still deserves the sobriquet 'the Great'. As Alfred lived a millennium ago, we do not know that much about him, and what we do know is somewhat biased. One of the main primary sources on Alfred, Asser's biography, evidently has bias because Asser was commissioned by Alfred to write it. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles, the other main source for information about Alfred was also founded by him and thus would have been

How the great pyramid was real

2227 words - 9 pages planning and building the Great Pyramid. The entire process was completed within Khufu's 23-year reign in about 2600 B.C. (Casson 23). The use of physical labor and simple tools was the method of construction. Egyptians had very limited resources in their geological area. The pyramid was constructed of about two million blocks of stone, most of them weighing two and a half tons apiece (Edwards 116).No records of the architectural design, written by

Similar Essays

Was Alexander The Great 'great'? Essay

765 words - 4 pages , how great was Alexander the Great? In order to be great, a person should be courageous, intelligent, and a good leader. Courage is to be brave and not back down in the face of adversary and intelligence is the ability to acquire knowledge and the wisdom to apply it. Being a good leader means to be able to gain the support and respect of your followers through your actions and be able to lead them to a common goal. Alexander was great

My Great Grandmother Was Not A Person

631 words - 3 pages My Great-Grandmother was not a Person My Great-Grandmother was not a person. Neither was yours. Up until about 67 years ago no females were. We were supposed to be pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen. At least that's the perception that the laws enforced. (For ex: The Election Act of the Dominion of Canada and The Common Law of England) As part of the British Commonwealth many of our laws were the same as England's and enforced by British

Marcus Antonius Was Not A Great Man

1115 words - 4 pages had not wished it so and granted Antony the required funds, would Antony have still been capable of rising to office? One cannot say for sure what would've happened, but in hindsight, it's quite clear that Antony was incapable of accomplishing such a task without the support of powerful men. The events in the life of another of Antony's blood relatives provides ample proof that Antony did not direct history, but rather took up with the

Alexander The Great...Not Soo Great? Essay

1095 words - 4 pages Hephaestion died. I could not even find any information on that alcohol that they were consuming insuch great quantities. How come they make it sound like it is such an unhealthy drinkwhile consuming it? Especially since I doubt that the Indians would still produce thedrink if it was killing their population. In my opinion, the movie was a historians idea of what happened, I found little tono evidence supporting this ideas. In