The 2nd Amendment Does Not Allow Gun Control

3696 words - 15 pages

Throughout American History looking all the way back to the late 18th Century and the Revolutionary War, there have been many qualities that set America apart from all other countries. Documents like the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights bestowed upon Americans have spelled out some of these very qualities that Americans hold dear. One right that is often brought to the forefront of the argument over gun control is found within the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”(1). This powerful statement sets the foundation and precedent for our founding fathers’ intent for Americans to keep their firearms at all costs. When this right is in jeopardy of being infringed upon, it is the duty of Americans to fight back for their freedoms just as they would do for the very land they set their feet upon. Additionally James Madison, one of the founding fathers stated during the ratification period of the Constitution that, “the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation…[where] the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms” (Madison 1). If those who founded our country believed in the right that Americans have the choice of being armed, then it should not the minority of law makers doing their best to strip those rights away.
History is never free from critics and opposition. The 2nd Amendment, which is no stranger to public criticism, grants individuals inalienable rights. The National Rifle Association, an organization that has been around for 139 years working to educate and protect the 2nd Amendment rights of Americans wrote that “the Founding Fathers created the Bill of Rights to protect the rights of individuals. The freedoms of religion, speech, association, and the rest all refer to individual liberties. The Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms is no different” (1). This statement is an excellent point because so often, especially in the present day, we hear the argument for the freedom of speech. People adamantly grasp to this right citing it whenever there is objection for which they say this right which allows for. This individual right is consistently held up as self evident, so why would the right granted by the 2nd Amendment be any different? Gun control advocates and laws have attempted to pawn off 2nd Amendment rights as something that was never intended to belong to the individual and in doing so have infringed on American’s rights, all the while failing to stop criminals from committing gun violence in the process.
The first major attempts in enacting new gun control laws came about in the late 1920’s. While there were a few earlier attempts in the 1800’s, they were not influential in the sense of affecting the entire nation. In 1927, the...

Find Another Essay On The 2nd Amendment Does Not allow Gun Control

America Does NOT Need Gun Control

2516 words - 10 pages , despite the claims of gun control activists, gun control does not reduce crime, it only leaves law abiding citizens increasingly vulnerable to violent crime.      One common claim of gun control advocates is that gun control in foreign countries, notably Great Britain, is responsible for their lower crime rates. They present statistics showing that Britain has lower murder rates than America, but skip some other interesting information

Gun Control Does Not Reduce Crime

1248 words - 5 pages guns. Deaths from X are sure to be higher in states with more X. On the other hand it is no secret that the upper New England states have both some of the laxist gun laws and lowest crime rates out of any states in the Union. It is important to remember the old adage: "Correlation does not imply causation". If it turned out that states with less gun laws tended to have less crime it wouldn't necessarily mean that the lack of gun laws caused

The Endless Debate over Gun Control and the Second Amendment

883 words - 4 pages Gun control is one of the controversial issues that has existed for over two hundreds years. This issue is not as simple as many people might think because it is not only about the rights question, but it is also relevant to safety, crime, and education aspects. Guns were created for hunting and protection purposes, but not every citizen in the United States can handle guns safely and appropriately. There are many states in America have passed

The Bible Does Not Allow the Death Penalty

971 words - 4 pages United States has been pointed to as a major factor in crime rates. But gun proponents emphasize the Second Amendment of the US Constitution as the reason handgun ownership cannot be denied to the majority of citizens. Also, Americans have been desensitized to violence by various media. Psychologists at Iowa State University showed that “exposure to violent video games increases aggressive thoughts, angry feelings, physiological arousal and

Gun Control: Is It Really in the Second Amendment

952 words - 4 pages The Second Amendment states that “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. The way the Supreme Court interprets this amendment changes constantly because not even the Supreme Court fully understands the limits and rights given to citizens. Some argue that this amendment protects our right to own a gun, but is not very clear. Over the years

Commonsense Control, Not Gun Control

1281 words - 5 pages . They want a ban on all firearms. But that is not the solution, the solution is the education of every person that purchases a firearm and required trigger locks, and stricter compliance by judges to the sentences mandated for crimes involving firearms.The 'most recent attempt at federal gun legislation was the Gun Control Act of 1968' (Goldwater 183) and has done little if anything to lower the number of crimes committed using firearms. In fact

Gun Control is not the Answer

882 words - 4 pages , Labor, State, Transportation, Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as well as the Attorney General. The Administration wants to remove guns saying this will reduce gun violence by implementing gun control laws in the United States of America. It's not the gun... it's the person pulling the trigger. Guns are inanimate objects and cannot kill people on their own. Getting rid of guns will only going to leave civilians defenseless at a time of danger. It

Gun Control: Does It Work?

1018 words - 4 pages since to allow people the right to bear arms!The facts show that gun control should not be as controversial an issue as it has been for years, but that it does nothing to improve crime rates or cut down on violence. There is no direct relationship between the number of guns and the amount of crime in the United States. Between 1973 and 1992 the rate of gun ownership increased by forty-five percent while the homicide rate fell by nearly ten percent

What does gun control do?

825 words - 4 pages Pro-gun control advocates are flawed in the reasoning for stricter gun laws because stricter gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law abiding owners and doesn’t affect the criminals that are the ones that commit crimes and are not obeying laws. If the crimes are being committed by ones that already do not obey the laws that are in force now then what good does stricter gun control do? There has been other countries that have

Differing Interpretation on 2nd Ammendment on Gun Control in U.S

986 words - 4 pages Gun control policies regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession and use of firearms. In The United States the issue of gun control has been a hot topic for many years. The second amendment to the constitution "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" means that individuals may own guns, not just police and military however; Democratic lawmakers believe this may not be the way the amendment was intended to be interpreted. One

America Needs Criminal Control, Not Gun Control

1935 words - 8 pages criminals with extensive criminal backgrounds to return to live among society. While a case can easily be made to improve/enforce existing gun control laws, it is key to point out that criminals are criminals due to the fact that they do not follow laws, whereas law-abiding citizens do. There is no reason why a law-abiding citizen should be forced to accept a system that would allow someone convicted of murder the chance to get out of prison after

Similar Essays

The Second Amendment Vs Gun Control

1904 words - 8 pages not help society as intended; just as giving up your constitutional rights no more ensures a safer environment nor does the gun advocate who follows laws promoting progressive gun safety. Gun ownership is about your constitutional right: the 2nd Amendment. Many people may be robbed of their right to bear arms. In Maloney v. Cuomo, the Second Circuit panel held that New York’s ban on in-home possession of Nunchaku violated neither the Second

The Second Amendment And Gun Control

2443 words - 10 pages Gun Control According to the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Gun control is unfair to the ordinary citizen since it limits their ability to protect themselves. According to the Wikipedia, gun control, as any law, is meant to provide the guidance that in terms of handling all

Gun Control And The Second Amendment

721 words - 3 pages Spresser PAGE 4 Teresa SpresserInstructor Gordon PetersBUS23023 April 2013Gun Control & The Second AmendmentThe second amendment states "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." To an average person this means that anyone at anytime should be able to possess a gun without being questioned. However, if you interpret the amendment based

America Does Not Need Gun Control

1318 words - 5 pages citizens have turned in their firearms while others no longer carry them out of the house, or carry their handguns about in a locked case in their car (where they are about as useful a means for defense as butter for cutting granite). Clearly, the law is only a restriction upon those who obey it. Another problem is deciding whether or not gun control laws are even, well, lawful. This is not as cut and dried as it may seem because it is not enough