The Approach of U.S. Foreign Policy and Terrorism
U.S. foreign policy is plunging head first in its war on terrorism. Our focus is expanding and including various dynamics that harbor American interests. By broadening our focus in our war on terrorism, we are beginning to spread ourselves too thin. Therefore, we risk the danger of fighting too many battles at once. Terrorism is a large issue that American foreign policy will not be able to tackle in the manner it has set out to do.
Recently, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle voiced his concern over the direction the U.S. is taking in its war on terrorism. He was criticized because his statements are "one of the most critical assessments to date of the U.S. war effort," and therefore "divisive at a time when the country needs to be united," (Bash). Daschle stated the war has been successful up until now, but was concerned the war effort has been spreading "without clear direction," (Bash). Daschle's statement reflects a growing concern in Congress on the expansion of the war on terrorism. U.S. foreign policy and its approach to the war are broadening to include a widening spectrum of terrorist related issues in more regions of the world.
Daschle's main concern is that foreign policy initiatives supported by Congress in the aftermath of September 11th are taken as a blank check to expand the war on terrorism. Particularly, in the movement of American troops to regions of the world where events were not considered directly linked to US interests or security threats previously. His argument rests in the lack of communication between the Bush Administration and Congress on war initiatives. For example, despite regular briefings between Congress and the Administration, many in Congress were not aware of the decision to send American troops to Georgia or Yemen.
The war is beginning to be an excuse for the U.S. to go after its enemies. With the all-encompassing threat of terrorism, foreign policy is able to use play on words in order to have a justified reason to get directly involved with other regions of the world. Our interests are at stake and there is not a better time to assert such force. Congress is generously agreeing to aid the war and the world's support is on our side. Under our foreign policy initiatives, we are able to manipulate reasons to include new aspects that fall under threats of terrorism, thus threats to the national security of the United States.
The United State’s consideration of deploying troops to the former Soviet Union republic of Georgia aims to provide training and equipment to Georgian forces to patrol and combat the border shared with Chechnya. There is evidence that fleeing Al Qaeda fighters, particularly in the Pinski Gorge area, have joined Chechen rebels. Interestingly enough, “ Before September 11, Russia had faced regular and harsh criticism from the West for alleged human rights...