The Attack At Pearl Harbor
1941 December 7th was the day in which will live in infamy and also controversy. The Attack at Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack on the American fleet at the at the navy base in pearl harbor at Hawaii. Japanese attackers us hard and the planes came in waves, the first hit us at 7:53 and the second hit us at 8:55. Nothing but chaos was left. 2,403 dead, 188 planes. But was this attack really a surprise? Did we really know about it before hand? Or did we just really be bombarded with a Japanese surprise attack.
Marine corporal E.C. Mightingale was aboard “The Arizona” and was there that infamous morning. He was there, he lived it and could feel the pain and see his fellow marines die. He does have bias. He was there so he was a primary source. This event was described very formal because he was a solider and in the military. He keeps it very natural even though it was a negative event in his opinion (Mightingale 1). He doesn’t emphasize and parts other there the parts when he is wow! Which is the first wave or attacks. He leaves out the pre planning of the event due to the fact that he is a American solider. This account was somewhat different being of his formal tone and his passion in it (Mightingale 3)
Another surprise Attack on Pearl Harbor by Roger Parkinson. Roger Parkinson graduated in war studies and later obtained his masters degree in Strategic Studies at King’s College, London. After a period of newspaper reporting he became Defense Correspondent of “The Scotsman” in 1964. He wrote books on war such as “the Origin of World War I. The Origins of World War II. Clausewitz and Peace in Our Time.(dust jacket) he was educated and that influenced his perspective on Pearl Harbor because he can step back and look at both sides and think critically.
Parkinson retells us the horrible story of Pearl Harbor going through all the major events of it. There is no real bias. He keeps it neutral for the sake educating young people. He does emphasize in his book the fall of peace among the nations and well as the attack itself. Because this is a secondary source it is different from other primary sources because the author. Roger Parkinson, is a very educated man and his source is not one sided account he views the whole thing and is more neutral since he is from London and not from the United States were the attack happen(parkinson17).
Another source by John Suits talks about the attack at pearl harbor and how it is the date in which shall live in infamy. This is a secondary source and therefore the author was not there when the event happened and cannot tells us all the small details of this event as opposed to the primary document we have encountered before. His purpose is to inform people or rather remind people about Pearl Harbor at the Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Stay in Virginia Beach at a memorial to honor those who lost their lives that day.(suits1) John Suits is a Mass...