The Beliefs Of The Republicans/Nationalists And The Loyalists/Unionists

7539 words - 30 pages

The Beliefs of the Republicans/Nationalists and the Loyalists/Unionists

There are a number of differences between Nationalists and Unionists
and their beliefs. The Nationalists are predominantly Catholic and
they do not want Ireland to be part of Britain. They see the British
as an occupying army and most believe that the British have no right
to be in Ireland, they think it's unfair that the British came into
Ireland in the 1600s and have stayed there. They feel angry about how
the British have persecuted the Catholics in the past, and they
believe that they still don't get treated as well as the Unionists.
They campaign for equal rights in different areas, especially housing
and jobs. Nationalists see Ireland as one place and generally want one
united state, though not all Nationalists want exactly the same thing.

Unionists, on the other hand, are mostly protestant and want to keep
Northern Ireland as part of Britain. Many see themselves as British
instead of Irish and believe they belong to Britain. However,
ancestors of theirs have been in Ireland since the 1600s, so they see
themselves as originating from there and believe it is their homeland.
They also see that the union with Britain is good for them from an
economic point of view. They are outnumbered in Ireland though, and
fear domination by the Catholics so need Britain in many ways to keep
them protected from being overpowered.

In a direct comparison of the two, their general views are the
complete opposite. The Unionists are mostly protestant want to remain
part of Britain. The Nationalists are mostly Catholic and want Ireland
to govern itself, many want Ireland to be united as one free state.
The Unionists see Ireland as their homeland, as their ancestors have
been there since the 1600s, yet still call themselves British. The
Nationalists still feel that the British are an occupying army, and
think its wrong that they are still there. The Unionists also feel
that being part of Britain is good for them economically, whereas the
Nationalists feel they get a bad deal. The Unionists mostly share
their main religion with Britain so feel happy with them, but the
Nationalists feel angry about how the British have treated the
Catholics in the past.

Though these are the two main groups, not everyone that is classed as
a Nationalist or a Unionist feels exactly the same; there are
differences within the sides. Some people are more extreme than others
and some can be more violent. Within the two sides they have different
political parties that have different methods and slightly different
objectives.

On the Nationalist side two notable parties are the SDLP (Social
Democratic Labour Party), lead by John Hume, and Sinn Fein, lead by
Gerry Adams. The SDLP have always been committed to peaceful and
democratic methods,...

Find Another Essay On The Beliefs of the Republicans/Nationalists and the Loyalists/Unionists

Attacking the Economy, republicans. Essay

1371 words - 5 pages simple reason that the economy had faltered. Now whether it was his policies that hurt the economy or Reagan's late 80's deficit reductions that had just taken effect does not matter. The President who is in office at the time of a recession will take the fall. We need to make sure that you succeed in attacking the economy so that you do not suffer the same fate as your father. You do not need and cannot begin to solve the nation's problems in

The Majority Of Texas Voters Are Republicans

653 words - 3 pages , Republican Bob Dole received 48.8% of the votes in Texas while Democrat Bill Clinton received 43.9% of the votes. This was obviously a very close race. And, since Democrats statistically are less likely to vote than Republicans, it may even indicate that there are more (or at least as many) Democrats in Texas as Republicans. Or perhaps it is just that Texas Independents favored Clinton over Dole.The 2000 Election however was not nearly as close

The Beliefs and Life of Heinrich Himmler

648 words - 3 pages -The vast power of Nazi Germany had spread across Europe, across Africa, and east Russia. There had never been such a large ruling empire since the Roman times, by one ruler and his companions. Hitler was in charge of it all, with his fellow rulers at his side; Hermann Göring, Dr Joseph Geobbels, Joachim von Ribbentrop, and Heinrich Himmler. Quoting from a long standing ruler of the Nazi party, Emil Klein; ‘We felt like we ruled the world

Should American citizens during the time of the American Revolution have become Patriots or Loyalists

975 words - 4 pages After the French Indian War, Britain's debt rose to approximately 143,000,000 pounds. Britain also gained from the French; Canada, the Ohio Valley and some Caribbean islands. The new territory the British gained came at far too high a price, for the cost of governing the colonists who inhabited the lands jumped from 7,000 to 35,000 pounds per year. In the past, the British had not been overly aggressive in enforcing laws within the colonies

Should the American colonists have been Patriots or Loyalists?

1083 words - 4 pages Loyalists, a painful and humiliating torture. As one can see, Great Britain protected and defended the colonies, earning the right to impose taxes and laws, and those taxes were fair and beneficial to the colonists - therefore proving that one should be a Loyalist.Great Britain was the mother country of the North American colonies; it protected and defended them with its soldiers and without it, the colonies would not have existed, giving the British

Beliefs of the Anti-Federalists

753 words - 3 pages name, they were called the Nationalists. The Nationalists changed the name to Federalists to show that they were improving the government and were not trying to destroy it. The Federalists were more interested in forming a new government, while the Anti-Federalists wanted to improvise and improve on the Confederation. One argument that the Anti-Federalists had against the forming of a new constitution was that they claimed it would “lead to a

Religious Beliefs of the Ancient Mesopotamians and the Hebrews.

535 words - 2 pages Religious Beliefs of the Ancient Mesopotamians and the HebrewsThe ancient Mesopotamians and the Hebrews had significant differences in their religious beliefs and these differences shaped their societies.Religion was the basis of civilization for the ancient Mesopotamians; it dominated every aspect of their lives. The ancient Mesopotamian society was built upon mythopoeic thinking. This way of thinking based on myths, led them to believe in

The Beliefs of Philosophers and The Belief in God

2161 words - 9 pages motivation I have comes from my beliefs, and what I feel is needed in my life. Life surrounds me with a good and bad environment. Depending on the choice I make, my life can end up in happiness or even failure. As Aristotle says “It is our choice of good or evil that determines our character, not our opinion on good or evil.” (Shields, Christopher) This motivates me, because this quote explains how life can provide me a chances, or opportunities

Bioethics: Understanding the Values and Beliefs of Science and Religion

591 words - 2 pages “Science and Religion, two words differ in meaning but have the same goals, to find the meaning of life and what is life. But which weights more? ” The article tackles about how the religion and science have a clash in terms. How their differences in beliefs and attitudes must judge and appreciate. Bioethics has been born to help science and religion to understand their different lexicons in life. However, even different sectors of religion

Comparing Beliefs and Vaules of the Renaissance and Middle Ages

735 words - 3 pages Comparing Beliefs and Vaules of the Renaissance and Middle Ages There are many contrasts in the beliefs and values of the Renaissance and the Middle Ages. The Middle Ages was a time of great suffering, including famine and widespread disease. The Renaissance, however, was a revival of art, learning, and literature. Their views of the purpose of life in the present world and man's place in the world was, perhaps, the greatest contrast. However

The Al Franken Political Roast: Republicans

2287 words - 10 pages Republicans who didn’t go to war, only adding to the absurdity and disconnect of the GOP. The irony that Franken presents is humorous and thought provoking. Satire is not usually laugh-out-loud funny; it is witty and intended to make people ponder about social institutions and issues in a unique and funny fashion. In order to portray the chickenhawk Republicans in an uproarious visual, Franken composes a parody of a Vietnam mission. The farce

Similar Essays

Lincoln And The Republicans Essay

964 words - 4 pages and had a long road to recovery, the radical republicans wanted to punish the south. They believed that the act of secession by the southern states was treason and the penalties should be strict. Lincoln’s plan was amiable and compassionate. He wanted to unite the states swiftly with little complications, as there was enough for the states to handle. The Confederacy was in disarray with towns destroyed, railroads in ruin, closed factories

The Black Loyalists Essay

1766 words - 7 pages The black loyalists that came to Nova Scotia from the thirteen colonies during the American Revolution were looking for a change in life style and a completely new way of life that was promised to them by the British government, if they took their side during the war, but this new way of life was completely different then what they expected. These black loyalists consisted of both slaved and freed black people. From their arrival in their new

Comparing The Federalists And Republicans Essay

928 words - 4 pages Practice 3.3.2 Comparing the Federalists and Republicans To what extent were the policies of Presidents Jefferson and Madison a departure from those of Federalist Presidents Washington and Adams? The policies of Presidents Jefferson and Madison differed dramatically from those of Presidents Washington and Adams in that they advocated civil and states' rights instead of favoring a strong central government and preferred an agricultural rather

Examining The Issue Of Planned Parenthood Between Republicans And Democrats

1179 words - 5 pages On April 8, 2011, the United States Federal Government nearly shut down because the Democrats and Republicans were struggling to agree upon, among other issues, what to do with Planned Parenthood. The Republicans wanted to stop federal funding for Planned Parenthood, which clearly shows “that they simply don’t care about the health and safety of American women (Planned Parenthood).” The Democrats strongly support Planned Parenthood and were