The United States Constitution is the most important document in history and to our nation. It was signed on the seventeenth day of September in the year of seventeen eighty-seven. It is a governing principle our nation, the foundation of the United States, and it provides structure for the nation and sets limitations on the ruling government as far as the dos’ and donts of their powers. In addition to these many functions, it also informs citizens of their rights. When this document was proposed and later ratified in 1791, the writers of this document named the first ten amendments the “Bill of Rights”. These amendments were called the Bill of Rights due to the belief that these rights were inherited by birth or acquired by being a U.S. citizen.
The U.S. Constitution consists of seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. Of those twenty-seven amendments, there has been controversy over one of the amendments. The controversy is whether or not the second amendment guarantees citizens of the United States the right and protection to keep and/or bear weapons. Some people may raise the question whether or not the second amendment protects an individuals’ right to bear arms or not? If so, is it a federal or state right to bear arms? What is the purpose of the second amendment, and does it create a conflict with the National Firearms Act and other gun control laws that were created to mitigate violence? However, the most important question is would there be more or less crimes in the world if this amendment had not been written?
The second amendment does give an individual the right to bear arms. Amendment two states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” However, as far the right being entitled to the federal government or solely to the state is a tricky question. In the second amendment it says “being necessary to the security of a free state”, in other words a citizen of the state can possess a weapon if the state is a free state due to having a militia for the protection of the state in time of conflict.
For example, consider the Guard and Reserve components of the U.S. Armed Forces branches. Are those components not put in place for the protection from an organized military in each state? The United States is the nation with the most powerful armed force. In contrast, could one protect themselves from their own government? No, this is the purpose of the second amendment for the citizens to be armed at a level that was equal to their government. Now, the Constitution in which the second amendment is a part of is a governing document for the nation so, could it be considered both federal and state? There may not be enough evidentiary support to answer this question; however it should be taken into consideration that both federal and state apply because the state laws fall under the regulation of federal law.
There will always be a...