The British Monarchy Essay

1042 words - 4 pages

The British Monarchy

Nowadays, some scandals and salacious gossip that surrounded the
royals seriously undermined the symbolism of the constitutional
monarchy, which indirectly influenced the current political situation.

The issue to be discussed, as to if the advantages of the UK having a
constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages boils down
to one fundamental question: if the present system of the government
of the UK adapt to the present society? My answer is: no. In this
essay, I will look at the two ideas and appropriate my answer.

The constitutional monarchy: an impartial symbolic head of state, and
always acts on the advice of minister, especially of prime minister,
i.e. the monarch reigns, but does not rule. In theory, the monarch has
other prerogative such as appointment and dismissal of the Prime
Minister; opening and dissolving of parliament, the veto of
legislation, ect. Additionally, the monarch enjoys "the right to be
consulted, the right to encourage and the right to warn".

Clearly, the powers which the monarch now exercises are more
theoretical than real, but we still have our queen in Britain.

The supporters would say our queen is an impartial head of state, as a
symbol of national unity and continuity. Yes, she is, and so was the
monarchs before 1707. Why did we change the absolute monarchy into a
constitutional monarchy? Is it better? From the medias, we always see
a harmony, close, happy family as a fine model, and we thought our
queen and other royals love each other very well, but is it true? Let
us think about the death of Diana, princess of Wales. Even if Diana
divorced with Prince of Wales, she still was a royal member. When the
news of the death of Diana speeded, the queen and many royals were
indifferen to it, just as Diana was a stranger. People would ask:
where is the model of family? Where are the close family members? What
we saw is thousands of people cry for the death of Diana, thousands of
people take flowers to mourn Diana, but they are not relatives of
Diana. People disappoint to the queen and other royals.

Other supporters would say the pomp and ceremony of royals pageantry
is good for tourism and increases the revenue of the government. Maybe
it is true. However, if there are not a queen and other royals, will
the visitors not go to Britain? I think visitors are more interested
in old castles, churches and other sceneries than some person. If we
need to put some people who look like royals in castles or halls, we
can ask for some actors instead, and it will be cheaper. We just...

Find Another Essay On The British Monarchy

British Monarchy Essay

952 words - 4 pages The British public’s view on the monarchy has changed tremendously over the past two centuries. Because of this, the monarchy’s social and political roles have been steadily declining. The reasons behind this are the Great Reform Bill of 1832, growing political parties, and the actions of the Royal Family. To begin, in 1830, William IV became king of Britian. Many events through William’s time as the king made it so that the monarchy lost power

The Monarchy In Canada Essay

891 words - 4 pages A monarchy is a form of government in which a single individual holds all the power in government. Since 1918 Britain has been governed in a Democratic system but held a lot of the same customs that it had when it was a monarchy (like a royal family etc.). Canada was a part of the British Monarchy when it was still around and unfortunately is still a part of the monarchy system that remains in Britain today. In 1867 the British North America

The Benefits of the UK Having a Constitutional Monarchy

2003 words - 8 pages of 'democracy' we can rely on!¡¯[viii] Without the monarchy, I am afraid that British citizens cannot enjoy any democratic rights. Meanwhile, monarchy takes part in many charitable activities. According to the report: ¡®The Queen and other members of the Royal Family have close associations with a wide range of charitable organisations covering many areas of national life. As patrons of over 3,200 charities, the Royal

Monarchies: From the Ancient World to Today

790 words - 4 pages Islamic countries. Monarchies were once the ideal form of government in ancient times, but have lost their presence in modern day society. In the world we live in religion is not a part of government, as it is in a monarchy, there is not much of a place for monarchies to exist. There are five different types of monarchies in our modern day world. There is an absolute monarchy where all power is vested in one person in an absolute form. In a British

slgjk hsdfl;g j sdl; ishfl sd r sdf sdfujh - grade 11 xd - essay

606 words - 3 pages Naveen Srisubakaran CHA3U1 Mr. Demaray Sept 28 2017 How Did the Patriots Justify Their Separation from Great Britain? The Americans justified their disloyalty to her monarchy, Great Britain, on the basis of unjust treatment and economic discrimination. In addition, they believed that the British rule inhibited their sense of liberty. The Patriots constantly felt an ever-growing restriction on their rights as a colony, embodied by the paranoia of

Monarchy

2079 words - 8 pages they have too many intern differences -they are composed of different "nations"- (Aragon, p.11-19).An especial case of parliamentary monarchy could be the United Kingdom with the Commonwealth11 that maintain the continuity of the old British Empire, coopering between them and maintaining a common head of the state, the Queen Elisabeth II.To summarize, the parliamentary monarchy present arguments in favor and contra. By one side, the monarchy is

Boy 21

579 words - 2 pages . Montesquieu was a philosophe who was born into a family of nobles. Montesquieu had a strong belief in separation of powers. One of Montesquieu famous work is The Sprit of Laws. Montesquieu compared three governments. The governments he compared were Republic, Monarchy and Despotism. Montesquieu loved how the British set up a Constitutional monarchy but with different branches. The English government is spilt in a legislative, branch, and judicial

"The Constitutional Monarchy and Absolutism" --Improvements: Im not particularly a good closer. So a more elaborate conclusion could be in order...depending on what your specific question is

1648 words - 7 pages --Overview: Reviews the Glorious Revolution, and states how the Constitutional Monarchy came to be, and how it differed from Absolutism.The Constitutional Monarchy and AbsolutismCharles the First was sympathetic to Catholicism. He believed in the divine right of the monarchy. The Puritan influence in the U.K was rising. Parliament and the rising commercial class were having many conflicts and disagreements with the monarchy. The Parliament, an

The queen

538 words - 2 pages monarchy behaves , as the apex of the British class system We seldom see portrayals that are free from bias especially when the subjects are as famous and influential as the Queen and her family . But the events that catapulted them into the public eye may have relieved them of their tight bond to maintain their feelings to themselves Diana 's death has given us glimpses into their private lives which the Queen vehemently tried to seclude her family

The queen

538 words - 2 pages monarchy behaves , as the apex of the British class system We seldom see portrayals that are free from bias especially when the subjects are as famous and influential as the Queen and her family . But the events that catapulted them into the public eye may have relieved them of their tight bond to maintain their feelings to themselves Diana 's death has given us glimpses into their private lives which the Queen vehemently tried to seclude her family

The Rise of Democracy in Great Britain

1183 words - 5 pages think for themselves. Both the church and the monarchy did not allow people to have their own ideas or to express their opinion. Kings had absolute control over everything from increasing taxes to imposing a religion on their people. Everyone within the British kingdom was suppressed to think like the king and live for the king. There were only two kinds of people during this time, there were those who were nobles and enjoyed the good life since

Similar Essays

The British Monarchy Under Stress Essay

1870 words - 7 pages The British Monarchy Under Stress: A Political Inquiry The British Monarchy has long been a subject of great reverence as well as much debate in Great Britain. The current reigning monarch is Queen Elizabeth II, who inherited the crown from her father, King George VI, in 1953. Her role in the United Kingdom is that of Head of State who also "acts as a focus of national unity" (www.royal.gov.uk). Often times, her role is perceived

Should The British Monarchy Be Abolished?

972 words - 4 pages In 1603 the Scottish and English monarchies were united and at the beginning of the eighteenth century, the monarchy of the United Kingdom was deprived of the decision-making privilege they once had. For the purpose of this essay, I intend to examine the many different arguments both for and against the British monarchy being abolished. Proponents argue strongly that the monarchy symbolises all that is British throughout Britain and the

Roles Of The British Monarchy: Existent, Relevant, And Important

1614 words - 6 pages A king, queen, or monarch is often seen as a figure of absolute power with control over taxation, the military, religion, finances, and foreign policy. However, the British monarchy only retains a small portion of these powers; the retention of these powers remains mainly symbolic. The idea of absolute monarchal power describes more accurately the Tudor dynasty of the past than the Windsor family of today. The British Monarchy, despite its

Critical Reflection On The Hidden Influence Of The British Monarchy On Politics

2080 words - 9 pages real power that the British –constitutional- monarchy holds over public employees. Since the limitation of powers of the Crown in the XVII century the royals have been using their forceful influence in an unofficial way for their own benefit (Adams, 2010; Booth 2010 and 2011; Wilson, 1989). Taking into account that the United Kingdom has a democratic and constitutional political system, some serious questions arise from this: how the monarchy has