This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Burden Of Proof In English Criminal Law

2418 words - 10 pages

In Criminal cases, the general principle is that when it comes to proving the guilt of an accused person, the burden of proving this rests with the prosecution . In the case of Woolmington v DPP , it was stated in the judgment of Lord Sankey that; “Throughout the web of the English Criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner’s guilt subject to….. the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception”. From the Judgment of Lord Sankey, the following circumstances where the accused bears the legal burden of proof in criminal cases were established; where the accused pleads the defence of insanity, where a statute or Act of Parliament expressly imposes the legal burden of proof on the defence, and where a statute or Act of Parliament impliedly imposes the legal burden of proof on the defence. An accused person will also bear the legal burden of proof of the statutory defence of diminished responsibility which is covered by section 2(2) Homicide Act 1957. In the cases of Lambert Ali and Jordan , the Court of Appeal held that imposing the legal burden of proof of proving diminished responsibility on the defence does not infringe Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
In relation to the express statutory exceptions to the general rule which is also known as ‘Reverse Onus Provisions’, i.e. one of the circumstances where an accused person bears the legal burden of proof in a criminal case, there is a possibility of these provisions falling foul of or being incompatible with Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights which provides that; ‘Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according law’. This presumption is the foundation of the general rule stated earlier that the prosecution bears the legal burden of proof to prove the defendant’s guilt of the offence beyond reasonable doubt . The problem that this creates is that the courts are faced with some difficulty in implementing a reverse onus because section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that it is unlawful to act in a way that is incompatible with a Convention right.
It is however possible for a court faced with a problem of incompatibility to avoid it, if it can interpret the legislation so as to impose only an evidential burden and not a legal burden on the defendant .It may also be possible for a court to use its power under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 to ‘read down’ the legal burden to an evidential burden.
In the case of R v Lambert , which involved an offence under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and section 28(3) of the Act stated that the defendant had to prove on the balance of probabilities that he was not aware of the nature of what he possessed . The House of Lords in construing Article 6 ECHR in relation to the reverse onus provison held that Article 6 would now require that the Misuse of Drugs Act be read so...

Find Another Essay On The Burden of Proof in English Criminal Law

Burden Of Proof Essay

4597 words - 18 pages therein was a mere question of fact. Before the supreme court the appellant contended inter alias that that the high court had failed to formulate the substantial question of law involved in the case as to whether the burden of proof was on the plaintiff the husband to prove non access to his wife was as heavy as the burden of prosecution to prove in a criminal case the guilt of the accused. Dismissing the appeal the Supreme Court held.Normally

"Throughout web of English criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that is a duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt". Woolmington v. DPP (1935) Viscount Shanley

1616 words - 6 pages higher standard applies in the criminal law, where guilt must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt."Proof beyond reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond the shadow of doubt..."#A conviction cannot be sustained even if the prosecution story considered as a whole 'may be true' until it is found that it 'must be true'. But between 'may be true and must be true' are big distinction, and the whole of this distinction must be covered by legal

The Burden of Proof in the Case of Darling vs. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital

866 words - 4 pages award to plaintiff. Legalities of Medical Malpractice The system of law governing the resolution of civil disputes between parties in the United States is referred to as the adversarial system, where respective advocates for each side in a dispute skillfully present arguments before an impartial party, such as jury or judge. The adversarial system is used in common law countries to resolve disputes related to negligent conduct, whether medical

Criminal Law in the News

917 words - 4 pages Criminal Law in the NewsI chose to use an article that I received from This article is about how there are 15 states that have enacted laws that expands the right of self defense back in 2006.According to the Liptak, the supporters of this law call them "stand your ground" laws and the opponents call them "shoot first" laws. There have been many so called self defense shootings that were not self

The Importance of Criminal Investigation in the Law Enforcement

713 words - 3 pages information that would otherwise be unable to gather from law enforcement personnel. However, many of these informants are criminals associated with the crime being investigated Criminal investigation may be a terribly troublesome and dangerous operation of police work. Once a criminal offense happens, a police officer goes to the scene of the crime, gathers information, and searches for for the potential suspects. If in case, there are

The Burden of Intelligence

2433 words - 10 pages in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress due to anxiety and the milder forms of depression in young adults” (Stumm). Those with higher intelligence, maybe, suffer from more mental illnesses and ailments. Throughout time, there have been numerous examples of gifted individuals who have suffered in life due to their deeper comprehension of the universe. It seems that though people, like Solomon and Stephen Hawking, have been gifted

The History of English Common Law in Hong Kong

833 words - 3 pages General BackgroundFor general background, when we talk about the English Law, we must have to mention Norman Conquest in 1066, 1066 is a very important year in the law history.Before the Norman Conquest, life was governed by the customary law. However, different places have different customary rules, each place has its own court and its customary rule was enforced. After the Norman Conquest, the Kings of England slowly gained control over the

The Consensus Theory of Criminal Law

870 words - 3 pages itself. The notion of acceptable behavior needs to be set and established by society itself. If an individual crosses that acceptable line, then punishment is in order. This is a way for society to limit and control crime. Laws are deemed to normalize and make society function in an orderly manner. The conflict view of criminal law establishes that laws were made by the elite and powerful influential individuals, in such

Addressing the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in India

2133 words - 9 pages Landscape Assessment: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is a major health concern for India and her people. India has experienced a steady rise in the burden of CVD, with a six- to eight-fold increase in the prevalence of CVD over the past four decades. Currently, CVD is the leading cause of death in India, with around 28% of deaths attributed to vascular disease. CVD affects both rural and urban populations alike. Among adults, the estimated

In Hong Kong, Medical burden of an aging population affect the extent of the economic burden of the younger generation?

1200 words - 5 pages decreases the development of Hong Kong as government need to spend more money to care the elderly.  Most of the families are nuclear family. The younger will work outside and structure a new family, so elder will living solitary. Elder cannot take care of themselves in daily life. When people become elder, the chance of illness will increase. It will increase the weight of medical burden on workforce. Political perspectives  First, current

The Roles of the Main Players in A Canadian Criminal Law Case

1146 words - 5 pages The role of a judge is to preside over trials in our courts of law while exercising the virtues of integrity, impartiality and independence. It is the duty of a judge to uphold the rule of law to ensure equal treatment of everyone in pursuit of justice. A judge must also uphold the principles of the Canadian Constitution to protect the rights of individual citizens, as well as to guarantee that Canadian legislation does not exceed its boundaries

Similar Essays

Exploration Of English Criminal Law Essay

2755 words - 11 pages several duties of care? Certainly, one of the bases of English Common Law is that punishment for doing nothing is repugnant - action creates consequence, inaction should not. Should this apply? Professor A. Ashworth certainly thought it should be changed, publishing a report entitled 'The Scope of Criminal Liability for Omissions' and calling for reform. However, there are several points to consider. The first concerns itself

Criminal And Civil Law In The English Legal System

1893 words - 8 pages impact on society itself. For example: a murder, theft or rape. Criminal law is dealt with in the Magistrates court and if very serious in the Crown court. It is said to be more difficult to win a case in the Magistrates court and Crown court than in a civil court as in a magistrates and crown court the evidence has to be proved beyond doubt and in a civil court evidence can be proved on a balance of probabilities

Learning Criminal Law And English Common Law

1034 words - 5 pages On this first week I learned so much about how criminal law is evaluated, organized, and made. Also I learned about the English common law includes legislation, and a multitude of other legal norms that help on the evaluation of criminal laws, such as federal and state constitutions that are based on congress and state legislatures. It also includes how the lawmakers are made or changed by the judicial powers of review and how the judicial

Who Bears The Burden Of Proof In Tax Litigation

3057 words - 13 pages evidence shifts to the other party. The party initially assigned the burden of persuasion still has the ultimate burden in doing so. The burden of proof does not apply to legal arguments and relates only to facts. Without regard to any presumption questions of law are decided. The burden issue does not arise when all facts are stipulated in Tax Court cases. In civil litigation the standard of proof is either proof by a preponderance of the