The Burden Of Proof In English Criminal Law

2418 words - 10 pages

In Criminal cases, the general principle is that when it comes to proving the guilt of an accused person, the burden of proving this rests with the prosecution . In the case of Woolmington v DPP , it was stated in the judgment of Lord Sankey that; “Throughout the web of the English Criminal law one golden thread is always to be seen, that is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner’s guilt subject to….. the defence of insanity and subject also to any statutory exception”. From the Judgment of Lord Sankey, the following circumstances where the accused bears the legal burden of proof in criminal cases were established; where the accused pleads the defence of insanity, where a statute or Act of Parliament expressly imposes the legal burden of proof on the defence, and where a statute or Act of Parliament impliedly imposes the legal burden of proof on the defence. An accused person will also bear the legal burden of proof of the statutory defence of diminished responsibility which is covered by section 2(2) Homicide Act 1957. In the cases of Lambert Ali and Jordan , the Court of Appeal held that imposing the legal burden of proof of proving diminished responsibility on the defence does not infringe Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
In relation to the express statutory exceptions to the general rule which is also known as ‘Reverse Onus Provisions’, i.e. one of the circumstances where an accused person bears the legal burden of proof in a criminal case, there is a possibility of these provisions falling foul of or being incompatible with Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights which provides that; ‘Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according law’. This presumption is the foundation of the general rule stated earlier that the prosecution bears the legal burden of proof to prove the defendant’s guilt of the offence beyond reasonable doubt . The problem that this creates is that the courts are faced with some difficulty in implementing a reverse onus because section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 provides that it is unlawful to act in a way that is incompatible with a Convention right.
It is however possible for a court faced with a problem of incompatibility to avoid it, if it can interpret the legislation so as to impose only an evidential burden and not a legal burden on the defendant .It may also be possible for a court to use its power under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 to ‘read down’ the legal burden to an evidential burden.
In the case of R v Lambert , which involved an offence under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and section 28(3) of the Act stated that the defendant had to prove on the balance of probabilities that he was not aware of the nature of what he possessed . The House of Lords in construing Article 6 ECHR in relation to the reverse onus provison held that Article 6 would now require that the Misuse of Drugs Act be read so...

Find Another Essay On The Burden of Proof in English Criminal Law

The Importance of Criminal Investigation in the Law Enforcement

713 words - 3 pages information that would otherwise be unable to gather from law enforcement personnel. However, many of these informants are criminals associated with the crime being investigated Criminal investigation may be a terribly troublesome and dangerous operation of police work. Once a criminal offense happens, a police officer goes to the scene of the crime, gathers information, and searches for for the potential suspects. If in case, there are

The Burden of Intelligence Essay

2433 words - 10 pages in childhood is a risk factor for psychological distress due to anxiety and the milder forms of depression in young adults” (Stumm). Those with higher intelligence, maybe, suffer from more mental illnesses and ailments. Throughout time, there have been numerous examples of gifted individuals who have suffered in life due to their deeper comprehension of the universe. It seems that though people, like Solomon and Stephen Hawking, have been gifted

The Consensus Theory of Criminal Law

870 words - 3 pages itself. The notion of acceptable behavior needs to be set and established by society itself. If an individual crosses that acceptable line, then punishment is in order. This is a way for society to limit and control crime. Laws are deemed to normalize and make society function in an orderly manner. The conflict view of criminal law establishes that laws were made by the elite and powerful influential individuals, in such

Addressing the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in India

2133 words - 9 pages Landscape Assessment: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is a major health concern for India and her people. India has experienced a steady rise in the burden of CVD, with a six- to eight-fold increase in the prevalence of CVD over the past four decades. Currently, CVD is the leading cause of death in India, with around 28% of deaths attributed to vascular disease. CVD affects both rural and urban populations alike. Among adults, the estimated

The Roles of the Main Players in A Canadian Criminal Law Case

1146 words - 5 pages The role of a judge is to preside over trials in our courts of law while exercising the virtues of integrity, impartiality and independence. It is the duty of a judge to uphold the rule of law to ensure equal treatment of everyone in pursuit of justice. A judge must also uphold the principles of the Canadian Constitution to protect the rights of individual citizens, as well as to guarantee that Canadian legislation does not exceed its boundaries

The History of English Common Law in Hong Kong

833 words - 3 pages General BackgroundFor general background, when we talk about the English Law, we must have to mention Norman Conquest in 1066, 1066 is a very important year in the law history.Before the Norman Conquest, life was governed by the customary law. However, different places have different customary rules, each place has its own court and its customary rule was enforced. After the Norman Conquest, the Kings of England slowly gained control over the

Strict Liability in Criminal Law

2066 words - 8 pages criminal law is to prevent ‘socially damaging activities’. In support of this, it is suggested by Elliot and Quinn (Criminal Law, 2000, p.32) that- ‘It would be absurd to turn a blind eye to those who cause harm due to carelessness, negligence or even an accident’. This approach appears to be stringent. One might be inclined to suggest that accident is part of human nature, and in applying strict liability to even the

History of Criminal Law from the Roman Justice

4665 words - 19 pages capable to carry through social justice, however without disdaining the individual. In fact, the modern Criminal law has for function the security of the social life and the existence human being, without another one or one preference. After the iluminista ideário, the Right started to also exert the function of garantista of the human Rights. As Legaz y Lacambra teaches to L. .".. person has constituently social nature. The person idea implies

Criminal Law, Criminal Careers, and the Criminal Justice System

2544 words - 10 pages "America imprisons 756 inmates per 100,000 residents, a rate nearly five times the world's average. About one in every 31 adults in this country is in jail or on supervised release. Either we are the most evil people on earth or we are doing something very wrong." (Webb, 2009, p. 4) This paper will look at basic criminal law, the reasons for lives of crime, a brief outline of the modern criminal justice system, and its future.Criminal

Criminal Conspiracy in Historical Common Law

1371 words - 5 pages Criminal Conspiracy in Historical Common Law The law of conspiracy is considerably more complex and uncertain than it need be because the statutory reform of the area largely contained in Part I of the criminal law Act 1977 was only partial. As a result, there are now two types of conspiracy – statutory conspiracies governed by the 1977 Act, and an important but limited range of common law conspiracies, which were expressly retained by the act

Overview of the Process of Law Reform in the English Legal System

2408 words - 10 pages The intention of this essay is to explain the process of law reform within the English legal system. The way in which the activity of parliament and that of the judiciary affects the way in which laws are reformed in the UK will be also discussed. The common law system in the UK means that the UK's primary legal principles have been developed by the judiciary rather than by parliament. However, as parliamentary sovereignty is an important

Similar Essays

Burden Of Proof Essay

4597 words - 18 pages therein was a mere question of fact. Before the supreme court the appellant contended inter alias that that the high court had failed to formulate the substantial question of law involved in the case as to whether the burden of proof was on the plaintiff the husband to prove non access to his wife was as heavy as the burden of prosecution to prove in a criminal case the guilt of the accused. Dismissing the appeal the Supreme Court held.Normally

Exploration Of English Criminal Law Essay

2755 words - 11 pages several duties of care? Certainly, one of the bases of English Common Law is that punishment for doing nothing is repugnant - action creates consequence, inaction should not. Should this apply? Professor A. Ashworth certainly thought it should be changed, publishing a report entitled 'The Scope of Criminal Liability for Omissions' and calling for reform. However, there are several points to consider. The first concerns itself

Criminal And Civil Law In The English Legal System

1893 words - 8 pages impact on society itself. For example: a murder, theft or rape. Criminal law is dealt with in the Magistrates court and if very serious in the Crown court. It is said to be more difficult to win a case in the Magistrates court and Crown court than in a civil court as in a magistrates and crown court the evidence has to be proved beyond doubt and in a civil court evidence can be proved on a balance of probabilities

Criminal Law In The News Essay

917 words - 4 pages Criminal Law in the NewsI chose to use an article that I received from www.nytimes.com/2006/08/07/us/07shoot.html. This article is about how there are 15 states that have enacted laws that expands the right of self defense back in 2006.According to the Liptak, the supporters of this law call them "stand your ground" laws and the opponents call them "shoot first" laws. There have been many so called self defense shootings that were not self