The Cia Shouldn't Pursue Drone Program

1374 words - 5 pages

After 9/11 George W. Bush signed documents that gave the C.I.A the right to kill or capture any terrorist anywhere in the world. They could use lethal force against anyone that was a suspect to a national security threat calling it “anticipatory” self-defense and being released of its legal constraints by classifying terrorism as an act of war rather than a crime. This was a glove’s off response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. America’s emotions were running high. They were hurt, angry, and out for revenge. According to the September 2001 Gallup poll, George Bush’s approval rating was 90% throughout the nation. Needless to say, the nation backed this guerrilla counter attack. The United States announced a war on terrorism, using different weapons and tactics to help destroy Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. The MQ-1 Predator drone would make it’s appearance and change the way we fight terrorism forever. Jane Mayer, a distinguished writer for The New Yorker, explains, “The Predator program is described by many in the intelligence world as America’s single most effective weapon against Al Qaeda.” (2009). The C.I.A had its hand on a weapon that was less expensive than putting soldiers on the ground, no risk of soldier death, cameras that made pinpoint accuracy possible, and the ability to kill anyone they wish with a push of a button. This was an ideal weapon that would be used to dismantle high profile terrorist leaders. But what happens when such a secretive organization, like the C.I.A, is in control of such a powerful weapon with the authority to do whatever it takes to kill the bad guys? This gives them power to decide whether someone lives or dies based on intelligence they acquire. There is no due process, no judge present, and no innocent until proven guilty. If one finds his or her name on “the kill list,” they will have a hell-fire missile sent to their location, end of story. This makes ground for a moral and legal dilemma. What constitutes someone making his or hers way onto that dreadful list? How many civilian casualties have been lost because of drone strikes? Does the intelligence acquired warrant a death sentence? Who is sentencing these individuals? These are all questions that American citizens should be asking. Mayer goes on to state that, “The program is classified as covert, and the intelligence agency declines to provide any information to the public about where it operates, how it selects targets, who is in charge, or how many people have been killed.” (2009). The program needs to be handed over to the Department Of Defense; so the targeted killings can be made public, therefore bringing about more transparency with-in the program. This change would also put far more legal constraints on the drone attacks, minimizing civilian casualties and strengthening political bonds with Middle East governments.
“The U.S. government runs two drone programs. The military’s version, which is publicly...

Find Another Essay On The CIA Shouldn't Pursue Drone Program

Drones and IHL Essay

3226 words - 13 pages same span of time? . There have been policies implemented that create what would appear to be pure civilian casualties. In the absence of concrete information, we need to rely on media ac-counts, and tracking organizations, which can unreliable as well. The CIA administers the drone program for the US and employs the following policies that add to civilian deaths. In many instances, the CIA uses a “Double Tap”- CIA is deliberately targeting

Drone attacks and it’s legal and moral battle

1428 words - 6 pages place on October 24th 2012, when Bibi was killed in her field. The United States has neither denied nor accepted these accusations of CIA initiated drone strikes. Making one consider the morality of these actions. One must question the legality and immorality of drone strikes in order to justify them. Ben Emerson, a counterterrorism official for the UN stated: “The position of the government of Pakistan is quite clear: It does not consent to the

Drone Warfare

1340 words - 5 pages right to life, as well as other international laws or rights. They say that the amount of civilians killed in these drone strikes makes the use of drones a war crime. They also claim that the governments global war on terror is being used as an excuse to kill people. The people who are for drone warfare would be government organizations like the CIA, NSA and the military; these groups see the uses of drone warfare. Also, there companies like

Technology

2649 words - 11 pages Drone Technology Living in the digital age where we enjoy the various fruits of latest technological tools and advancements, then at the same time we cannot escape from their hidden or apparent harms. Also, it is a fact that some gadgets supported by these technological advancements are much capable to bring destruction and disaster then construction and convenience. The same goes for the Drone Technology which since past 200 years is being used

Drones

712 words - 3 pages unmentioned stealth missions. Because drone strikes add collateral damage, it has become necessary, from now on, to reduce the further usage of drones and halt drone-technology from advancing. After researching upon this controversial issue and considering both extremes of the spectrum, it has become very important for us Americans to understand and take action against this new menace. Although UAVs were being secretly being tested in the 90s by the CIA

policy

2024 words - 9 pages Use of Military Force, Congress can implement another Act, in accordance with the Drone Policy, that allows the US government to pursue all threats (including those of (9/11). This new act, however, would apply international human rights law to all US military applications concerning terrorism regardless of location. This would ensure that the US is still enforcing its “inherent right to self-defense” and complying with International Law. The

Drone Warfare

2064 words - 9 pages that drone attacks kill too many innocent people. Since 2008, U.S. drones has killed 67 civilians. A Pakistani Foreign Minister states that “At least 400 civilians had been killed by U.S. drone strikes in the country since the attacks started in 2004.” Of the 400 civilians that had been killed, almost 200 of them had been children. U.S. Military is wrong to rely too heavily on it’s drone program. Critics of drones argue that people will

Government Surveillance vs Privacy

1620 words - 6 pages Hightower mentions that Obama recently promoted John Brennan to the head of the CIA. Brennan, Hightower says, is the “architect of this high-tech [drone] kill policy.” Therefore, with the promotion of a man whom Hightower claims is responsible for the idea of domestic drone surveillance, Hightower is called to immediately give his speech act in broad opposition of domestic drone surveillance. There seems to be no better time to pre-emptively write

Bluebird, Artichocke are they real programs?

1303 words - 5 pages -name MKULTRA. Concerned about rumors of communist brainwashing of POWs* during the Korean War, in April1953 CIA director Allen Dulles authorized the MKULTRA program, which would later become notorious for the unusual and sometimes inhumane tests that CIA financed.In 1953, Project Artichoke evolved into Project MKULTRA, the project had grown out of an earlier secret program know as Bluebird that was officially formed to counter Soviet advances in

CIA Operational Psychology

2678 words - 11 pages Operational Psychologist position in the Central Intelligence Agency is a PhD or a PsyD in Psychology. An individual must also have at least two years of post doctoral work experience have must have completed an APA-approved graduate program or internship (CIA). In the state of North Carolina, every state university offers a Bachelor of Science or Art Degree in Psychology. In order to declare Psychology as a major at East Carolina University, a

administrations are quite similar

777 words - 4 pages policies of one administration are simple continued by the other. The problem is that the allegation is a generalization and the varying policies must be studied separately on their own merits as to whether they are related or not. NB: I would like to state a couple of points on the CIA’s drone operations. The CIA is not limited by war zones and is sanctioned to conduct covert operations in any area that is considered significant. Moreover, the

Similar Essays

Drone Persuasive Essay

2038 words - 8 pages ever have been able to before. The use of drones as a military weapon first began in February of 2002 when the CIA sent an unmanned predator drone overseas to Afghanistan aiming for Osama Bin Laden. Although the mission was a failure, ever since then the use of drones has been evolving and has now become a revolutionary asset to the armed forces. Drones are now providing our military with endless amounts of capabilities and extraordinary

Test Essay

997 words - 4 pages the main point Friedersdorf makes is to reform the drone program the argument that Friedersdorf makes of having checks on the ability of “a future president who starts malignantly abusing the extraordinary, secret, unaccountable powers the executive branch is currently permitted” is a more flamboyant argument that he can elaborate on. However, elaborating on this subject may cause a shift in focus from drones to whether the president crossed a

The Legitimacy Of U.S. Drone Strikes

1899 words - 8 pages dispute occurs when discussing the legitimacy of the US drone strike under jus ad bellum. When addressing this problem, it is important to investigate whether two particular requirements of jus ad bellum, the necessity of the force and the proportion of the force, is satisfied (Sterio, 2012). However, “Because the CIA operates the drone program in Pakistan in secrecy, it is impossible to determine conclusively whether the program meets the

Is Targeted Killing Justified? Essay

1215 words - 5 pages strategy. According to the New American Foundation, drone strikes are on the rise with an estimated 291 attacks in Pakistan alone since 2009. Prior to 2013, the majority of drone attacks were conducted by the paramilitary arm of the Central Intelligence Agency. However, in an effort to promote transparency and openness about the program, the Department of Defense has begun to initiate many of the drone strikes. In addition to drone strikes, the