The Cloning Debate
Not so far in the future, a young boy of the age of six, dying a heart-wrenching death, will only be able survive with a bone marrow transplant. His parents will have searched near and far for a match, but none will come to their aid. The only possible way that they can produce a perfect match for their son's bone marrow is to clone their son. Unfortunately, at this time this topic is still being discussed and debated upon with the government. Their only child that has been their treasure for six years might die. A clone of their son becomes their apple of aspiration to keep the treasure from being buried.
With a scenario as presented above, cloning might seem like the answer to hundreds of lives taken at the expense of uncontrollable forces. But is there another side to the story? Isn't there always? Professor Kevin Williams of Georgetown University is still depicting the ambiguity of this topic when he states, "Like Adam and Eve, we want to be God, to be in control. The question is, what are the limits?" (U.S. News World Report). Making an identical copy of another human being is a rather drastic move, a move that in most people's eyes can only be carried through by God. Some deem that cloning would put us in the shoes of God. They believe that instead of God creating life, we would. Some professors beg to differ, like David Fletcher of Wheaton College in Wheaton, IL who argues, "It is still only God who creates life."
Perhaps cloning is not the answer and our society should leave reproduction up to the natural ways. But then one must ask themselves the question of 'why not'. Is there some horrible outcome that will back fire due to the aberrant ways of creating a child? Is bringing another soul into this world a sin? If it is not natural, yes, some do believe that it is a crime against humanity (Address and Vitae) Rabbi Richard Address makes his view apparent when claiming, "[Cloning] is an area where we cannot go. It violates the mystery of what it means to be human." Along with Jewish leaders, Protestant theologians think cloning of humans would 'cross the line' (Herbert). Others agree with him when they think that cloning violates, "the dignity both of human procreation and the conjugal union." (Vitae). Is the idea of cloning homo sapiens too surreal and abstract or should it become an everyday activity? Are we stepping in God's shoes when we should not be or are we not stepping up to our calling? Would cloning make us God?
Another major issue concerning cloning is the fact that clones would definitely face a different lifestyle than the rest of us. Some philosophers believe that the difficulties that clones would face would be different than the ones we do but not to a higher degree. Everyone is born with some future hardships in their life so it wouldn't be any different for a clone (Wachbroit). However, he also believes that there could be distinct differences between a...