Taking into account of the recent shooting sprees, the gun control debate has started again. However, people have contemplated: “Why does America need gun laws” and “Why are so many states disagreeing about the restrictions that need to be put in place for civilians looking to purchase firearms.” The reasoning for such contemplation is that the fluxuating strictness of gun laws have led to several incidences within states that have strict gun laws due to the fact that the perpetrators of these incidences have purchased their firearms either from black markets, or states where the severity of gun control is at minimal levels.
One of the most important aspects of the debate centered on gun legislature is the distribution of illegal firearms to felons, criminals and American youth. Witemute’s article hints that there have been several illegal gun sales from unauthorized markets and to those under the legal ages of 18 or 21 depending on the type of firearm being sold. Unfortunately, these illegal sales have resulted in an increase in gun related injuries and deaths. (55)
Another aspect of this debate is in fact, the lobbyists that are pushing for more lenient or tighter gun-laws. It seems that the lobbyists that wanted stricter firearm-related laws are the ones who have witnessed the damage that criminals and the mentally unstable can really do with a gun in their hand. Those pushing for leniency when it comes to gun legislature state that firearms are trying to protect their right to carry an essential tool for those who want to venture the countryside in search for animals to shoot down for food, clothing or sport. The last aspects of the controversy are the federal and state laws that have decided whether or not concealed weapons are either legal or illegal, along with the laws that could potentially violate the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. These laws would happen to fluxuate between lenient and strict depending on the current events of a specific country or nation.
Determining a person’s stability is by analyzing their mental condition through a series of tests that either permits or deny the purchase of a single firearm to the civilian in question. Having experiences with unstable feelings and emotions over trivial things would cause someone to fail one of the tests, thus sabotaging their mental stability and branding them unstable. However if a person has not suffered a mental illness, nor overwhelming stress that leads to mental instability, the person will be considered stable enough to purchase a firearm.
Law-abiding is the status of a civilian who whole heartedly complies with the laws of a governing body. It is obvious that when a civilian doesn’t want to break the law, he or she would want to remain as safe as possible. This description would typically apply to everyday workers such as store clerks, lawyers, and even security guards who understand and abide by the laws of a specific state and even the laws of the...