This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Consensus Perspective Essay

1058 words - 4 pages

Criminologists have long tried to fight crime and they have developed many theories along the way as tools to help them understand criminals. In the process of doing so, criminologist have realized that in order to really understand why criminals are criminals, they had to first understand the interrelationship between the law and society. A clear and thorough understanding of how they relatively connect with criminal behavior is necessary. Therefore, they then created three analytical perspectives which would help them tie the dots between social order and law, the consensus, the pluralist and the conflict perspectives. Each provides a significantly different view of society as relative to the law. However, while they all aim to the same exact purpose which is to help us understand crimes from a social viewpoint, the consensus perspective is more effective as it presents a more radical and logical view of how society interacts with the law. For instance, the consensus view focuses more on norms, unification, and equality. At the same time, it questions individuals ‘self-control as causes of crime.
As Michalowski described it, most members of a society believe in the existence of core values (Schmalleger, 2012). The consensus view is about nothing but values, the different that are commonly known as right and wrong. The teaching of those values start at a very early stage of one’s life and we tend to adapt to them quite effectively. Most importantly, they become part of our lives to a point where we do not very much need a piece of paper to demonstrate it, we just grow to know that, for example, the killing of another person is wrong and respect for others is right. Those are the things that we know and believe and what makes it so effective is that, it isn’t just shared among a certain group of people. Every single member knows the difference between right and wrong regardless of their actions sometimes. It becomes part our nature so much that oftentimes, even if we do not get caught doing the wrong thing, our conscience just turns against us and we just cannot live with ourselves without making it right. It is automatically a part of us and it is not so very easy to break away from it, we cannot escape it. As a society, we know what is right and wrong and we live by it. Now, one might think just because within a specific group, there are various backgrounds and cultures, but as different as we may seem, when it comes to morality, there is not so much of a difference as we all want the same thing, to live peacefully and safely.
Moreover, the notions of right and wrong are not only shared, but also unify us as a society. For instance, majority of society’s members join hands toward together to work toward what they believe is “the greater good” (Schmalleger, 2012). Family, church, schools all teach the same thing. Within the family, one learns that hitting your sibling as well as taking back to your parents is wrong and going to school and...

Find Another Essay On The Consensus Perspective

Course Reflection (to teacher) - Psychology

395 words - 2 pages Transparency is built on the free flow of information. Processes, institutions and information are directly accessible to those concerned with them, and enough information is provided to understand and monitor them. Responsiveness Institutions and processes try to serve all stakeholders. Consensus orientation Good governance mediates differing interests to reach a broad consensus on what is in the best interests of the group and,. where

Society's Benefits to Certain Groups Essay

1473 words - 6 pages that norms and values are conformed to. In particular, value consensus is seen as essential since without it people would be pulling in different directions and the result would be conflict and disorder. Consensus from a consensus perspective, successful business people deserve high rewards. They have made important contributions to society by building up efficient and productive companies and providing employment

Margin of Appreciation in ECHR

3932 words - 16 pages a large extent is still true that the lesser the consensus, the wider the margin given. However, it is to be noted that, that may not be the case at all time. Having explained Harris’s statement, it is to be rigorously assessed if this doctrine is useful. It has been disparaged that it allows the oppressive government to continue from the Marxist Perspective. This doctrine could be said as an invention of the bourgeois that helps them

To what extent can the existence of social order be explained in term of the functionalist concept of value consensus?

1670 words - 7 pages ,society may expose to chaos and disorder.An example showing that society cannot function due to chaos is the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina,looting ,violence and other criminal activity become rampant in the state of confusion and lawlessness.Therefore,social order is essential for society to function in harmony,Value consensus is on agreement about values by members of society,refers to shared norms and values,which provide the foundation for

Cisco Case

1523 words - 6 pages forecasting provides an unbiased view of the future, shielded from traditional marketing enthusiasm. This baseline provides an invaluable perspective for understanding the true direction and magnitude of demand." Anne Robinson, Sr. Manager, Information and Data Strategy Once the consensus process is complete, the finalized forecasts are entered into Cisco's enterprise data warehouse for use across the company, and are also input into Cisco's demand

Societal Level Explanations of Crime

587 words - 2 pages The idea of a crime is highly relative or dependent. Scientific methods are used by criminologists to study the nature, extent, cause and control of criminal behavior. The concept of the study of crime emerged in the 19th century nevertheless the concepts of crimes have altered with times due to the emergence of modern laws. The two theories in question in this paper are structural consensus theories of crime and structural conflict theories of

Federalism

865 words - 3 pages , (Parkinson, 2007). The Meech Lake Accord was a document drafted in response to this as to bring Quebec back into the constitutional framework by outlining the five demands made by then Quebec Premier, Robert Bourassa. The document was contentious for both its substance and the procedure of them being negotiated on behind closed doors by the then, First Ministers.Though the argument can be well debated by supporters of the document that open consensus is

Monism, Dualism, and Pluralism in American History

1089 words - 5 pages It seems readily apparent that monism is without a doubt the very worst way to approach history, Societies and cultures are not one dimensional, but rather are made up of a tapestry of factors. Thus looking at just one aspect gives the historian only a myopic sense of what was going on or what people were thinking at a particular time or place in history. While this is typically thought of as being the consensus history of the great white men

Contemporary Language Situation in Wales

1673 words - 7 pages was vested in it's place. This relation between language and prestige saw Welsh garner erroneous negative connotations, becoming associated with social delinquency and the underclasses. The language began on a path of steady decline to a point where only an astonishing 500,000 identified as being 'Welsh speakers' whilst 250,000,000 stated they could not speak it proficiently (Wales Population Consensus 1971). This triggered a campaign

In this essay I will describe two sociological perspectives; I will also explain the similarities and differences between two of the main theories functionalism and Marxism

882 words - 4 pages society could be studied as a natural science and he took a micro perspective of society. Action theorists also criticise the functionalists consensus theory saying that it idealises institutions like the family and legitimises inequality. Functionalisms is also teleological, it does not produce testable hypothesis and is therefore unscientific. It fails to explain social change and it tends to justify the status quo.The structuralist theory is also

EVALUATE KUHN’S THEORY OF SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT

1799 words - 8 pages Introduction The scientific revolution started in the 16th and 17th century with development of the scientific theories (Hatch, n.d.). These Scientific theories are detailed explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly duplicated through observation and experimental procedures. The understanding or the attempt to understand the human’s perspective of the world through scientific theories is the

Similar Essays

Social Conflict Theories Essay

891 words - 4 pages Social Conflict Theories In the study of theories of criminology that emphasizes the role of social conflict as it underlies criminality and of social change is critical for the understanding of the interplay between social order and law. The conflict perspective, the pluralist perspective, and the consensus perspective are three analytical perspectives that shed light on this subject. Another type of social conflict theory is radical

Social Structure Essay

888 words - 4 pages range of possible differentiations.Conflict theory emphasizes those conflicts inherent to human society [Jary & Jary, 2000:105]. Its discourse is the emergence and causes of conflict within a particular human society. Some say that conflict theory deals with the incompatible aspects of human society.Emerging from the sociology of social order and social stability/social regulation, consensus theory is a sociological perspective in which

Social Conflict Theory Essay

887 words - 4 pages different perspectives in social conflict theory are the consensus perspective, the pluralist perspective, and the conflict perspective. There are also other theories that support the social conflict theory such as radical criminology, peacemaking criminology, and the left realist criminology, that all prove conflict will happen in order for change to happen. The consensus perspective is defined as a perspective that most members of society know

Three Perspectives On Social Organization Essay

765 words - 4 pages consensus, pluralist, and the conflict perspectives. The consensus perspective has a very naïve view of social organization. Within this view members of society generally share the same core values (Schmalleger, 2012). Laws, according to the consensus perspective, result from a “consensus” of the people and it serves each individual equally (Schmalleger, 2012). Those who violate the law are seen as being mentally unstable, or socialized