To spank or not to spank? The topic of corporal punishment is a controversial and sensitive matter in our society. No matter what day in age we live in it will continue to be a social problem. Corporal punishment, also referred to as spanking is deliberately inflicting pain on a person due to an inappropriate behavior or act they have done. This involves hitting, pinching, using switch cords, smacking, and etcetera. Those who are in favor of corporal punishment and believes that it should not be illegal, uses scriptures from the bible as justification. Supporters of corporal punishment feels as if spanking is an effective way to manage behavior. Those who are against spanking points out the ...view middle of the document...
Dr. Alvy’s argument is effective to some degree because he gives brief details and examples, and to be completely fair he provides details about the opposing side also. The mode of persuasion that is being used the most in this article is logos. By simplify reading this article you will realize logic and rationale being thrown left and right. Being one of the nation’s most respected and knowledgeable parenting figures one should not turn a blind eye to his words. Dr. Alvy makes exceptionally great points when he discuss the alternatives to spanking and when he states that “Those who are advocating for the proposed ban also remind us that there are parents of all cultural and religious groups who never use any type of corporal punishment and whose children grow up to be fine citizens.” Beating a child is unnecessary and is not an essential way to discipline them, no matter how harsh or light the hand is.
The list of harmful effects due to corporal punishment is endless. In the main article written by Alvy, “Spanking Should Be Illegal” he presents a list of damaging and negative outcomes associated with spanking from research. He addresses that
Many negative behaviors and outcomes have been regularly associated with the parental use of corporal punishment. These include greater depression, aggression and suicidal thoughts for children who are more frequent recipients of corporal punishment and of harsh corporal punishment, as well as poorer school performance and more anti-social behavior on the part of these frequently and harshly punished young people. Also, such youngsters have a higher likelihood of being victims of legally determined child abuse, probably because of the escalation effect mentioned above. These young people are also more likely to abuse their children and spouses when they grow up.
In much lucid and simpler terms, spanking a child does more harm than good. The benefits acquired from doing so is questionable.
The American Psychoanalytic Association (APSAA) is in agreement with Dr. Kerby T. Alvy’s position on shunning spanking. This committee believes that corporal punishment will not enhance a child’s capacity to develop healthy emotional lives. The organization stress how spanking traumatize a child in more ways than one. APSAA claims that
Spanking is a euphemism for hitting. One is not permitted to hit one's spouse or a stranger; such actions are defined as the crime of assault. Nor should one be permitted to hit a small and more vulnerable child. Hitting a child elicits precisely the feelings one does not want to generate in a child: distress, anger, fear, shame, and disgust. Studies show that children who are hit identify with the aggressor and are more likely to become hitters themselves, that is, bullies and future abusers of their own children and partners. They tend to learn to use violent behavior as a way to deal with stress and interpersonal disputes.
The American Psychoanalytic Association (APSAA) does not only...