This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Cosmological Argument Essay

1863 words - 7 pages

The Cosmological Argument

The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing
that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to
things that exist. It states that there must be a final
uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be
God.
The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically
represented below.

Cosmological Argument

1. Things exist.

2. It is possible for those things to not exist.

3. Whatever has the possibility of non existence, yet exists, has
been caused to exist.

A. Something cannot bring itself into existence since it must exist to
bring itself into existence which is illogical.

4. There cannot be an infinite number of causes to bring something
into existence.

. Because an infinite regression of causes ultimately has no initial
cause which means there is no cause of existence.

A. Since the universe exists, it must have a cause.

5. Therefore, there must be an uncaused cause of all things.

6. The uncaused cause must be God.

Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274) had a version of the Cosmological Argument
called the Argument from Motion. He stated that things in motion
could not have brought themselves into motion but must be caused to
move. There cannot be an infinite regression of movers. Therefore,
there must be an Unmoved Mover. This Unmoved Mover is God.

Strengths of the argument

The strengths of the Cosmological Argument lie in both its simplicity
and easily comprehensible concept that there cannot be an infinite
number of causes to an event. Some arguments for God's existence
require more thought and training in terms and concepts, but this
argument is basic and simple. Also, it is perfectly logical to assert
that objects do not bring themselves into existence and must,
therefore, have causes.

Weaknesses of the argument

One of the weaknesses of the argument is that if all things need a
cause to exist, then God Himself must also, by definition, need a
cause to exist. But this only pushes causation back and implies that
there must be an infinite number of causes which cannot be. This is
paradoxical.
Also, by definition, God is uncaused.

The Cosmological Argument

The basic notion of cosmological arguments is that the world and
everything in it is dependent on something other than itself for its
existence. In other word's, despite the fact that the world seems to
be self-perpetuating one needs to consider the source of all that
there is.

Although the cosmological argument was famously expressed in three of
Thomas Aquinas' Five Ways (rational arguments for the existence of
God), there is an early form of it in the writings of Plato (see
Plato's Cosmological Argument), and the argument is also largely
...

Find Another Essay On The Cosmological Argument

The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1245 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. Arguments like this are thought up to recognize why we and the universe exist. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically

The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument

862 words - 3 pages The Reasons Why Some Thinkers Rejected the Cosmological Argument Aquinas’s argument was as follows: If the universe was infinite, it would have an infinite number of days. The end of an infinite series of days can never be reached, so today would never arrive. However, today has arrived, so the past cannot be infinite. Time began when the universe began, which was an event. Events are caused; therefore there must have

The cosmological argument for the existence of God

1445 words - 6 pages A) The cosmological argument is to prove the existence of God. In this type of argument we are looking at cause and not design. This type of argument is an aposteriori argument because it is based upon experience. Thomas Aquinas puts the key ideas into 3 ways. First way is, motion/change. Nothing can move by itself or change itself. The first thing to have moved must have been moved by something else and that thing therefore must be God." It is

The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas

1455 words - 6 pages The Ontological Argument Presented by Descartes and the Cosmological Argument Presented by Aquinas Descartes, often called the father of modern philosophy, developed Anselm’s argument, in attempting to prove God’s existence from simply the meaning of the word ‘God’. The ontological argument is a priori argument, such arguments use logic to prove an initial definition to be correct. The basis of these arguments depends upon

Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1344 words - 5 pages Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The term cosmological comes from the Greek language, meaning ‘world’ or ‘universe.’ The argument is based on facts about the world. The topic of cosmology refers to the study of the universe. The cosmological argument begins with a general claim about the physical universe e.g. that some events have causes and that there must be a

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

940 words - 4 pages The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not logic so the outcome is probable or possible not definite. The argument is in three forms; motion, causation and being. These are also the first three ways in the

The Various Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

2389 words - 10 pages The Various Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument is a well established argument for the existence of God and it is also known as the first cause argument. The cosmological argument is based upon the belief that there is a first cause behind the existence of universe and this was God. It has taken many forms and in the past has been presented in many ways. So many

The Key Ideas of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

1709 words - 7 pages The Key Ideas of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God A) The cosmological argument is to prove the existence of god. In this type of argument we are looking at cause and not design. This type of argument is an aposteriori argument because it is based upon experience. Thomas Aquinas puts the key ideas into 3 ways. First way is, motion/change. Nothing can move by itself or change itself. The first thing to

Cosmological Argument is Invalid

1165 words - 5 pages Humans can never know for the certain why the universe was created or what caused it but, we can still create arguments and theories to best explain what might have created the universe. The cosmological argument is another idea to prove the existence of god. Many philosophers debate wheatear the cosmological argument is valid. The cosmological argument starts off quite simply: whatever exists must come from something else. Nothing is the source

St. Thomas Aquinas' Cosmological Argument

907 words - 4 pages Among the three arguments to prove God's existence, I find Aquinas's cosmological argument well-grounded in empirical evidence, and that the focus on simple facts proves acceptable in both historical and scientific dimensions. Aquinas starts by stating the preliminary matter that God's existence is not self-evident, and therefore we need to examine God's effects, which we are able to observe, to prove God's existence, although we are not able

Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument

1402 words - 6 pages Critique of Aquinas's Cosmological Argument Aquinas's 3rd way suggests that the world consists of contingent beings. As all contingent beings have a cause, namely another contingent being, there must have been a time when nothing existed, (unless contingent beings exist as a brute fact). Therefore, contingent beings could not have come into existence unless there is a necessary being which is non- contingent that caused

Similar Essays

The Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

1298 words - 5 pages could a timeless cause give rise to a temporal effect? Moreover, the cause must transcend both matter and time to create matter and time. Finally, in order to create the universe ex nihilo, this cause must be enormously powerful, if not omnipotent. One is warranted in concluding that therefore, God exists. With that, I now turn it over to kohai for his opening argument. Works Cited 1. David S. Oderberg, "Traversal of the Infinite, the “Big Bang” and the Kalam Cosmological Argument", Philosophia Christi 4 (2002): 305-36 2. Alexander Pruss, "From the Grim Reaper Paradox to the Kalaam Argument" http://alexanderpruss.blogspot.com...

The Main Properties Of The Cosmological Argument

1220 words - 5 pages The Main Properties of the Cosmological Argument The cosmological argument began with Plato and ever since been defended and attacked by many great philosophers. One of the supporters was Leibniz. The cosmological argument is basically an argument about causation. Its major supporter was Thomas Aquinas though Gotfried Leibniz also put forward a simplified version of Aquinas's cosmological argument. The major critics

The Main Strengths Of The Cosmological Argument

871 words - 3 pages The Main Strengths of the Cosmological Argument There are many strengths within the Cosmological Argument which have proven theories and ways to prove the existence of God. Many of these strengths have come from such scholars as; Copleston, Aquinas and Leibniz, all of which have put together major points to prove the existence of a non-contingent being. One of the main

The Cosmological Argument Is Self Contradictory Essay

1160 words - 5 pages The Cosmological Argument, also known as the First Cause Argument, is one of the most important arguments for the existence of God, not only because it is one of the more convincing, but also because it is one of the most used. The thought that everything that happens must have a cause and that the first cause of everything must have been God, is widespread. The cosmological argument is the argument from the existence