This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

The Cruelty Of Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

1391 words - 6 pages

The Cruelty of Animal Testing and the Need for Alternative Methods

In his book Inhumane Society: The American Way of Exploiting Animals, Dr. Michael W. Fox estimates that twenty-five to thirty-five million animals are used in the United States each year for laboratory testing and research (58). Research involving tests done on animals is unnecessary and cruel. More humane methods of research need to be employed.

Fox states that animal tests on cosmetics and household products are nothing more than a "public relations campaign to dispel public concern and give a false sense of security" (61). Laboratory animals are needlessly exploited and made to suffer cruelly in the name of research and testing. Fox also states that most companies that are continuing to test products on animals do so only because they do not want to have to begin putting warning labels on products that might alarm the consumers (61).

According to the book 67 Ways to Save the Animals by Anna Sequoia, there are many cosmetics companies, such as Revlon and Avon, that have stopped testing their products on animals. However, there are still companies, such as Gillette, that continue to test their products on animals (26).

Many animal tests were formulated back in the 1920s and 1930s. These tests are still being used today. According to the journal by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), published in March of 1995, many tests are still being used even though they are not terribly effective (9).

Anna Sequoia states that one test that is currently being used is called the Draize Acute Eye Irritancy Test. This test is done primarily on albino rabbits, because the albino rabbit is docile and cheap, and because its eyes do not produce tears that could wash foreign chemicals out of the eye (27).

Sequoia states that during the Draize test, several rabbits are immobilized and a foreign substance is placed in their eyes. This substance could be anything from mascara to oven cleaner. The rabbit's eyes are kept clamped open during this painful process and usually no anesthesia is administered to the animal. Rabbits are then examined periodically for a period of days or weeks. Reactions, which range from inflammation and clouding of the cornea to rupturing of the eyeball, are recorded. The rabbits that survive the Draize test are then used for skin irritancy tests (27).

Sequoia states several important reasons why the Draize test should not be used anymore. Rabbit eyes and human eyes are not the same. Therefore, substances that are damaging to a rabbit's eye may not be toxic to a human's. Similarly, substances that are very irritating to human eyes may have no effect on a rabbit's eyes. This test is also difficult to reproduce, and results vary from laboratory to laboratory (28).

Sequoia gives several alternatives to the Draize test. One is called the EYETEX System, which is used to determine the eye irritancy of specimens ranging from toothpaste...

Find Another Essay On The Cruelty of Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

A More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1628 words - 7 pages It’s Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation The debate about using animals for medical testing has been raging for years. The struggle always seems to be between extremist animal rights activists who believe that animals should never be used for research, and scientists who believe that any use of animals is acceptable. There are a growing number who argue that there must be a reasonable

Animal Cruelty - testing Essay

990 words - 4 pages research (Wolff, 2009). Human and animals are very similar, for scientific is easy to use animals to find cures for humans decease. It difficult to scarified innocent animals but those animals help human to continue living. While there are multiple accusations of animal cruelty, few people actually witness the inner workings of a research lab and multiple regulations prevent animal cruelty, but animal research still continues to cause pain (Wolff

Animal Testing is Animal Cruelty

1814 words - 7 pages Animal Testing is Animal Cruelty The way I look at animal testing is a form hateful cruelty. None of these people care about if it hurts or kills the animals. The cruelty has been going on long enough and I think it is time to stop. What people do not know is that animal’s react a different way to drugs as humans do, so scientist cannot apply the results to humans. Many animals go through screaming, unbearable, horrific; you cannot even imagine

It's Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1442 words - 6 pages The debate about using animals for medical testing has been ongoing for years. The struggle is usually between extreme animal rights activists and scientists. The animal rights activists believe animals should never be used for research, and the scientists believe any use of animals is acceptable. Listed below are factual historical accounts of animal use, statistics, and arguments against the use of animals. In ancient Greece animals were

Animal Testing: Cruelty versus Benefit

1007 words - 4 pages bullets. This list violence and cruelty can go on and on, but isn’t it enough to convince us that animal experimenting must be put to an end once and for all? The science correspondent of “The Guardian” Randerson (2008) has found out that about 115 million animals were used in scientific research globally in 2005, according an estimate based on official national figures from the number of scientific papers that were published involving animals

Animal Experimentation and Research

2622 words - 10 pages advancements made, the use of animals remains an unethical practice. I feel that animal experimentation has the capacity to be very beneficial to medical research. However, scientists should try to prevent as much suffering as possible. Likewise, it would be a good idea to prohibit unnecessary testing and experimentation, especially with the recent development of many alternatives. Despite mounting controversy, many people still find

The Horrors of Animal Experimentation

1188 words - 5 pages there are better alternatives? In general, non-animal tests are faster and less expensive than the animal tests they replace. Animal experimentation does not just have better alternatives, but also, the amount of money spent on animal tests is outrageous. According to the U.S National Institutes of Health (NIH), animal testing costs billions of dollars and takes up 40% of all research funding from the NIH (‘Vivisection:Outdated, Cruel, and

The Cons of Animal Experimentation

943 words - 4 pages to protect themselves thereby” (Ruesch 66). Credible doctors and scientists have proven time and time again that animal testing does not achieve anything for human medications and can be very risky when it comes to product testing. Companies test their products through animal experimentation for the sole purpose of not having to deal with being sued for no tests being issued on their products. Many companies are not even worried about the test

The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

1315 words - 5 pages The Necessities of Animal Experimentation Throughout my paper, I felt as though I was able to give a solid and fair representation of the opposing viewpoint on issue of animal testing. However, it was challenging because I strongly oppose animal testing. The rhetorical analysis played a role in this, because I was required to use the various rhetorical appeals to compose a strong argument. Using the appeals definitely helped in trying

The Effects of Animal Experimentation

1879 words - 8 pages Tens of millions of animals are killed or maimed each year through research on the safety and effectiveness of new drugs, chemicals, and consumer products. Even though animals are not humans does not mean they should be used for testing, which is so inhumane. These animals could have a different importance in society than just experimentation. What is done to animals is usually not safe, ending up with the animal injured or even dead. This

The Benefits of Animal Experimentation

1165 words - 5 pages teachings support animal testing, as long as it benefits humans there is no unnecessary pain being inflicted. Experimentation of living animals has been used since before 500 B.C. (“Should Animals be”). To discover the workings of living things, scientists such as, Aristotle, Herophilus, and Erasistratus experimented with living animals (5). Aristotle believed that animals could not feel pain and lacked intelligence, so it was perfectly acceptable

Similar Essays

The Cruelty Of Animal Testing Essay

1694 words - 7 pages along the Ground.", 2004. Web. 10 Jan. 2014. Knight, Andrew. "Animals in Research: Do the Costs Outweigh The benefits?" The Conversation. N.p., 6 Aug. 2013. Web. 10 Jan. 2014. "Proverbs 12:10 The Righteous Care for the Needs of Their Animals, but the Kindest Acts of the Wicked Are Cruel." Proverbs 12:10 The Righteous Care for the Needs of Their Animals, but the Kindest Acts of the Wicked Are Cruel., 2004. Web. 10 Jan. 2014. Ringach, Dario L., Dr, Jane Goodall, Charles Darwin, and Mark Twain. "Animal Testing -" ProConorg Headlines. N.p., 18 Dec. 2013. Web. 08 Jan. 2014.

Needless Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation Is Wrong

964 words - 4 pages Needless Animal Experimentation is Wrong   If penicillin had been tested on guinea pigs, it might never have reached the public. It is lethal to guinea pigs, deactivates the blood system of rabbits and is deadly to cats ("Bio-Medical Research"). Scientists are pushing for more experiments regardless of the cost to the animal's life. "One expense is the involvement of killing animals in the pursuit of a pine-scented air freshener"(Vergoth

We Need More Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

1477 words - 6 pages We Need More Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation   A life can be taken or created in a matter of seconds and with that has come the miracles of modern medicine. People have come to expect science to save lives, prevent illness, relieve suffering and improve the quality of life. The means of curing, treating and preventing diseases are not achieved by magic or accident. Medical advances are gained through years of intensive

Let's Put An End To Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

2006 words - 8 pages We Must Put an End to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation Without animal research, cures for such diseases as typhoid, diphtheria, and polio might never have existed. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed. Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead. However, because of animal testing, 200,000 dogs, 50,000 cats, 60,000 primates, 1.5 million hamsters, and